GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Russia calls Obama a monkey with a grenade (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1119484)

Rochard 08-28-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 19775629)
Soviet war in Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

Casualties and losses
Soviet Forces: 14,453 Killed (total)
Afghan Forces: 18,000 killed[18]

Mujahideen: 75,000?90,000 killed, 75,000+ wounded (tentative )

Civilians (Afghan): 850,000?1,500,000 killed
Around 3 million Afghans wounded (mostly civilians)

population of afghanistan: 20M (1980)

And?

Russia had 14k KIA in ten years; We've been there longer and we've had 3k KIA.

just a punk 08-28-2013 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19776813)
Russia had 14k KIA in ten years; We've been there longer and we've had 3k KIA.

Because you have done nothing other than bombing and protecting your own bases. Do you know how many schools, hospitals, roads etc have been built by Soviets in Afghanistan? Ah, Einstein?

BTW, Mujaheddins were supplied by the States with Stingers which were used to take down Russian aircrafts and helicopters. Now try to imagine the US loses if Taliban was supplied with say... 9K38 Iglas?

Rochard 08-28-2013 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19776810)
no one removed the taliban.

Odd, because I could have sworn the Taliban were removed from the government. President Hamid Karzai is running the country. The Taliban has been reduced from a functioning government to a terrorist force who stages bombings.

Keep in mind also that with Afghanistan and Pakistan, some areas of their country have never been controlled by the government... There is just no government forces, offices, or support for entire regions of these countries - and no law either.

Rochard 08-28-2013 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19776825)
Because you have done nothing other than bombing and protecting your own bases.

I am guessing this is exactly what the Russians did too.

The problem is large amounts of Afghanistan aren't ruled by anyone - there is no government, no infrastructure, and no law. It doesn't really matter who is in power in the capital, because their power has never extended into the outer regions. Even when the Taliban was in power, they still didn't control the entire country - in fact, there was multiple armies facing the Taliban when they were in power.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19776825)
Do you know how many schools, hospitals, roads etc have been built by Soviets in Afghanistan?

I do not know. Oddly enough I don't know much about the Russian / Afghanistan war. I'm currently reading about the Falklands War, but my next book should be about the Russian war in Afghanistan.

_Richard_ 08-28-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19776848)
Odd, because I could have sworn the Taliban were removed from the government. President Hamid Karzai is running the country. The Taliban has been reduced from a functioning government to a terrorist force who stages bombings.

Keep in mind also that with Afghanistan and Pakistan, some areas of their country have never been controlled by the government... There is just no government forces, offices, or support for entire regions of these countries - and no law either.

argument wise, the magician actually does pull a rabbit from his hat.

just saying.

Vendzilla 08-28-2013 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19776106)
Ummm you do understand it's about nothing more than money don't you? Do you really think the industral military complex can survive with out wars and endless govt contracts?

You have any idea how many people would be out of work if the wars stopped?

That's the old way of thinking

When they gave the bay bridge contact to China, they said we couldn't do it, now the bridge is shut down because of failing welds and bolts.

Our government is fucking us over, period, this is not a dem vs gop thing, it's about profit.
We have more oil in the US than any of the country's in the middle east.

Right now we have a weak leader, he thought things would get better because he was more tolerant to the middle east than Bush, truth is he has no balls and that's why Reagan didn't bow to foreign powers and ended the cold war, Russia has no respect for Barry, and the other middle east countries have no respect for him as well.

I'm waiting to see if he declares war without congress voting on it, that's his style

just a punk 08-28-2013 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19776854)
I am guessing this is exactly what the Russians did too.

Really??? Ok, here is the same question again: do you know how many schools, hospitals, roads etc have been built by Soviets in Afghanistan? Ah, Einstein?

You're just bombing and hiding while Soviets were trying to change the whole country (infrastructure, med care, education etc). Feel the deference.

pornmasta 08-28-2013 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19776813)
And?

Russia had 14k KIA in ten years; We've been there longer and we've had 3k KIA.

