![]() |
lol ... stop it ...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
On with the new witch hunt! :thumbsup Maybe this one will turn out differently than the last 20 that failed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I find it odd that people here blame employees for the misdeeds of their employers.
I've never seen anything to indicate that Tam made decisions not to pay people, same is true for Michael O when he was at Epassporte. Employees who work for companies, good or bad, that stop doing business still have to make a living, pay bills etc. Why not Tam? |
Quote:
Not sure why you are attacking teencat with this weak sauce, but it comes across to me as being an MR apologist and that blows. |
Quote:
Seriously? Are you telling me that Tam and everyone else at MR was taken in by the whole "Well, we're in the right, we did nothing wrong, but we are going to withdraw from GFY because of the baseless accusations we're getting over there." Give your fucking head a shake. If she's that dumb then no one should be hiring her anyways. |
I've never dealt with Tam nor MR so I have no knowledge of who knew what and when.
Do you? Kind of silly to assume things about this, I'd think her first obligation is and was to earn a living. But as you said, "So who knows". |
Quote:
|
A solid response to a discussion.
Always a winner. In 3rd grade at least. |
If there hadn't been a million posts in recent weeks talking shit about her, this might have been an ok hire.
I hear James Holmes is smart and needs a job. |
Quote:
Perhaps some doubter could use the excuse you gave if a video was used, it is certainly possible. However, if a video is flawed, per your suggestion, then what does that make screenshots? That means, based on what you said, both are idiotic. I won't argue that and for the sake of debate say you are correct, your logic is sound. So then if both methods are both equally worthless and idiotic, which we both now agree on, then there is no proof at all of anything. There are only people with charges on their statement and they don't know how they got there. They can not prove they did not click anything or miss a x-sale, and they can not prove the charges were made illegally. This is all based on your logic, which I am willing to agree with. The next question you have to ask is, if all of these charges were made illegally, why did everyone who used this tactic get away with it and continue to do it to this day? Where are Visa / Master Card, and the Feds? You would think they would be all over this. Maybe they are. Maybe they are not. Maybe they already did? Maybe there is not enough proof? Or maybe every link and xsale is accounted for? I honestly don't know the answer, it just seems odd to me that such a thing has allegedly taken place, at such scale, and nothing came of it legally. I'm sure I can not the only one to think this, am I? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://livereviews.com/ |
Quote:
Just at a glance, noticed this one from SOBV: http://livereviews.com/1988/Adult/Sh...yboy-Pros.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Teencats screenshots are of course proof of nothing on their own. They could be photoshopped, etcetera ad nauseam. However, you have to consider the provenance. Meaning, where are they coming from, consider the source, whats the motive, etcetera. These sorts of evaluations happen every day in the real world. On the balance of probabilities in this case I find them to be very believable. If you take into account all the other evidence presented against MR and co. over the years it becomes even more believable, at least to me. You seem to be working very hard to excuse MR either that or you're a world-class shitty logician. You got one thing right though. For someone who doesn't want to see the facts, MR is blameless because actual standalone proof would take seizing MR's systems and records and maybe even compelling insiders to testify. Perhaps you should have withdrawn from GFY with them? It seems you both live in a world where MR did no wrong. At my count there's you, Tam, the rest of MR, and that's about it. |
Quote:
2) You keep speaking of "facts" but there are none. If such facts exist and are solid, surly they or any other company would have been raided or shut down by now. To my knowledge, none of the adult companies in question have been through either, so where does that leave it all? To me that says, until such a day comes where they do get raided or shut down, to take the webmaster witch hunts with a grain of salt. 3) Simple question: Was your card banged? If yes, prove it. If no, then STFU. Look, I have no idea who's dirty or who's not, and I really don't care. At this stage in the game I just assume everyone is dirty to some degree. But I know a witch hunt and a bully when I see one, and that is exactly what I see happening here with Tam. She made a mistake and moved on. Maybe she's guilty of making a few mistakes, but that still doesn't mean she cuts the checks. I assume you've never made a mistake? I have. I've made a lot of them. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
After all the screen shots, after all the rumors, logic still says if it were true, there would be legal consequences. If that day comes, I will believe in the facts gathered by law enforcement. If that day doesn't come, it really makes everyone out to look like a bunch of morons who can't get past a few xsales and 1-click options. Time will tell. It doesn't matter to me either way. Quote:
