GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ask the wealthy to pay a little more (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1083172)

GrantMercury 09-26-2012 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks (Post 19213438)
All rich people have to do to lower their tax burden is to put their earnings to work, as they become expenses that fuel new growth.

Right. :thumbsup

GrantMercury 09-26-2012 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19213304)
There isnt as much waste as imagined. The wars are a very big part of debt and W kept it off the books and Obama put it on the books.

Right. :thumbsup

Robbie 09-27-2012 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19213386)
Nope spending with decreased rev is the problem. .

How about just cut spending and bring our troops home and quit fighting wars everywhere when nobody has attacked us.

End the drug war. Stop pork barrel spending.

The govt. is spending 10.6 BILLION dollars per day. And borrowing almost 4 BILLION of that every damn day.

How can you justify such a thing?

We are not at war with anybody. Our country hasn't been invaded since the War of 1812. WE do the invading since then.

What is raising taxes on the wealthiest people by 4 or 5 % going to do? Nothing. Absolutely NOTHING.

Not only that...but ALL of those wealthiest people (including Warren Hypocrite Buffet) make the majority of their money on Capital Gains. So sure...go ahead and raise the income tax rate. They still won't pay one thin dime more.

The whole premise is stupid and is designed for the Obama campaign to get a populist vote from people who just can't stand that somebody else has it better than them. It's class warfare plain and simple.

Cut the spending. How can anybody in this thread possibly justify 10.6 BILLION dollars a day in spending??? You can't. And none of you ever address it. You just stay on the Democrat talking points. And those against taxes stay on the Republican talking points. It's all deception.

The Feds are spending more money than I can even wrap my head around.

Isn't Romney supposed to be "filthy" rich? What's he worth..a couple hundred million dollars?
Well the Federal govt. is spending 6.85 million dollars PER MINUTE. Wrap your heads around that.

So in 29 minutes the federal govt. spends the same amount of Romney's entire wealth.

And Romney is the "filthy" rich one who didn't really "earn" his money? lol

NO! It's not rich people who are the problem. The feds are the filthiest and the richest.

When I was a little kid in the 60's and a teen in the 70's, my generation was taught to NEVER trust govt.
But it seems that the next generation just LOVES them some government. Sad. :(

I'd like some freedom
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/.

12clicks 09-27-2012 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19213191)
I don't consider someone making $250k a year wealthy. Not even $500k. That is where I differ with Obama.

Someone making $15 million a year is wealthy. I'd personally put "rich" in the 1-5 category.

Either way, the fact that I make a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of those people and pay more doesn't make sense.

Flat tax does that but will likely never happen.

you don't pay more. you pay a pittance while Mitt pays millions.

crockett 09-27-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19213186)
Sure Mitt can. How about those making over $250k but under $20m.

Seems funny you worry about guys making over $250k but not about people whom make $30-50k. That big building you were showing off a month or two back that you bought for your business to grow in.. How many of the people whom work for in that new building, make over $250k?

Now of course I don't know your business, but I'd be willing to wager a hunch that your average employee that works for your company, isn't making over $50k a year, much less $250k. These guys working for you are probably pretty hard workers or at the very least dependable and allow your corporation to function and compete on the world market.

Now these workers of yours, most likely pay a higher tax rate and live on much lower wage than these people you are so worried about. Are you honestly trying to say that people making 250k a year couldn't afford to pay the same tax percentage as your own workers?

The workers that make it possible for your company to produce it's products?

12clicks 09-27-2012 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19213227)
That can be blamed on the tax system that has been in effect since... well forever. These days we argue over % not total contributions. This country would be a shit hole if everybody paid say $12k a year in taxes in matter how much they made. You don't want to live in a shit hole, do you? This country wouldn't be what it is today if it didn't have % based tax system.

true, so instead of hating on the people propping up your standard of living and demanding they pay even more for you, stop fucking around on the internet and get a job that will actually pay you money.

12clicks 09-27-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19213499)
And the top 1% hold how much wealth?

how ever much they earned.

go get a fucking job, scumbag.

