Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19612044)

Does it really matter if a gun is automatic or not?

The 2nd amendment says that we are a free people and can own any gun we want. The govt. is nervous about that (as it should be with all the shit it pulls) and wants to make sure that we can't have them.

So Congress should repeal the 2nd amendment. Everything else is going to be justifiably ruled unconstitutional or such a small gesture that it won't really do anything except make anti-gun people feel good about themselves.

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19612060)

You have stated multiple times that Congress should repeal the 2nd amendment knowing that is not a possibility. Even the attempt to do so would make me and tens of millions of people an enemy of the state.

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19612081)

It's absolutely a possibility...not only that it's their duty to do IF the people of this country decide that it is what needs to be done.

That's why Congress has not only repealed amendments in the past...but added them as well. That's why they are called "amendments" to the Constitution. They amend the document.

I'm not sure that you and tens of millions of people would become "enemies of the state" at all. They already search us like criminals at airports, wiretap our phones, read our email, search our person, search our vehicles, etc., etc.

All those things were unheard of just a couple of decades ago. And people screamed bloody murder over it. But nobody did a thing. And let's face it, nobody will. Not you or tens of millions of others.

Look, there is an exact method that is laid out in the structure of our govt.
In order to have gun control they will have to repeal the 2nd amendment and replace it with another one.
They've done it before with other issues, and I'm sure they will do it again.

Anything else is infringing on our rights and freedom.

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19612094)

You do know what the requirements are don't you? Yes it has been done before but never to the original bill of rights. I think it would be a virtual impossibility to alter the original bill of rights.

I know it would make me an enemy of the state...end of story.

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19612103)

I agree that they probably don't have the balls to go after the 2nd amendment. Doesn't mean that they can't. Because they can. They just don't have the guts to.

And that's the point I'm trying to make.

This whole "gun control" b.s. has NOTHING to do with guns. It's just politicians trying to make you think they "care".

In reality the only thing they care about is power and money.

They know it's unconstitutional to try and take guns from Americans in any way. But they will keep fighting on BOTH sides to try and convince their constituents that they "care" about them.

Reality is IF they cared and really thought that guns were a problem, they would do what they are authorized to do.

But they won't.

That's all I'm trying to say. This is all a big farce to capture stupid people's attention and votes.

In the end, only the politicians win.

Originally Posted by lock (Post 19612156)

anyone wish to buy unchambered,com and push the right to carry unloaded perhaps? $250 single word domain name. Cheap. [email protected]

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19611715)

Here is one for you...

In Cincinnati, Ohio the police set up elaborate stings for out-call strippers (not escorts), throw fake bachelor parties, and any girl who touches anyone at the party, be it to take a dollar with her tits or even sit in his lap, is arrested (after the party is over of course) for prostitution (misdemeanor) and her driver is arrested for being her pimp, which is a felony. However, no real acts of prostitution have taken place and the driver is literally just security or some dude helping her get from A to B.

They usually hit them with multiple counts, for each lap she sits in, so they end up having to plea out due to so much shit they throw at them. Everyone who has fought it in court has lost. I've seen several really good girls and their drivers get ruined over some bullshit like this. One girl lost her child over it. All because some group of adults decided another adult was a hooker if she was naked at sat on a grown man's lap during a bachelor party.

Meanwhile at the parties, the police are trying to grope all over the girls and pull them onto them so the girl falls on them and they get to charge her. It is entrapment at its finest, but these days they don't call it that, they are just doing their job.

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19612640)

Repeal the 2nd ammendment?

You're more likely to find out the moon actually is made of cheese than that occuring.

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 19612640)

Repeal the 2nd ammendment?

You're more likely to find out the moon actually is made of cheese than that occuring.

Originally Posted by Best-In-BC (Post 19611649)

I Hope Your Kidding :2 cents:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19612922)

In the OP, he said " . If you can't afford the policy, then you can't afford the gun.", thus making out that somehow your ability to own a weapon to protect your home and family should be tied to your ability to afford some special added fee as a barrier, and that the government should make that barrier harder to cross, so as to deny more people that right simply based on their income.

This was the same concept that brought us the "poll tax" making it harder for poor people to afford to vote. Make things artificially more expensive so that only the lowest income brackets are denied their rights, as if being more able to afford to have a right means that you will be more responsible with it.

.

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19612769)

if everyone would just use guns that were available when the 2nd amendment was written...

http://vorderlader.sg1863-gross-bieb...steins_pis.jpg