Nothing any of you have said would hold up in a court of law and that is exactly why none of this has yet to see a court. There is no case. And that has nothing to do with the fact that I believe or don't believe your accusations. When there is a case, if there is a case, we'll all know about it because it will be all over the news. And if that is how it goes down, so be it, I could care less. If not, you all look like witch hunting fools and I could care less. Get the picture? This is how silly your evidence looks: http://stoppornpiracy.com/boards/proof.jpg :2 cents: |
Quote:
No spam. No extra charges. How is it that everyone else gets hit with spam and hidden charges but a random, unannounced join from this site didn't? EscortBiz is very reputable and trustworthy. That is his site. Please explain. |
|
So what's your thoughts on MediaRevenue DWB? Solid, honest company?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
They may not be as thorough as yours, but I just spent 2 minutes on that review site and found these sites that were also SOBV properties. Not one had unauthorized charges. http://livereviews.com/1988/Adult/Sh...y-Hardons.html http://livereviews.com/1988/Adult/Sh...-Shemales.html http://livereviews.com/1988/Adult/Sh...anny-Edge.html http://livereviews.com/1988/Adult/Sh...Squirting.html What are the odds? I'm not saying it doesn't happen, as I believe JJ was up to no good, but I see a site that is meticulously recording the entire process, with 5 different joins with no problems. Was it luck of the draw or is everyone complaining a dumb ass who can't navigate a join page or members area? Perhaps your data will answer that question. My guess is there are a lot of sites they reviewed that fell under the same umbrella. If I gave a fuck, I would go find them all for you. |
dwb, why dont you want to open your eyes and see the facts? not only once they lied here, and got caught. why do you think my teencat nick was unbanned? you defend them? do you get a blowjob for each post you made?
|
Quote:
Sorry, but I don't live and die based on who gets banned on GFY and for what. I don't know who said what, who lied, who didn't, and who is doing what, unless it involved me. Disappointing, I know, but that's the way it is. Maybe some things we said and done I'm not aware of. Sorry, I have a life and it doesn't revolve around the target of the latest GFY witch hunt. Perhaps you can clue me in with all the juicy details? The only thing I've said repeatedly is that I'd like to see real evidence of whatever they are being accused of. I've been asking for this for four years every since all of this drama publicly started. |
Quote:
Since you keep chanting the mantra of 'where is the real evidence', then please tell us what would be "real evidence" from your perspective? And how would anyone not on the inside go about collecting it? Oh, it's not feasible? Welcome to the real world where we have to go with "on the balance of probabilities" rather than "more certain than the type of proof the scientists for the higgs boson have presented". Just FYI, you aren't doing Tam's case any good. You have a technical point about the evidence, but its pedantic and useless. You blathering on reinforces the point that, the only person who could come to the conclusion that MR and Tam are not dirty is someone who is as determined as you are to come down on that side of the argument. What that means is, you are actually hurting her shreds of credibility with your hair splitting. So, congrats. PS. Your argument would also apply to Chris Mallick btw. So apparently in DWBland he's innocent too. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'd said it at least 100 times over the past four years, record it. It worked for LiveReviews.com, why can't it work for someone else? Or have them do it. Perhaps they would take on just one more review for shits and giggles. Again, and I will make this red so you will have to pay attention to it, I am not saying it is or is not happening. I'm saying prove it. And I've repeatedly said how. But please, just ignore all of that and say I support whatever company fits your need and that talking to me is like talking to a brick wall. Quote:
She has a new job already. Guess the trolls lose again. Shucks. And I'm sure her new employer was hanging on every word I said before they made their final decision to hire her. :1orglaugh Seriously, some of you guys are funny fuckers. Quote:
Great logic there. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Now I understand why you are posting anonymously. |
Quote:
|
great, if stunner media is in no way joined to mediarevenue, why lloyd is working also for mediarevenue mobile program? come on tam, what is the story about it? :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Time will tell, but it's a risk I won't be taking. |
lloyd, owner of stunner bucks? listed on mediarevenue program mrsexmobile.com/external.php?page=contact&nats=, also helping people with boyfriendbucks on the mediarevenue forum ... come on, we all are totally stupid ...
|
Quote:
|
Tam will be here soon to deny everything.
|
I suspect that TAM may have worked for ePassporte!!!!
|
Quote:
When I had payout issues I contact Tam, got the run around, got ignored, lucky for me I know who else to contact and I did, Tam apologized really hard but that was just to keep her job, she is useless, I will never use her, just one of those affiliate reps going around from one program to another not being able to do shit other then the usual grunt work every well trained monkey could achieve. I know those are harsh words, but you gotta call shit by it's name, no matter how much perfume you spread over the pile of shit, it still stinks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123