Tom_PM 09-27-2012 11:33 AM

You dumbasses are missing out on all that free foodstamp money by making more than 1200 bucks a month. Suckers. You could be pocketing a cool 200 bucks a month if you just cut back your hours. Thats how you game the system, not with your fancy millionaire tax loopholes and offshore .. thingies. Once we put a stop to that.. we achieve... dead poor people.

12clicks 09-27-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19214626)
Seems funny you worry about guys making over $250k but not about people whom make $30-50k. That big building you were showing off a month or two back that you bought for your business to grow in.. How many of the people whom work for in that new building, make over $250k?

Now of course I don't know your business, but I'd be willing to wager a hunch that your average employee that works for your company, isn't making over $50k a year, much less $250k. These guys working for you are probably pretty hard workers or at the very least dependable and allow your corporation to function and compete on the world market.

Now these workers of yours, most likely pay a higher tax rate and live on much lower wage than these people you are so worried about. Are you honestly trying to say that people making 250k a year couldn't afford to pay the same tax percentage as your own workers?

The workers that make it possible for your company to produce it's products?

there's no need to pay you and your kind more money than you're worth just because you're too stupid to succeed.
the average HOUSEHOLD income in the US is $44k. If you had an ounce of intelligence you'd know that that number won't change by hurting the successful.
Its all you're worth kid.
get used to it

mineistaken 09-27-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19213191)
I don't consider someone making $250k a year wealthy. Not even $500k. That is where I differ with Obama.

Someone making $15 million a year is wealthy. I'd personally put "rich" in the 1-5 category.

Either way, the fact that I make a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of those people and pay more doesn't make sense.

Flat tax does that but will likely never happen.

Earning 250k$ a year in US you can drive brand new ferrari and do not do any serious damage to your life style. So yeah its pretty rich. I can not imagine how could anyone spend 500K/year, thats definitely wealthy/rich zone.

Sly 09-27-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19214644)
Earning 250k$ a year in US you can drive brand new ferrari and do not do any serious damage to your life style. So yeah its pretty rich. I can not imagine how could anyone spend 500K/year, thats definitely wealthy/rich zone.

I would like to see a guy driving a brand-new Ferrari every year on a $250k salary.

12clicks 09-27-2012 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19214644)
Earning 250k$ a year in US you can drive brand new ferrari and do not do any serious damage to your life style. So yeah its pretty rich. I can not imagine how could anyone spend 500K/year, thats definitely wealthy/rich zone.

the perspective from the bottom is not that of reality.

Robbie 09-27-2012 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19214644)
Earning 250k$ a year in US you can drive brand new ferrari and do not do any serious damage to your life style.

WHAT???

A new Ferrari "California" model is $239,000.00 at the dealership here in Vegas.
http://www.penskewynnferrari.com/det...d-9040622.html

I was paying $1200 a month payments when I bought my 2007 corvette. It was around $70,000

So if I multiply those payments by 3 that would be a $3600 car payment per month. And THEN you have to get full coverage insurance. OUCH!

No...you could not earn $250,000 a year and buy a Ferrari and no do serious damage to your lifestyle.

Unless you lived in a rented singlewide trailer and didn't have any kids or a wife or pretty much any other expenses.

Wow. Some of you guys just have never made any money or even realize what it's like to live in the real world.

Sly 09-27-2012 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19214657)
WHAT???

A new Ferrari "California" model is $239,000.00 at the dealership here in Vegas.
http://www.penskewynnferrari.com/det...d-9040622.html

I was paying $1200 a month payments when I bought my 2007 corvette. It was around $70,000

So if I multiply those payments by 3 that would be a $3600 car payment per month. And THEN you have to get full coverage insurance. OUCH!

No...you could not earn $250,000 a year and buy a Ferrari and no do serious damage to your lifestyle.

Unless you lived in a rented singlewide trailer and didn't have any kids or a wife or pretty much any other expenses.

Wow. Some of you guys just have never made any money or even realize what it's like to live in the real world.

You didn't even include maintenance. :-)

Imagine the maintenance that would be required on a Ferrari when used as a daily driver. Which is what this $250k guy would definitely need to do.

Robbie 09-27-2012 11:44 AM

And by the way...since NONE of you will address it:

What does it matter?

