Letting them all just collapse would have collapsed wallstreet completely, meaning everyone would have lost way more money than they did in the end. It would have been much more expensive. At least thats my opinion.

Bunch of failed consumers ...

http://troll.me/images/dunkinobama/k...ers-donuts.jpg

http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/...on-poverty.jpg

http://www.dakotavoice.com/wp-conten..._Shankbone.jpg

http://static6.businessinsider.com/i...all-street.jpg

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/in...1_58590925.jpg

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls...m16uo1_500.jpg

http://www.mamamia.com.au/wp-content...l-street-2.jpg

http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-c...WallStreet.jpg

ADG

There are families out there who are clearing $10 billion + per year. One of my friends dated the daughter of one of these guys and she admitted it to him. She told him their family cleared that much every year and this was in 1998. Imagine what they are making with all these wars, stock market turmoil, and currency fluctuations. Bill Gates was never even close to being the richest person on earth. The wealthiest people do not want you to know how much they are worth so they hide it in various ways. One way is to spread it around to different family members and foundations. Another way is to simply have their lapdogs in the media not even speak of the issue.

These are the people who groom presidents and other leaders from a young age. These are the people who control what news items make it to the mainstream outlets (as well as many alternative outlets) and of course they control the slant of those carefully selected stories. These ideas are pounded into your pea sized brain over and over and over until you believe it and therefore becomes "reality". These people have mass psychology mastered at this point in the game and I sit in awe of what they have accomplished. Obama is just another one of their boys. Don't want Obama next 4 years? No problem! Just pick one of our other boys! (Romney, Perry, Gingrich, Huntsman, etc)

http://www.general-election-2010.co....tains-gold.jpg
Let's take a look at the case of one of their boy Gordon Brown. Back in 1999 he was the Chancelor of Britain he dumped 400 tons of the countries gold when the price was around $250. Now who the fuck do you think bought that gold?:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Of course Gordon Brown was rewarded and became the Prime Minister. Turds will vote for whoever they are told to vote for. Ask yourself how the hell Obama came out of nowhere and became the crowd favorite so fast. Humans are incredibly stupid and they are getting exactly what they fucking deserve. Look at these complete retards on GFY still debating Republican vs Democrat politics when it is painfully obvious that both parties are completely controlled by the same interests.:repuke

I am telling you that this Occupy Wall Street protest is orchestrated by the same crowd. I don't know for sure what will happen but whatever does happen will just serve to give them even more power and wealth. If Occupy Wall Street was in fact real at first then it certainly has been hijacked. Fat cat Marxists like Michael Moore do not get up off their bloated asses and spew bullshit in front of a crowd of smelly communist/anarchist/ruckus rousers for no good reason. He was ordered to do it.

So true... they're profiting off the monetary business of our entire country at levels we wont fully understand for decades, greed.... greed is the true enemy.

Obama is a corporatist. I think anyone that will bend backwards for the American big corps, has a real shot at gaining enough money to become President, meaning I don't believe a person or him, has to be groomed through life to trick us all in some grand scheme. The influence they have is powerful enough to remain in control no matter who might become President, keeping that control doesn't seem to be an issue either.

This protest is being overtaken by the fake liberal jackasses that skew the message. It should be easy to spot the fakes after this, if they redirect the message, it will be easy to out them. If they help focus it correctly and use the power/influence to actually help, well then... shit, I guess we do have some good guys in the mix of everyone being bad.

I love that so many people see the problem(s) though, even if none of us fully understand what's going on, people are without question aware something very f'ed up is going on. And that's all that matters.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=GO_WC0FINmA

What are you afraid of?

There's nothing wrong with making a ton of money, but there's something really corrupt about making such insanely ludicrous sums of cash for what is essentially speculating, and moving some numbers around -- and who knows what the hell else those people do. I think its a great movement, and I'm no hippie lover.

:thumbsup

I really don't understand this whole debate over whether or not OWS is grass roots or not. You can't have this type of thing go on without organization. The same thing occurred with the Tea Party. If you think that the Tea Party is a grass roots movement but OWS isn't then you are an idiot. They both had monied support and cooperative organization between many different groups.

Here is the central question... why is it that when one group protests something they don't agree with that they are hailed as legitimate but when another group does the same thing they are a mob and "ruckus rousers"?

We are all Americans... and whether or not you agree with one group or not... you should agree that all of the above mentioned groups have a RIGHT to express their frustration.

You show me a Marxist and I will show you an Ayn Rand fan... Show me a Christian and I will show you an Atheist. We are a large and diverse country and, whether or not you agree with someone else's view, each group has it's own legitimate claim.

From my perspective, I am tired of the dismissive nature of our national conversation. It exists purely for the purpose of division.

The Tea Party and conservative movement certainly has fringe elements... that doesn't mean that everything that the Tea Party or conservative movements represent is fringe.

OWS, labor, and all of these other liberal groups certainly have some fringe elements. That doesn't mean that everything they represent is fringe.

OWS largely represents the frustration of people who think that the government is controlled by monied interests and Wall Street represents a large part of that monied interest.

Their is actually, at it's base, a shared reason for existence for both the Tea Party movement (at it's beginning) and OWS. The only substantive difference is the proposed solution to that same problem.

In my view, the Tea Party is misguided because they think that the problem originates from the government. I say this is misguided because there is an entire industry dedicated to growing government and those are the very people who support their cause... and that industry isn't a political party. It is almost wholly supported by business interests. They write the great majority of legislation... they pump in the major money... they ARE the government.

