![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i think though it needs to be more expensive to increase the pressure to develop more efficient technologies and when you can afford to drive a gas guzzler - go for it. even at $10 a gallon companies like Porsche make record profits |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Canada has the third largest crude petroleum reserves in the world, yet prices here are insane. Its fucking ridiculous that our Government continues to fuck their own citizens up the ass just so they can be first in line to suck foreign cock. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seriously most of you guys have no idea of the timelines and scale involved in hydrocarbon exploration and the macroeconomics of oil. Neither Obama nor Romney is going to change the price at the pump more than 1% one way or the other with regulation, certainly not within the timeframe of a presidential term (unless they socialise it, which they won't). |
Oil Vender and Crack Venders Do Business the Same :D
|
Quote:
I just picked up a used Dodge 2500 Truck with a 8 Liter V10 cheap |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wait 10 years and hear the excuses they make for the price of solar or wind going up. "Sun was not as bright as usual this week", "winds died down", "dog ate my solar panel"... |
Quote:
Doesn't help blaming oil companies - blame OPEC if you don't like higher gas prices. So yes drilling for more more oil onshore will increase supply and should lower prices assuming OPEC doesn't lower output to counter that move. The oil market isn't a free market |
I hope to be solar by the end of this year at my home; and, off the power grid at my offices by the end of next year. The feds and city have some serious rebates and tax credits right now that cover 65 to 70% of the install costs.
|
Quote:
The public and gas station owners get fucked. Did you know that gas station owners earn on average 1-2 cents per gal profit? Nice margin. Why do you think they all have become kwiki marts? Only real chance for profit. |
Quote:
you must not be american! lol |
Quote:
The price you pay at the pump is what OPEC wants you to pay. Nothing can change that except for a nationalized oil industry (something we should have done a long time ago, but likely never will). |
Gas and oil are commodities, the less around the higher the price.
Look at the Diamond market to see how it's not in the oil companies interest to flood the market with oil and gas. It's also a resource that isn't going to last for ever, so making it cheaper so people can consume it faster is also a stupid way to go. About as stupid as giving away the product for free to get more sales. So not surprised so many here think it a good idea. :oh crap!!! If you want to save on your fuel bill, use less. It really is that simple. |
I think you guys are right. Let's just leave all this oil and gas in the ground and see if we can come up with something new. In the meantime let's watch what happens when the cost of food goes through the roof as transporting it becomes more and more expensive with the price of fuel going up.
Talk about a tax on the middle class... Or we could read this news report from May 2012 talking about the fact that oil companies have now made GIANT discoveries of oil right here in the U.S. that could make us energy independent and have no need to import oil. http://www.usatoday.com/money/indust...NCE/54977254/1 Effectively buying us plenty of time to develop new technologies in green energy without having to make it so expensive to fill the tank for lower and middle class Americans (rich people don't care if it costs $100 to fill the tank) |
Quote:
Far better than drill everywhere and running the US on it's own oil and running out. The price dropping is a myth. It's not in the oil companies interests to go around drilling everywhere to supply you with cheap oil. For them it's better to get more money for the same production, than the same money for more production. You seem to be complaining about prices a lot recently. As you're rich I wonder why. If you truly want to cut your fuel bill, buy a smaller car, get a bike for short trips, or one of these http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/best-worst.shtml and your gas bill will plummet. Much faster than any saving at the pumps. And if more Americans drove these cars, fuel imports will drop like a stone. As for food prices. How about the Government taxes you more so they can give the farmers more in the grants. Or really hit farmers with huge fines for employing illegal labour so they have to employ US citizens and pass the cost onto you. I hear about the immigrant problem from a lot of posters here. As the OP says. They can drill and drill, the price isn't going down much on a barrel and cents at the pump. You need to find new ways to save money. Here's more ideas. http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/solar.html http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-a-box-sunfish http://www.siliconsolar.com/diy-solar-panel-kits.html You live in the desert, the sun hardly stops shining. For a few $100s you could cut your electricity bill. Which it seems is your prime interest today. |
Whatever happened to sawgrass ethanol? |
Quote:
In the meantime, you should maybe consider going to a tanning salon or something. I guess it's kind of like an illusory type thing, but having a little bit color tends to make your muscles appear as if they're more defined. No sense in hiding all your hard work under a pale mound of flesh, right? Be sure to ask for a low intensity bed. It may take longer but if you do it that way you'll end up with a nice, natural looking tan and that's what you want. Nobody wants an orange Robbie. Just stay patient, don't get frustrated, and keep up the good work! We're all very proud of you! |
Quote:
|
What will make people more fuel efficient and waste less?
More expensive oil or cheaper oil? ************************** What will make people go to alternative sources of power? More expensive oil or cheaper oil? ************************** What will make people develop more alternative sources of power? More expensive oil or cheaper oil? It really is a no brainer. |
Quote:
|
Based on this 2010 study, global population is expected to increase by 1.4 billion by 2030. That's like the world now minus 20 years of natural resources plus one more China.