The rich will still make their money off of capital gains. So no matter how much you raise the income tax rates it won't matter one tiny bit.
It's all about class warfare and getting the populist vote from people who don't understand that.

And the govt. is SPENDING 10.6 BILLION DOLLARS PER DAY.

Remember the Bill Clinton saying in 1992: "It's the economy stupid".

Well in 2012 it should be: "It's the SPENDING stupid"

Robbie 09-27-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19214661)
You didn't even include maintenance. :-)

Imagine the maintenance that would be required on a Ferrari when used as a daily driver. Which is what this $250k guy would definitely need to do.

I had a buddy who had an old Porsche...and it had TITANIUM brakes! He spent thousands just replacing his brakes.

Yeah...no fucking way you are gonna drive a new or even USED Ferrari on $250k per year income

CDSmith 09-27-2012 11:46 AM

The minte & 12clicks "good cop, bad cop" routine at work. It is a thing of beauty.

The rest of you should be in awe.

crockett 09-27-2012 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 19214643)
I have no rational argument to make, I'm just here to insult everyone while I work at my day job as a roofing contractor. My porn business died because I haven't updated any of my porn sites since 1999. Surfers expecting updated sites are just like govt leeches wanting welfare.. They think just because I send their joins through a circle jerk of pre-checked cross sales that I somehow should give them updated sites.. Bunch of fucking self entitled dick heads.

I earned that sign up money.. wtf did they do?

There I fixed your mindless ranting for you..

12clicks 09-27-2012 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19214678)
There I fixed your mindless ranting for you..

hahahaha, don't project chump.
you're one of life's losers looking to get a pound of flesh from your betters.

when I was poor like you are, I never worried about what other people had or earned. I worried about what I had and earned. odd how you're still you but I've moved on.
you're trash.
you always will be.
thats the difference between success and failure.

mineistaken 09-27-2012 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19214648)
I would like to see a guy driving a brand-new Ferrari every year on a $250k salary.

Lol not a new ferrari every year. I meant you buy it on lease and drive for the next 5 or 10 years. Like Robbie said lease would be 3600$, so ok add everything to 50K year, ok 60, 70 whatever. Yo ustill have 180k/year to live on. Thats king like.

Somebody posted that average american HOUSEHOLD (not even individual) lives on 44k/year. So thats average living. After you lease a ferrari you still have 5 TIMES more than average household. Its not really even possible to spend that much, you would be buying real estate for investmenet here and there if you wanted to spend that amount.

12clicks 09-27-2012 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19214700)
Lol not a new ferrari every year. I meant you buy it on lease and drive for the next 5 or 10 years. Like Robbie said lease would be 3600$, so ok add everything to 50K year, ok 60, 70 whatever. Yo ustill have 180k/year to live on. Thats king like.

Somebody posted that average american HOUSEHOLD (not even individual) lives on 44k/year. So thats average living. After you lease a ferrari you still have 5 TIMES more than average household. Its not really even possible to spend that much, you would be buying real estate for investmenet here and there if you wanted to spend that amount.

moron, someone making $250k a year is paying about 75k in taxes. now he has 175k to spend.
as stated above, unless you live in a trailer or something similar, your lifestyle would have to change.
your 50k a year outlook is not correct

J. Falcon 09-27-2012 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19213296)
You know there use to be a department of the government that looked for wasteful spending, it was cut in the last budget

Ironic you say?

kane 09-27-2012 12:15 PM

Whether $250K is rich or not is a pretty relative statement. A lot of it depends on where you live and what your life is like.

A single guy making $250K and living somewhere that has a very low cost of living could live a life that is very comfortable and feels "rich".

A guy who is married and has a few kids and lives in an expensive city like San Fran or New York might find $250K is barely enough to get by.

mineistaken 09-27-2012 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 19214717)
moron, someone making $250k a year is paying about 75k in taxes. now he has 175k to spend.
as stated above, unless you live in a trailer or something similar, your lifestyle would have to change.
your 50k a year outlook is not correct

fool, even if thats 175k after taxes after leasing that ferrari you still have more money than 2 average households. I ma not saying that you have to buy ferrari, I am saying taht you can easily afford it and still have more money than 2 average households. Just a perspective to see what is 250k/year.

crockett 09-27-2012 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 19214686)
hahahaha, don't project chump.
you're one of life's losers looking to get a pound of flesh from your betters.

when I was poor like you are, I never worried about what other people had or earned. I worried about what I had and earned. odd how you're still you but I've moved on.
you're trash.
you always will be.
thats the difference between success and failure.

