The cheeks, general face shape and eye shape does not match.

she doesn't even look 15

Agree 100% with Rob, the teenage whore is clearly to be blamed here because she provided faked documents to RK so they would hire her. RK has enough girls lining up outside their doors to do porn that they do not need to sign underage girls.

And now the mother wants to cry foul and get get money from this??? Give me a break, like mother like daughter, both are whores in every sense of the word here. The real victims here are RK. :mad:

On a side note, damn that is one ugly whore. What was RK thinking putting that lockness monster on video. I have seen cuter black girls than that "thing"

I wonder if she'll do porn again when she's legal? :)

For an interesting read on statutory rape, look up Garnett v. State, 632 A.2d 797 (Md. 1993).

To summarize, Raymond Garnett was a retarded 20 year old man with the mental faculties of a 11-12 year old. 13 year old Erica Frazier told him to climb a ladder and enter her bedroom through a window, yada-yada, she gave birth nine months later. Garnett was tried for 2nd degree rape of a person under 14 by another 4 years older. Although defense tried to introduce testimony that the girl and her friends had told Garnett that she was 16 the court had it stricken as immaterial. Garnett was found guilty.

Is it me only but on the right pic is an afro american type while left is white, no?

no............

I thought the law was, if they have boobs or you think they are legal then its ok.

You are a fucking retard! What do you think this thread is about?

As for it being the same person, RKNet Media isnt even challenging that its the same girl. Therefore, its safe to assume that she is one and the same...

As for the other issues raised by RK, they are using the fact that she presented two valid forms of ID as the basis for their defense.

Interestingly enough the plaintiff's attorney didnt allege any rights to publicity claims in the Complaint which might have saved it. They really only allege the statutory rape and child porn as the basis for their lawsuit. A minor cannot sign a model release or any other contract without parental approval or the contract can be voided by the minor.

RK might win their motion to dismiss. However it will probably be without prejudice and plaintiff's attorney will have a chance to correct their mistakes and refile (However I do not know Florida Civil Procedure). If they do win the motion with prejudice its game over for the girl and her mom.

RK filed their motion March 7th so it shouldnt be too much longer until the court reaches a decision....

If you would have seen the naked submission pics you would have changed your mind trust me.