GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Christopher Hitchens Died Today. He was only 62 - Please Retweet This So We Can Cure Cancer (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1050097)

TheSquealer 12-16-2011 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 18635071)
I agree that these things help prevent it, I follow them myself, but it doesn't justify you soap boxing here and saying he got what he deserved either.

I didn't say he got what he deserved. He made a choice and knew that choice had consequences. Even he knew that. He willfully put himself at risk, he paid the price.

uno 12-16-2011 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 18635587)
Wow, you're getting desperate. You only let yourself down by this type of childish behaviour

Anyway, the Vaccine/Cancer information is there for those who want to read it, and you've posted some anti Jew stuff too, which I and the majority of people here have no interest in :2 cents:

Grow Up!!

Yes, porno jew is quite the anti-semite. :upsidedow

uno 12-16-2011 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 18635601)
Your logic is like a great dragon; it doesn't exist! The other day I explained to you what an Ad Hominem was, but you clearly didn't take it on board. This is why your world view is fundamentally flawed and inaccurate, because you've built it up based on a logical fallacy i.e. incorrect logical principle.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-hominem.html

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

1. Person A makes claim X.
2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
3. Therefore A's claim is false.

The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).

Not only did you miss the point, but you managed to avoid his perfectly valid question.

campimp 12-16-2011 08:16 PM

it is sad to see anyone die that young, no matter what the cause.

as an ex-smoker i hope that someday, someone out there is able to figure this whole thing out.

it doesn't look very promising, but so many people, and families have been so badly affected by cancer over the years... its pretty sad.

porno jew 12-16-2011 09:19 PM

you use as a source someone who believes that that vaccines are a jewish conspiracy to poison and kill gentiles. since you are anti-vaccine and use mullins as a reference it is fair to ask if you also believe in that theory.

so do you also believe vaccines are a jewish conspiracy to kill gentiles? yes or no.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 18635601)
Your logic is like a great dragon; it doesn't exist! The other day I explained to you what an Ad Hominem was, but you clearly didn't take it on board. This is why your world view is fundamentally flawed and inaccurate, because you've built it up based on a logical fallacy i.e. incorrect logical principle.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-hominem.html

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

1. Person A makes claim X.
2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
3. Therefore A's claim is false.

The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).


porno jew 12-16-2011 09:23 PM

more from eustace mullins who wehateporn feels is a legitimate source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustace_Mullins#Works

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustace...iracy_Theories

Many of Mullins' writings show a preoccupation with the idea that the Jews of the world are in a state of war with Christianity and Western civilization, and that Communism, Zionism, and International finance were Jewish tools to subjugate gentile populations. He also believed that in general the interaction between Jews and gentiles was parasitic. He believed that gentiles like the Rockefellers were also parasitic, but that ultimately the World Order was controlled by Jews and that the end goal of this Jewish oligarchy is "World Zionism."[citation needed]
He believed that the French Revolution and the Congress of Vienna were key events in which Jews, via conspiratorial mechanations, overpowered Gentile governments.[citation needed] He believed that other key moments in the establishment of Jewish power were the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Bolshevik Revolution, and the establishment of the state of Israel.

His October, 1952 article "Adolf Hitler: An Appreciation" was mentioned in a report by the House Un-American Activities Committee[20] In it, he espoused anti-Semitic views and expressed the belief that America owes a debt to Hitler.[citation needed]

In a tract called The Secret Holocaust, Mullins stated that the account of the Nazi extermination of the Jews is implausible, and that it is a cover story for the Soviet massacres of Christians, which he believed was led by a conspiracy of "international Jews" and instigated for the purpose of killing Gentiles.[citation needed]
In 1968, Mullins authored the tract, The Biological Jew, which he claimed was an "objective" analysis of the forces behind the "decline" of Western Culture. He claimed that the main influence that people were overlooking in their analysis of world affairs was "parasitism". He began by describing parasitism in the animal kingdom. He then commented on the work of the macro-historians Oswald Spengler and Arnold Toynbee (who he said was a ripoff of Spengler and a "shabbez-goi historian"), and proposed that if we look at society as if it were an organism, then the Jews would be equivalent to parasites overtaking that organism. He states that Jews "instinctively" want to control the world. He spent the rest of the book attacking Americans for their supposed docility, ranting about America's subservience to the Jews, and predicting that America would be in total cultural decline by the 1980s.