The difference between being a chump & being 12clicks is the chump knows when he is being trolled and 12clicks doesn't. I guess the other difference is I don't feel the need to brag about what I've done. I guess my dick is big enough and I'm happy with my life.. I can assume the opposite for yourself.

12clicks 09-27-2012 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19214738)
The difference between being a chump & being 12clicks is the chump knows when he is being trolled and 12clicks doesn't.

if trolling is your life's goal, you're a success. Most of us aspire to better.

what do you do for a living these days again?:1orglaugh

12clicks 09-27-2012 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19214731)
fool, even if thats 175k after taxes after leasing that ferrari you still have more money than 2 average households. I ma not saying that you have to buy ferrari, I am saying taht you can easily afford it and still have more money than 2 average households. Just a perspective to see what is 250k/year.

ah, no. you're wrong. as I said, imagining what you can buy with $250k a year is vastly different than what you can ACTUALLY buy.
and no, you never said, "aht you can easily afford it and still have more money than 2 average households"
you said you could afford it with no effect to your standard of living.

be about it before you talk about it. it makes you look less silly.
:thumbsup

stillsexy 09-27-2012 12:37 PM

i dont mind paying only if it works by doing so

Tom_PM 09-27-2012 12:39 PM

It's class warfare to ask the rich to pay what they paid 12 years ago, but not class warfare to talk about cutting welfare benefits. Aint that a peach.

Rochard 09-27-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19214626)
Seems funny you worry about guys making over $250k but not about people whom make $30-50k. That big building you were showing off a month or two back that you bought for your business to grow in.. How many of the people whom work for in that new building, make over $250k?

Now of course I don't know your business, but I'd be willing to wager a hunch that your average employee that works for your company, isn't making over $50k a year, much less $250k. These guys working for you are probably pretty hard workers or at the very least dependable and allow your corporation to function and compete on the world market.

Now these workers of yours, most likely pay a higher tax rate and live on much lower wage than these people you are so worried about. Are you honestly trying to say that people making 250k a year couldn't afford to pay the same tax percentage as your own workers?

The workers that make it possible for your company to produce it's products?

LOL, great comments.

What Minte doesn't understand is that he didn't build his business. His business was built on the work of his employees. If it wasn't for the people working for him he wouldn't be in business.

Minte wants us to tax him and his business less and put the bulk of the tax responsibility on the bulk of the people that barely clear $50k a year. Minte thinks if we tax him less he'll be encouraged to hire another person making $50k a year while he makes another $400k off of this new employee's work, which is pointless - Minte will still have money to blow no matter what.

Minte has it backwards. I don't hire and fire people based on tax breaks, but instead on need. If I need to hire two people to complete a task in six months I hire two people; I don't wait until it's going to be beneficial tax wise before hiring people. At the same time, if we double the amount of taxes Minte is paying and lower the taxes that his employees making $50k a year pay, chances are he'll still buy that fancy new car he was planning to buy and still take that vacation and all of his employees will be making more money and spending more money - which in turn generates more tax dollars and more money pumped into the economy. Win win.

12clicks 09-27-2012 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19214763)
It's class warfare to ask the rich to pay what they paid 12 years ago, but not class warfare to talk about cutting welfare benefits. Aint that a peach.

its class warfare to ask your betters to pay something that 47% of you don't pay.

PornoMonster 09-27-2012 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19214597)
How about just cut spending and bring our troops home and quit fighting wars everywhere when nobody has attacked us.

End the drug war. Stop pork barrel spending.

The govt. is spending 10.6 BILLION dollars per day. And borrowing almost 4 BILLION of that every damn day.

How can you justify such a thing?

We are not at war with anybody. Our country hasn't been invaded since the War of 1812. WE do the invading since then.

What is raising taxes on the wealthiest people by 4 or 5 % going to do? Nothing. Absolutely NOTHING.