1.5M deads in afghanistan, Soviet Union loses 14k men and for the offical history, they lost the war ????

Rochard 08-28-2013 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19777210)
Really??? Ok, here is the same question again: do you know how many schools, hospitals, roads etc have been built by Soviets in Afghanistan? Ah, Einstein?

You're just bombing and hiding while Soviets were trying to change the whole country (infrastructure, med care, education etc). Feel the deference.

We aren't doing that in Afghanistan? I thought we were. I've been reading about schools, power plants, roads... And a dam?

http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2...cts-To-Afghans

Rochard 08-28-2013 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 19777230)
1.5M deads in afghanistan, Soviet Union loses 14k men and for the offical history, they lost the war ????

Well, they were there for a shorter period, had nearly four times the KIA, and didn't seem to accomplish our goal. We accomplished our goal. Keep in mind our beef really wasn't with the Taliban; It was with Al Qaeda.

mikesinner 08-28-2013 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19775337)
"The West behaves towards the Islamic world like a monkey with a grenade."... Says the country that got it's ass handed to them in Afghanistan.

We killed millions and they killed thousands of us. Even the worst case stats say it was thousands to one. That's all it was ever about in the first place so we won.

AndrewX 08-28-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 19775629)
Soviet war in Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

Casualties and losses
Soviet Forces: 14,453 Killed (total)
Afghan Forces: 18,000 killed[18]

Mujahideen: 75,000?90,000 killed, 75,000+ wounded (tentative )

Civilians (Afghan): 850,000?1,500,000 killed
Around 3 million Afghans wounded (mostly civilians)

population of afghanistan: 20M (1980)

Who came up with these numbers, aren't rebels civilians? The US interfered and turned the Mujahideen into the Taliban, it created a monster for themselves, something the Russians were trying to destroy a long time ago.

NewNick 08-28-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19775337)
"The West behaves towards the Islamic world like a monkey with a grenade."... Says the country that got it's ass handed to them in Afghanistan.


It is not getting any better is it ?

I really think you need to have a lie down.

:helpme

AndrewX 08-28-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777237)
Well, they were there for a shorter period, had nearly four times the KIA, and didn't seem to accomplish our goal. We accomplished our goal. Keep in mind our beef really wasn't with the Taliban; It was with Al Qaeda.

10 years is short? I quote Wikipedia:

Large numbers of Soviet Airborne Forces joined stationed ground troops and began to land in Kabul on December 25.

On December 27, 1979, 700 Soviet troops occupied major governmental, military and media buildings in Kabul, including their primary target – the Tajbeg Presidential Palace.

On December 27, 1979, the operation began at 19:00 hr., when the KGB-led Soviet Zenith Group destroyed Kabul's communications hub, paralyzing Afghan military command.

At 19:15, the assault on Tajbeg Palace began; as planned, president Hafizullah Amin was killed. Simultaneously, other objectives were occupied (e.g. the Ministry of Interior at 19:15).

The operation was fully complete by the morning of December 28, 1979.

Then the US came to help the so called brave and helpless rebels, first by financial aid, later weapons. One of their commanders and leaders was Osama bin Laden! Should've stayed out, and maybe the twin-towers would still be there.

just a punk 08-29-2013 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777237)
Well, they were there for a shorter period, had nearly four times the KIA

Once again, Mujaheddins were supported by two powerful countries: the USA and China. What would happen to your army if Taliban was supported by Russia? Something tells me that your KIA would grow many times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777237)
and didn't seem to accomplish our goal. We accomplished our goal.

Really? What is your goal then?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777237)
Keep in mind our beef really wasn't with the Taliban; It was with Al Qaeda.

Actually Al Qaeda is Taliban. Both were created by CIA, BTW.

just a punk 08-29-2013 01:11 AM

http://planetpov.com/wp-content/uplo...an-taliban.jpg

Lykos 08-29-2013 04:49 AM

Hope there won't be new war...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123