uno 12-16-2011 09:35 PM

a short clip but still showed a lot, imo


porno jew 12-16-2011 09:36 PM

hitchens was a great entertainer. sullivan is a clown.

porno jew 12-16-2011 09:46 PM

hitchens was at his best with his literary reviews and writing. he was a literature geek at heart who liked to fight and get bloody with the great cultural currents of his time.

his center was combat. he liked to fight, and he picked sides often just to be the perceived underdog.

uno 12-16-2011 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18635851)
hitchens was a great entertainer. sullivan is a clown.

What problem do you have with Sullivan?

porno jew 12-16-2011 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 18635858)
What problem do you have with Sullivan?

was one of the most offensive neocon chickenhawks during the bush years. but since he is generally spineless and changes his ideals whenever the political winds change i guess people would not know that now.

uno 12-16-2011 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18635865)
was one of the most offensive neocon chickenhawks during the bush years. but since he is generally spineless and changes his ideals whenever the political winds change i guess people would not know that now.

I disagree, respectfully. Him along with many other staunch republicans pulled an anti-RR and said something similar to "I didn't leave the republican party, it left me."

He's a Brit and he's open to changing his mind on things and I dig that mental flexibility as long as he can back it up, and he has in long essay form en masse.

porno jew 12-16-2011 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 18635867)
I disagree, respectfully. Him along with many other staunch republicans pulled an anti-RR and said something similar to "I didn't leave the republican party, it left me."

He's a Brit and he's open to changing his mind on things and I dig that mental flexibility as long as he can back it up, and he has in long essay form en masse.

he never was a republican. he was always a communist/trotskyist until 9/11.

porno jew 12-16-2011 10:13 PM

his brother peter, also a very good writer and thinker, although i don't agree with him, was always a traditional conservative.

i hope they made up before he died.

uno 12-16-2011 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18635879)
he never was a republican. he was always a communist/trotskyist until 9/11.

O_o Margaret Thatcher is one of his heroes.

uno 12-16-2011 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18635881)
his brother peter, also a very good writer and thinker, although i don't agree with him, was always a traditional conservative.

i hope they made up before he died.

I'll have to check him out. Only have so many hours in my 36+ hour sleep cycle.

porno jew 12-16-2011 10:20 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...-Hitchens.html

marlboroack 12-17-2011 02:45 AM

If the world had a cancer day, there can and will be a cure... Everyone who has fame in their can can promote something for donations.. The people who promote "help find cures for cancer" are honestly idiots. Even in donations you need a marketing scheme.

Current cancer victim here.

mikesinner 12-17-2011 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 18635603)
The one above is an interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman, former chief of the Merck Vaccine Division, whether it's on YouTube, TV, Radio, wherever, it's still him :2 cents:

Let me do some research about him and I'll get back to you in this post.

porno jew 12-17-2011 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner (Post 18636161)
Let me do some research about him and I'll get back to you in this post.

hillman was a great scientists who saved millions of lives. in that video conspiracy kooks misinterpret a joke and think he is saying he put cancer in vaccines or some nonsense.

it really is a crime where these sad delusional conspiracy nutballs can slander a man whose discoveries have literally saved millions by hearing voices and putting words in his mouth.

CaptainHowdy 12-17-2011 06:39 AM

Funny how you try to give transcendence to an atheist death ...

uno 12-17-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18635881)
his brother peter, also a very good writer and thinker, although i don't agree with him, was always a traditional conservative.

i hope they made up before he died.

Oh, I was talking about Andrew Sullivan.

porno jew 12-17-2011 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 18636413)
Oh, I was talking about Andrew Sullivan.

despite whatever he pretends to be now, sullivan was one of the worst and most obnoxious neocons during the iraq war / war on terror years. that's why i think he is a dirtbag. he is an opportunistic spineless political chameleon. i have no idea what he is pretending to be now. just thought he was scum back in the day.

why do you like his work?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123