Think about the groups behind each of these "grass roots" movements. Both sides have billionaire backers... however, the Tea Party is largely backed by corporate interests and lobbyists. The Tea Party Express, Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks and a multitude of other organizations like them are all staffed by lobbyists and were founded with corporate money. Also, there is really nothing new about that movement other than the amount of money being invested in it. The message is the same and the purpose is the same all the way back to the early 1980s.

Liberal movements, for the most part, are rarely backed by corporations or lobbyists as primary players. They are typically backed, in large part, by labor unions or political groups. I don't see MSNBC organizing protest events... Fox News did. This is a simple example of the point.

The people that say there is no difference between the parties are partially correct. The constant common denominator is that Wall Street has an inordinate amount of influence over the government no matter who has been in control for the last 20+ years... ever since Don Regan was appointed as Treasury Secretary in 1981, Goldman Sachs has had large influence over the monetary policy of every administration. The list of Goldman Sachs executives who have been appointed to high level treasury and Fed positions is as long as your arm. The Obama administration is no different.

That is the basis of OWS.

Yes the Tea Party is another example of of a cause/group that was hijacked.

Seems they've hit a nerve, haven't they? :1orglaugh

So, tax money and socialism for the superrich in order to save 'everyone'. A little risk transfer. Dig in your pockets folks, we have to save "everyone", too big to fail, ya know.

Abandon the risk model of capitalism, take the money from 'everyone' to save the economy by saving the rich who created and owned the risky paper, and save 'everyone'.

So now 'everyone' is stuck with the rich folk's risky bills, but 'everyone' was saved.

Especially the bankers who took the risks on 'everyone's' behalf. They took the money, we took the risk. Now they keep taking the money - and we get endless recession.

I see what you did there.

Hence, #occupy.

Seems so. The pussy factor of the foxfags and the tea ladies hits a nerve.

Cuz, like I said, the possibility of revolution was teh one thing the teadrinkers had going for them - before they got sold.

Great post! :thumbsup

You have the balls to lecture Americans on their ability to think when you just blamed the tea party for a second recession? Wow, amazing. Your entire contribution to this thread consists of bitching about the republicans/tea party/fox news while calling others sheep when the only sheep here is you with your predictable Internet forum rant devoid of any logic or facts. Please just stop embarrassing yourself.

Where did he say that?

You held the country hostage, and by that lowered our credit rating, which was a contributing factor in the interlocking processes which triggered this current period which looks very much like the beginning of a 2nd recession.

I'm not the one who came up with the idea that this is the tea party recession - it's quite common. This 2nd recession is teh tea party recession.

I think of it as the tea ladies recession, because you tea people have been sold, your new owners took your balls, you are all pretty subservient now.

If you cant take the blame, maybe you shouldn't have held the country hostage with that phoney deficit crisis nonsense your fox masters told you to parrot.

Which, if true (more on that), becomes completely irrelevant when you ignore the monetary and fiscal mismanagement of Obama and the left, seeing as how they're the ones that put us in an even bigger hole. You're incredibly biased and therefore are unable to argue using facts. You blame one party for one mistake but refuse to blame the other party for the same, yet bigger mistake. You take no responsibility as a US citizen for your part in the crisis that's been going on since the 70s. I'm not sure when we got out of the first recession to begin a second one but you clearly haven't been paying attention since 2008. You're blaming the tea party for holding the country hostage and lowering the credit rating when it was the direct result of Obama's continued stimulus policies and helicopter Bernanke's free flow printing production. And finally, you allude to me being party of the tea party which tops off your ridiculous posts. I'm neither tea party nor republican but it gets sad when a grown man who pretends to be intelligent, calls everyone else dumb and then posts some of the dumbest stuff this forum has ever seen. BFT3K would be proud.

So your argument is "it's true because everyone says it is"? That's really sad. And the only ones who are coming up with it are the idiotic left who try to deflate from their own runaway spending and retarded economic policies.

As opposed to you representing the typical internet forum user? Every conspiracy is true and everyone is a sheep towards idea 1, 2, or 3 while you yourself are a free thinker? Ever consider denial being party of your insecurity?

Maybe you shouldn't have been living under a rock the whole time and saw what was happening, like the rest of the "subservient" crowd, as opposed to making up your own reality and hoping it was true. Good job, sheep.

Interesting... it is a well known fact that GFY conservative - The Demon - only accepts his own "facts" and those "facts" are not necessarily real facts.

A "pot.kettle.black" statement wouldn't do you justice since you're known for the exact same thing, but without introducing any facts. :winkwink:

Well said! It should be pointed out that OWS was largely brought together by Adbusters Magazine which has been doing popular culture jamming for years.
Being a proponent of democratic capitalism I don't agree with everything they do, but they can be pretty amusing-
http://mtpundit.com/wp-content/uploa...ling-stone.jpg
http://ccit300-f06.wikispaces.com/fi.../adbusters.jpg
http://ccit300-f06.wikispaces.com/fi.../adbusters.gif

Krugmans post on #occupy was pretty good...

Confronting the Malefactors

If thats behind a paywall go to google news and type is Confronting The Malefactors.

"Class warfare", oh yeah, I bet that will go over gangbusters in the election season. You guys should TOTALLY go with it. Sell it.