GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Porn being moved to members only areas by law?

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Porn being moved to members only areas by law? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1065260)

fiddy under 18 porn consumers

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18900183)

Silly statement. Yes we do, otherwise toys would have lead paint and sharp things that could harm a child, children's food could be contaminated. The Government needs to regulate children are strapped in and sit in the rear seat. Otherwise stupid people wouldn't bother and they might cause an accident that kills you and your child. Extreme example, but it happens.

Another one, law on driving. Shall we leave that to a parents discretion or should the Government impose a law on who's kids can drive?

No one is reduced to a bloody mass or a corpse because they saw naked people fucking ... There is no imminent danger in porn viewing so there is no parallel in the argument.

If anything, the government's responsibility should be to educate parents on how to use parental filters -- parents should be able to decide what their children view.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 18900326)

No one is reduced to a bloody mass or a corpse because they saw naked people fucking ... There is no imminent danger in porn viewing so there is no parallel in the argument.

Whether or not it harms children is not the point. The point is can a politician get support with this sitting duck of a problem. "I don't want my kids exposed to gay porn" or whatever. Every parent will agree. Just a silly example but the porn industry is a popular target and an easy one. :2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 18900326)

If anything, the government's responsibility should be to educate parents on how to use parental filters -- parents should be able to decide what their children view.

Another easy argument to make is that filters for porn are completely un-effective. We are all computer savvy on this board but most parents are not we have to view it from a realistic point of view. Most kids are much more computer savvy than their parents. How hard is it for the kid to install another browser? Filters ARE very very effective if you are stupid, but at the same time they are easy to go around.

Im not arguing with you, I am just pointing out that its an easy case to make against filters...

let me distill the arguments being made in this thread: if the government put parental filters on porn somehow it's going to make people buy my crappy content again.

it's quite funky to read over and over again how something can't work that is reality in the second biggest market for porn since years

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 18900723)

Whether or not it harms children is not the point. The point is can a politician get support with this sitting duck of a problem. "I don't want my kids exposed to gay porn" or whatever. Every parent will agree. Just a silly example but the porn industry is a popular target and an easy one. :2 cents:

Another easy argument to make is that filters for porn are completely un-effective. We are all computer savvy on this board but most parents are not we have to view it from a realistic point of view. Most kids are much more computer savvy than their parents. How hard is it for the kid to install another browser? Filters ARE very very effective if you are stupid, but at the same time they are easy to go around.

Im not arguing with you, I am just pointing out that its an easy case to make against filters...

:thumbsup

No politician will listen to us when deciding what to do with online porn.