Projected increase of just the top ten most populous countries is 676MM. The top ten countries are India, China US, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Brazil, Bangladesh, Russia, and Mexico. They're not driving hybrids in Bangladesh. How much is a Prius? $25K? The combined GDP per capita of India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is just under $15K. 8 of the 10 are perceived to be going through periods of industrialization where more resources are needed to fuel growth. The trucks being used to haul shit to some construction site at the next Nigerian megapolis have more impact on the global market than do the F150s that middle American douchebags use to haul their pretend boats to the pretend lake. If every middle American soccer mom goes to a Toyota dealership this afternoon to trade in their gas guzzling SUV for a Prius, there's a small chance it would cause the price of a barrel to go down by a few pennies, but the 'impact' on oil prices would be short lasting because the global market is more defined with the actions of one billion industrializing chinamen. |
US Exports Oil
Quote:
http://zfacts.com/node/426 Several East Coast refineries have closed down. So re-open them. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/02...stop-exporting Also first the first time in decades, in 2011 the US was a net exporter of oil http://www.advisorperspectives.com/c...klin_40412.php |
Quote:
Once you produce for the price you want to produce (high) you're increasing the global cost of production. Quote:
Organizations such as OPEC weren't institutionalized to help the world, they were institutionalized to make the most money from oil in a cartel, that's where the rules are made, that's where the supply is regulated for someone to be able to make the most $$$. Quote:
These Giant discoveries always "happen" with the right timing, not only that there's supposingly much, much more potential crude oil that can be drilled with the ever more modern technologies (that can again only be financed by those who have enough gold since they control the oil market). It's that those who have the gold make the rules, and every move, anything that goes widespread in public media as a part of someone's political agenda simply has to make sense $$$ wise. Once there would threaten a serious shift / political will towards alternative energies there may as well be yet another "giant discovery" to fullfill the political agenda of those, that were bought by the oil companies in the first place. The US crowd will always hail to anyone who offers them 5c off gallon and more oil drilling, there you have the perfect synergy between those two - politics and oil industry. |
Quote:
|
OK lets not let facts get in the way,
Canada and Mexico supply America with over sixty percent of their oil imports, who owns the Canadian oil fields..... American Companies! You would ask why are American companies extracting oil from Northern Alberta, simple thats where the oil is. Texas and other American states have run out of new oil reserves, Keystone pipeline is designed to keep the refineries in the Southern USA in the money by taking the bitumen oil from Alberta, refining it, and selling at market price. There is no reason to do this other than it will save on shipping and increase profits of the oil sands. If you believe it will lower gas prices.... well then I have some magic beans for sale as well. The other hard truth is that oil needs to be $75 - $80 a barrell or more for the Albera oil sands to be profitable. I highly doubt we will ever see it dip below this ever again, because AMERICAN and Chinese oil companies have almost a trillion dollar investment in the oil sands and we all know oil companies don't lose money |
|
Quote:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...275032794.html And that's just one of the massive oil finds that new technology is making happen...but the Obama administration blocked. Oil creates jobs. High paying jobs. And jobs are what we need in the U.S. Everybody keeps saying "oh, it won't work". Well, there is only one way to find out. Common sense tells me that if you create high paying jobs and lower the cost of energy...the economy will roar. Maybe I just have a different idea of how business works and how to be successful than some of you guys do. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=MaDalton;19175926]http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/
Did you bother to notice that North AMerican oil is about $20 cheaper per barrel than European ?? |
Quote:
Quote:
So are you buying yours this year Paul? |
Whatever did happen to hydrogen cars?
I remember back in the 1990's that Arnold Schwarzenegger had his Hummer converted to Hydrogen and work was supposed to begin on Hydrogen stations to replace gas stations. I guess the oil companies bought that shit up and shut it down too? Wouldn't surprise me. Electric cars have been around for over a hundred years and they still aren't used. Hell, the entire taxi cab fleet of New York City were electric cars in 1897!!! And somehow, Detroit auto makers can't figure out how to do it right in 2012. lol |
yet still the price of oil and liquids stays at historical highs, and goes down when the economy falters, and goes right back up when the economy strengthens - which appears to cause the economy to falter, again.
the so called "oil paradox" - if supply is sound, and EROI is not a factor, why does the economy falter when the barrel price jumps, as it has repeatedly since 2005? and every little political squabble or storm sends the price up again. and gas prices in the US were at a record high this past weekend, highest ever for a labor day. for some reason reality is not going along with the approved storyline, which is that EROI doesn't matter, and depletion doesn't matter. lets see what the future brings. we's all be happy if the republicans and the oil companies can bring back the cheap oil age. why don't they? what's stopping them? |
Quote:
They are making some interesting new breakthrus in hydrogen - but - as a nation we don't support it, and we have lost the ability and will to innovate. As a nation, we have given up on new infrastructure development. Sure, we will build old technology like pipelies for oil or gas, but we have lost the ability to build new infrastructure like smart grids or hyrdogen transport. We give the petro industry tax breaks for exploration - and they make a find, typically small, a billion barrels or so - then cap the well, because it's not cost effective to extract and bring to market at todays price levels. Americans made the wrong choices 30 years ago, under Reagan, and we will be paying the price for that this century. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123