Tempest |
05-25-2011 11:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L
(Post 18167378)
My only qualm with "Thrones" is at times I do feel like I better read the books to figure out what is going on because the dialog involves discussions of things that are presented as almost random asides about deep histories of things that haven't been established in any way, (kind of like that crazy voice over narration recounting 25% of the plot in the space of a minute or so in the movie version of "Dune")the back stories are rich and hard to keep up with as a result, like names of people or events that obviously will have great bearing on future actions, so I find myself asking someone that has read the books tons of questions. I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing because it does seem to unfold more and more of those plot details through on screen action.
|
The first book, if I remember correctly, doesn't go into deep background info either.. All that sort of stuff dribbles out over time.. Keeps you wanting to read more...
I think one of the problems some people have with the show is all the sub plot intrigues that are going on.. All of it comes out slowly over time.
The scene where Starks son gets thrown out the tower window by the queens brother cause he saw them fucking may have seemed a bit overblown, the sex part just for "shock"... But given this last episode, a bunch of things should have fallen into place for people... i.e. why the murdered Hand was tracking down all the Kings bastards, reading thru the book of ancestry, and of course why he was murdered.
|