digitalfantasies |
07-17-2011 07:26 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 488
(Post 18288545)
examples?
|
Same way a free tube site doesn't necessarily replace ALL paysites. It does affect a huge part of the market obviously but paysites with exclusive content still make sales (think fetish, certain micro niches, think exclusive, think creative etc)
I believe in a way the same holds true for cam sites. A naked girl on MFC that you and countless other people can watch for free while she is performing is obviously not as exclusive as a girl that you will have to pay for example $5,99- per minute in a one2one session just to watch her perform the same stuff. And if a customer is looking for "exclusive girls", he's more likely interested in the "hard to get" $5,99 girl.... in stead of the "free" MFC girl... Free in a way means NOT exclusive ;-)
That doesn't mean the one system is better than the other system, or some girls are better than other girls, but it does mean different systems serve different customers, and for a reason.
i can imagine MFC-type sites might have some effect on the webcam market, off course there are plenty of guys really happy seeing naked girls for free they usually had to pay for...But for other people that is just not what "webcam sex" is all about...
Remember: the top girls make the most money talking (not with fucking their pussy with extremely huge toys)
I have nothing to do with the MFC system, I don't have models, I only promote "old-school pay-per-minute" sites with targeted SEO traffic, and my sales are still going up...
|