GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Wisconsin coverage vs Tea Party coverage.... REALLY???

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Wisconsin coverage vs Tea Party coverage.... REALLY??? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1011501)

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17940603)

The largest corporations are all multi-nationals now.

They play an international shell game, and they don't pay nearly the taxes they owe... if any at all!

Besides, you're a brainwashed ass. Just face it. Look into the mirror, and be honest with yourself.

Just be honest with yourself, and repeat after me... "I am 12 Dicks, and I am an ass. I think I am rich, but I am a peon. I am nobody."

and repeat...

the taxes they owe.
what a joke.........
don';t worry, we'll still pay for the lifestyle you couldn't afford on your own. :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17940633)

the taxes they owe.
what a joke.........
don';t worry, we'll still pay for the lifestyle you couldn't afford on your own. :1orglaugh

You are a fool!

I fling fecal matter into your general direction!

http://politicalmonkey2010.files.wor...opthrowing.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17940597)

when leftists wanted to pretend corporations were something to be taxed, did you really think they wouldn't be allowed to be heard?:1orglaugh

Corporations are a privilege, allowed under corporate law - period! They are not a right - they can be taken away from you. Under Corporate statutes, they are allowed to own property, sign contracts, and.. and... PAY TAXES!

They are the ones that should be paying the peoples cut of the taxes, because that is what they were created for. It's actually illegal to tax the people, it's just forced on us.

Straight up, your reply is pathetic, I mean come on, is this what is really going on in your twisted mind, are you really this uneducated about this stuff or are you just trolling to troll?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17940651)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 17940674)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

It's not funny to laugh at your lack of education.

Before this Country was even founded, Corporations had already moved in and taxes being collected. Shortly after the Country was formed, Corporations and the Fed (internally) dealing with distilled spirits, carriages, refined sugar, tobacco and snuff, property sold at auction, corporate bonds, and slaves - where taxed internally, within the structure of those goods.

Then it moved back to taxing only imports/export of good, ie teriffs. Then during peace time, they tried to add an income tax to people, which was shot down.

Then in 1909, Congress setup the first 'Corporate' income tax, which was legal in way of an excise tax and a constitutional amendment to allow the previously enacted income tax (yep, had it before too). Corps were already getting taxed, this moved it to an income tax.

And bam, we have the base structure of the tax system we use today - which is, without question, legally taxed.

So you were saying? Oh, yeah "hen leftists wanted to pretend corporations were something to be taxed" - Hahahaha, well buddy, this is all common shit you learn in about 3rd grade, you can look in history books, wiki, or research it allllllll over the Internet and even libraries.

Enjoy....

Watched beck, o'riely yesterday, yeah pretty conservative leaning for sure, though didn't think it was too bad. Though watch Rachel Maddow's show on msnbc and it was just one giant anti republican attack session. Was pretty bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage (Post 17941580)

Sausage...

http://www.legaljuice.com/Sausage%20...sage%20man.jpg

Quote:

At the start of the call, Walker eagerly reports on all he is doing: First, he tells the fake Koch brother about a plan to change Senate rules on pay to reel-in the out-of state Democratic senators who are holding out to protect collective bargaining. The new rule would force the Senators to pick up their paychecks in person. This rule was passed in a partisan vote in the Senate yesterday -- a move that went unnoticed by the mainstream press. The fake Koch asks Walker how they might get others in Senate to vote to stop collective bargaining. Walker responds that he's involved the Justice Department in investigating whether the union is paying the absent Democratic senators to remain out of state, or providing them with food, shelter, etc., saying it would be an ethics violation or potentially a felony. Wisconsin legislators are well aware of these rules and have already stated they are using their own money while they are out of state.

But the Governor also explains how he is going to lay off thousands of Wisconsin workers as a tactic to get the Democrats to cooperate: "So, we're trying about four or five different angles. Each day we crank up a little bit more pressure. The other thing is I've got layoff notices ready, we put out the at-risk notices, we'll announce Thursday, they'll go out early next week and we'll probably get five to six thousand state workers will get at-risk notices for layoffs. We might  ratchet that up a little bit too."

The move has been called "despicable" and "ruthless " and "sickening." But most importantly, if Walker is choosing to lay off workers as a political tactic when he wasn't otherwise planning to do so, then it is not just morally repugnant, but legally questionable. State and federal contract and labor law has protections against this type of abusive behavior and inappropriate quid pro quo.

This morning the Capital Times quotes the state's former Attorney General: "There clearly are potential ethics violations, and there are potential election-law violations and there are a lot of what look to me like labor-law violations," said Peg Lautenschlager, a Democrat who served as Wisconsin's Attorney General after serving for many years as a U.S. Attorney. The head of the state teacher's association, Mary Bell, reminds us: "He literally planned to use five to six thousand hardworking Wisconsin taxpayers as political pawns in his political game. He actually thought through a strategy to lay people off -- deny them the ability to feed their families -- and use it as leverage for his political goals."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/why-a...#ixzz1F2K9kLwF

...and also :thumbsup to try to get nevada workers (prostitutes) out of work by trying to get prostitution declared illegal in all Nevada ...

I Think very teacher should make $300,000 a year.
Get to have sex with the Cheerleaders.
And Have a BMW.