Not only that...but ALL of those wealthiest people (including Warren Hypocrite Buffet) make the majority of their money on Capital Gains. So sure...go ahead and raise the income tax rate. They still won't pay one thin dime more.

The whole premise is stupid and is designed for the Obama campaign to get a populist vote from people who just can't stand that somebody else has it better than them. It's class warfare plain and simple.

Cut the spending. How can anybody in this thread possibly justify 10.6 BILLION dollars a day in spending??? You can't. And none of you ever address it. You just stay on the Democrat talking points. And those against taxes stay on the Republican talking points. It's all deception.

The Feds are spending more money than I can even wrap my head around.

Isn't Romney supposed to be "filthy" rich? What's he worth..a couple hundred million dollars?
Well the Federal govt. is spending 6.85 million dollars PER MINUTE. Wrap your heads around that.

So in 29 minutes the federal govt. spends the same amount of Romney's entire wealth.

And Romney is the "filthy" rich one who didn't really "earn" his money? lol

NO! It's not rich people who are the problem. The feds are the filthiest and the richest.

When I was a little kid in the 60's and a teen in the 70's, my generation was taught to NEVER trust govt.
But it seems that the next generation just LOVES them some government. Sad. :(

I'd like some freedom
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/.

Great Post!
They have us fighting over a few dollars and percents, when none of that Matters.
What do you thin the Gov is going to do with the extra money it gets from raising the rates on the Rich??? I will tell you ......SPEND IT.

12clicks 09-27-2012 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19214766)
LOL, great comments.

What Minte doesn't understand is that he didn't build his business. His business was built on the work of his employees.

I stopped reading after this.

you're clueless.

there are billions of your kind on earth. very few mintes. With out the mintes of the world, you'd be busy picking thru your own shit for your next meal.

12clicks 09-27-2012 12:46 PM

and with that, my visit to trollville is over.

its an ugly reminder to continue to do well.

Tom_PM 09-27-2012 12:48 PM

Thanks for putting the troll in trollville. Come again.

Rochard 09-27-2012 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19214657)
WHAT???

A new Ferrari "California" model is $239,000.00 at the dealership here in Vegas.
http://www.penskewynnferrari.com/det...d-9040622.html

I was paying $1200 a month payments when I bought my 2007 corvette. It was around $70,000

So if I multiply those payments by 3 that would be a $3600 car payment per month. And THEN you have to get full coverage insurance. OUCH!

No...you could not earn $250,000 a year and buy a Ferrari and no do serious damage to your lifestyle.

Unless you lived in a rented singlewide trailer and didn't have any kids or a wife or pretty much any other expenses.

Wow. Some of you guys just have never made any money or even realize what it's like to live in the real world.

I agree with you.

A $240k car with a sixth month loan is $4k a month BEFORE interest. This doesn't include insurance or maintenance, both of which are insane.

papill0n 09-27-2012 12:50 PM

minte - a rich delusional fucktard so out of touch with reality his biggest drama his is 600 page mercedes manual - seriously - what a fuckin tool :1orglaugh

BlackCrayon 09-27-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 19214779)
its class warfare to ask your betters to pay something that 47% of you don't pay.

using the term betters is class warfare, troll.

what going is making poor people pay taxes they can't afford going to do anyways? its just going to make them even poorer. the ultra rich already view poor people as cannon fodder or peasants so why should poor people view the ultra rich in any good terms at all or want to do anything that benefits them? in the end they're still wage slaves. just because someone isn't smart enough or whatever life situations prevent them from being successful, be it self inflicted or other doesn't make them any less of a human being. in the end the rich need a good segment of population to be poor. society just wouldn't work as they need it to otherwise.

BlackCrayon 09-27-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 19214789)
I stopped reading after this.

you're clueless.

there are billions of your kind on earth. very few mintes. With out the mintes of the world, you'd be busy picking thru your own shit for your next meal.

eventually co-oped business and factories could eliminate the need for people like minte.

gleem 09-27-2012 12:53 PM

Pubes or Dummycrats, their only goal is to enrich themselves, their families, and make sure they burrow so deep into the tax payer they remain in office as long as possible and make govt' bigger so they get more of everything.

Till you children come to that understanding you are just being played for idiots.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123