as long as they don't pull any funds from illegal aliens it should be fine Dave. and normally I would agree with because what gov in it's right mind would spend money drive a profitable tax source out of the economey.... well... except LA that is...

probably nothing happens until you have a nutcase like Donny Long who catches something and goes bananas

Companies should hire talent that is married, like my husband and I are, then it won't really matter if we use condoms or not. There are a lot of couples in porn just like us, and for once maybe the pro side of porn can actually have some real life sexual arousal in the scenes.

That condom law applies to everyone--even married couples. Sorry.

No need for them to look at all the porn online, just the 25 to 30 big companies that still shoot all the time, and whose producers are foolish enough to brag that they aren't going to comply on boards like these.

Well that sucks!!!!! Really :(

Yes I do, I bet my total holdings are bigger than yours, and why the fuck would I care how high my post count was?

They just posted this all over and it clearly says "filmed within LA". There are numerous places where you can be arrested for any obscenity - unless it is adopted as a federal statute and enforced it will not apply to scenes filmed outside LA.

before they do that, they will have to legalize porn in every state. Until then, they can't enforce a law or by doing so they acknowledge that it is legal in all 50 states which will never happen.
ds

not....
ds

I agree :)

How explicit is the language in the law regarding 'condom usage.'

Does the performer have to wear a condom for the entire duration of the scene? If the performer wears a condom and it breaks, is the crew responsible to stop the shoot and get a second condom? What happens if the condom is worn to completion but the fluid is expelled from it after intercourse has ended? What happens if it's a group scene and some performers are wearing condoms but others are not? Does that comply? How about oral sex only, is a condom required?

It would seem to me that writing legislation of this sort would almost automatically include a gazillion loopholes unless a legislator wanted to sit down and write one of the most crass few paragraphs of all-inclusive text ever to become part of statutory law.