I don't think they are trying to "villify" it. ESPECIALLY MSNBC which is crazy left biased.

I think they are showing the burning cars in ROME because they want ratings.
And the times I've seen the burning cars footage the reporter sounds pretty sympathetic to the protestors.

You know they always spin that stuff.
Just like when the Libyan Army tried to go into a town held by rebels. We bombed the fuck out of them and our govt. controlled media "reported" that it was to stop Ghadafi from slaughtering his citizens.
Now they show footage of the town Serta (I think that was the town) and it shows the NEW Libyan govt. forces (the former "rebels") rolling through town with military vehicles and the whole town is in ruins. And they "report" that the new govt. forces are trying to "take control" of the city full of "pro-Ghadafi" "forces".

In other words...it's okay for "our side" to slaughter civilians. lol

The media is 100% run by the U.S. Govt.
As is every aspect of your life.

She probably didn't. But the words are 100% true and apply to our country all the way. We definitely aren't "Free" even though we think we are.

?If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind??
― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law




.

Forgive his ignorance. Only on the internet do you find semi retarded human beings who play the "someone is pulling the strings while you are all sheep" routine. It's hysterical.

I would occupy that pussy.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ankbone_33.JPG

Nope. You're too late. Thoughtful people have already begun to have a real discussion that requires reading skills and an attention span. :1orglaugh

The problem is that we were sold this bullshit about America moving towards a service sector economy that has come home to roost. The problem with a service sector economy is that there is nothing tangible produced to support a nation's currency, it's all stuff like "consulting" and "finance", and it's caused massive inflation. Not to mention most well paying service sector jobs require a college degree.


The American quality and standard of living will be stagnate over the next few generations, perhaps it will degrade slightly. As the global economy settles in on some equilibrium, developing nations standards of living will need to increase. Until that time, there is nothing that can be done short of out-and-out protectionism. And no self-respecting American consumerbot would ever go for that.


An 80¢/hr. factory worker in a plant in Xian Shaanxi Province is not improbable, but impossible to compete with today. The only thing to do is wait until his wages go up 400%(better hope they unionize over there and quick), and our buying power comes down 50%. At that point, when he is making about $2.80/hr, then and only then will domestic manufacturing begin to return, and thats in a scenario where some enterprising fool doesn't open a new plant in Burundi, Ethiopia, or the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The American public was never sold on the idea of a service sector economy.

Instead, that concept was shoved down their throats by both political parties.

Let's not forget that had he not flaked out, Ross Perot may well have become this country's first elected third party president on the strength of his condemnation of NAFTA alone.

Since then, both political parties have continued to sing the same song regarding all but a handful of bullshit peripheral issues like "family values" and such.

Bottom line: At present, the ballot box offers no real alternative for a lot of pissed off American voters. Hence, the popularity of, first the teabaggers and now, the Occupy Wall Street movement.

This guy is a fear-mongering moron. No wonder you like him. Birds of a feather.

Almost every one of his idiotic videos is about the end of the world.

Translation: I have no idea what he's saying because I don't have common sense nor a basic understanding of economics, so I'm going to call you a sheep or whatever while I continue my leftist sheep mentality without even attempting a logical argument.

As usual, good show BFT3K.:thumbsup

no one was ever sold the idea of a "service sector" economy. what was pushed was alvin-toffler bs about a third wave information society. while everyone was focused on that carrot unions were crippled and real wage jobs sent overseas. the reality that was left was a service sector economy, because lets face it tech and computer jobs will always be for a small sector of the population.

9-9-9
 

occupy wall street is no different then what happened with the early credit card bangers in porn.

yes it was wrong, but no violence happened. so no one was punished, they got away with it. yes a couple of people were made examples of, but only a SMALL percentage. basically the vast majority of bankers got away with it, and rubbed it in everyone's face when they got the bailout and then all took bonuses.

so I think what everyone is protesting about is that they were all too stupid to get in on it when the getting was good, that there is no real law. Law exists only for those with money. Money buys right. and as much as we all don't want to think that's true, that's the way it is.

Yeah, it was the poor people's fault for not being rich enough to rip-off the poor people.

Cool analogy! :thumbsup

Yea, it was the rich people's fault for living beyond their means. It was the rich people's fault for getting hilariously low ARMs that they couldn't afford. That's the beauty about the left. You don't need to take responsibility for anything, just blame someone else.

I was just a kid during that election. The only thing I remember about Ross Perot is that he reminded me of Frank Perdue - the guy who sold chickens. The fucked up thing is, that's probably all that most people who were adults at the time remember, too. His policies actually made a lot of sense though.

Can you see the world around you, with your head jammed that far up your own ass?

I have to give credit to the people in the white jackets at the mental asylum. They finally got you typing barely coherent sentences, regardless of their stupidity.

The fact that he didn't look like the sort of guy Hanes hires to model their shirts didn't help any. What really killed his chances though was his dropping out of and then reentering the race.

That's when he made it breathtakingly easy for his opponents to portray him as a headcase.


Damn straight they did :thumbsup

The message came from activist (and traitor) Melissa Brookstone,

Cool, here's one back for you...

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...treet-20111018