I fixed it for you.

:thumbsup

may be the case but porn is for looking at and thats not something that you can photograph

Bleh, it's not as simple as that. By your logic, all porn meant for males should have no males in it.

The point of having dicks etc. is so the viewers can associate themselves with the person on screen. There's a psychological term for this, but I'm not putting any more effort into this thread than you did.

Well one thing is for sure. Bukkake and cumshots sell good :)

Nor would you want to, but sex is in the brain, and the erotic is created to stimulate the brain, so show the actors expressions, the way their body reacts, reproduce the feeling, thats the point, thats the job,

Hence a great performance with "chemistry" is a million times better than the bored grunting of a someone going through the motions.

she Nailed it right there :thumbsup

There's lots of things done "wrong" in most of porn. Or maybe we're just not the average customers.

So what you are saying its the girl's fault for acting like she enjoys it?

hey is it rookie day? nobody told me! ;)

Facials and coming anywhere externally is popular because it is more visual. There's no way to show a guy coming inside other than bad acting or disgustingly up close internal shots that nobody wants, so it works better visually to show it this way. Has less to do with degradation than you would expect. This is a form of entertainment lest we forget so flaring it up as much as possible and pushing the norms is the nature of the business.

Although cream pie sites sell decently too, but that is a much smaller market in comparison.

No, its keep on doing the same old thing day, which is all over the internet FOR FREE !!!!


What ever you don't think.

The interesting , original and HOt might actually keep selling...

The main thing I can't understand about facials is the guy jerking off rather than the girl jerking him off. Which one is more attractive?

100% agreed:thumbsup

So what you show is a guy jerking himself off, with this girl trying to look excited in the background about to get splattered. That's the best you can do ?

I suppose it puts the audience and the performer in the same category - both wankers !

When they both grow up maybe they'll have real sex.

You're either a closet fag, or talking too much sense... :1orglaugh

exactly. imagine every scene where the guy cums inside the girl (mouth, pussy or ass) and exclaims "yah bitch i just came, how do you like that!" to which the girl replies "oh yes baby it was great, i can feel that cum inside me and i just came too!" :helpme

this is why it is appropriately named the money shot;)

cherry is also an 'anarchist' or communist or some shit. she/he ain't too bright.

No need to worry then, go back to sleep.

You are trying to reinvent the wheel here... Just because you are suggesting everyone do something different doesn't mean it will work.. in fact, I can pretty much guarantee it wont work.

I understand what you are saying, there is a market that doesn't want the 'in your face' degrading content and the more sensual stuff but that is a different market altogether than what most of us are selling here. Even the women want the nasty shit...

In short, love making sites? small market base nasty fuck sites? make bank...

why do i get the feeling that's the closest thing to a compliment I'll be getting from you?? :1orglaugh

how long is the flight from California?? :winkwink:
this thread is awesome :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I suggesting do something different, nasty or nice, but a few new ideas might make it less boring... I am surprised at how conservative it all is...

The other point is we make the audience, change what you do create new audience.

that's just it, we don't make the audience, the audience is there already... We give them what they want.

we get more requests than most i'm sure, i've seen the emails, i talk with customer service often.. nobody around asking for cgi effects, sex in space or porn musicals... they want more of the same just different girls mostly...


That being said we are releasing a pretty unique site out today that has a niche i've yet to see before so check that out later when we announce it :)

I respectfully but strongly disagree :-)
Every once in a while, there's a really new concept that does a ton of bucks for a little while until everybody copies it - and after that it just becomes a new niche. (Who did XGF stuff ten years ago?)

So yes, there is space for creating new things.

If you can say you don't like something you should have a good idea as to what you do like.
Just saying " do something different " is no help and pretty much just talking in circles.

So pretend you are a producer with unlimited resources and write us a scene the way you think it should be done.

I'm going to stand apart from the crowd here... and blame Canada.

I do just that on our website... have not shot a cumshot yet, ......

This thread is stupid.... Facials FTW!

some people just spend too much time worrying about shit that don't matter anyway. :2 cents:

From LA to Moscow is about 9 hours or so.

allow me to comment, and to a large extent i agree fully with Cherry7.

i think there are a lot of consumers of online porn who have little or no interaction with females, socially or sexually. to this extent there is a brewing bitterness where the consumer like to see the girl (since he cant have her) being degraded to some extent.
there are always exceptions:

the girl loves to be spit on, choked, slapped and cum on etc. there are actully a large ratio or porngirls who like this type treatment (sasha grey is a good example).

facial/swallow type pop done right:
a good facial pop is actually a product of finishing the guy orally but it has wrongfully evolved, we need it to go back to the girl blowing the guy until he cums type of pop, not the guy wanking in his face (this practice is gay and i never allow it on my set).

creampies is the natural way, in the 70's/80's porn the guy would pull out and shoot on the girls tummy, this was nice also.

@Dave
when i ask the girl how they prefer it, often times they say creampie.
you have to know how to ask... usually i tell them if creampie their make up will still look great.

You posted this just so people would look and see your sig! :1orglaugh

I'm Dutch - We stick our fingers in dykes ;)))

I would have to respectfully disagree right back because the exgf niche is just another word for amateur content, which was huge back in the old days, they just renamed it and had the girl take more self taken shots.... nothing new...

It doesn't mean that we don't try to release new and whacky stuff to see if it works, we do more than most... diaperlovingmommies.com and spinonmycock.com are some recent releases of ours and if you think those aren't some what original then I'd hate to think what you think is... ;)

I may not be the average porn consumer. My idea of hot is seeing 2 naked girls kiss. Thats it.

Buhkake is not my thing but I can understand it. Girl gives amazing blowjob and you want to show it off to the camera or to yourself. Thats fine. But what is up with spitting in a girls face after you have sex with her? Unless its something that she actually wants, I'll never understand it.

I'm Canadian! We're polite to them!

The keyphrase here is "she actually wants".

This thing is not my thing either, but there's not much to "understand" or judge, on what happens between fully consenting adults.

Following the "will never understand" path, you risk to consider immoral anything other than the missionary position.