Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
(Post 18349670)
from the debates last night:
Ron Paul on Iranian sanctions: "That makes it much worse. Why would that be so strange if the Soviets and the Chinese had nuclear weapons, we tolerated the Soviets. We didn't attack them. And they were a much greater danger. They were the greatest danger to us in our whole history. But you don't go to war with them."
Paul also asked the audience to consider the nuclear issue from the perspective of the Iranian people:
"Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there. The Indians are there. The Pakistanis are there. The Israelis are there. The United States is there. All these countries ... why wouldn't it be natural if they might want a weapon?"
|
I agree.
Just because we have been told what the Iranians will do with a nuke should they have one, doesn't mean that is what they are going to do. We've been told so many lies from our government over the decades that there is no telling what is factual anymore, as well as who is a real threat and who is not. Or, who is a threat today because they didn't play ball, but in reality just a few years ago were no threat at all.
Everyone, regardless of how crazy we are led to believe they are, should be entitled to the same security and military options as the USA and other nations have. It's as simple as that.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't keep an eye on them and be ready to wipe them off the face of the earth should they so much as open their missile silo doors, but if they want nukes, they should be allowed to have them. And really, who are we or anyone else to say otherwise? The United States as murdered more innocent civilians in their "war against terror" and other bullshit wars than Iran ever has. Yet, Ahmadinejad is the mad man. And while he may be, who has more blood on their hands?
|