GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fabian Sells Manwin To Management team (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1123898)

NewNick 10-25-2013 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19847177)
Not by my choice man. It seems like everytime anybody says something negative about piracy...they get crucified.

Suddenly I am the bad guy and am being attacked. Makes no sense to me.

Farrell is the asshole coming on here our of nowhere and calling me a thief and trying to disparage all the things I've ever done and proud of. I suppose he's trying to make himself feel better. Doesn't matter to me.

I said earlier how I felt about it...before he started attacking me personally and trying to justify his own bullshit.

But like y'all pointed out...it just "Robbie-ized" the thread and takes the attention off the subject matter. Which is exactly what it's supposed to do I guess.

I have no interest in your argument - but I too am constantly amazed how the tide has turned.

The apologists for piracy seem to be the most vociferous. Whenever anyone tries to do anything about piracy you get Dame wittering on about how it will never stop it so you should not try, and now its ok for Manwin et al to make millions form piracy because everyone has done something dishonest at least once in their lives. It really is such bullshit.

A) It is not ok for me to come into your house and steal everything you have because you once used a pirated piece of software. Not legally or morally.

B) Not acting against piracy because it wont cure the world of copyright infringement is not an argument. Murder was not eliminated by creating laws to punish murderers. This is a truly ridiculous argument.

C) Fabian leaves Manwin to a reported large payout. It does not mean he was a creative genius that invented technologies and processes that opened new markets and changed the way adult services are monetized. The reality is he headed up an enterprise that was already working the DMCA loop whole on an industrial scale before he took over. Under his leadership he failed in his attempt to legitimize the company, and his ego became his downfall.

Lets get things into perspective.

JFK 10-25-2013 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19847417)
Lets get things into perspective,........Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree. (Evil1, 19th April 2012)

That's why I'm quoting you on this :thumbsup

NewNick 10-25-2013 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 19847536)
That's why I'm quoting you on this :thumbsup


QFT ?


:winkwink:

JFK 10-25-2013 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19847539)
QFT ?


:winkwink:

Well, this thread got jacked a few pages ago, so my quote cant be any worse :Graucho

slapass 10-25-2013 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 19846620)
Speaking from experience, the gay companies that were comrades in the Acacia Defense Group were stand up companies run by savvy, professional, and resolute individuals, people that could be counted on when things there were at the bleakest and costliest. So my hunch is that it has less to do with faith in their abilities than it has to do with lack of communication and coordination between the hetero and gay sides of the business due mostly to... you guessed it... latent and blatant homophobia on the straight side of the equation.

People need to realize that asking help from gay companies to fight piracy doesn't automatically make anyone a butt pirate. :2 cents::winkwink:

The fact that they protect their stuff should be able to be moved to the straight side. That is the crazy part, the whole system is in place but not used.

mikesouth 10-25-2013 08:21 AM

MindGeek word of the day

Far-L 10-25-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19847119)
Whatever man.

Go ahead and attack me and my integrity. And brag about how well you are converting tube traffic built on the backs of stolen content. Good for you.

Sorry to hear that you have to resort to that to stay in business. So far I haven't had to.

As for "emails" you are getting. I could care less. I know what I have done.

And I'm calling you a liar straight up. You never "caught" me cookie stuffing because I don't.

You don't know what "cookie stuffing" is. Hell, I'm surprised you can even post on a forum.

I have had you act like a fucking jackass to me on this forum over and over and over. And I have done my best to not get crazy about it out of respect.
But you don't seem to have any. So I no longer care.

Fuck you. And I'll tell you that to your face the first chance I get. :)

Funny, because most programs I know frown on 0x0 iframes and clearly state using them is a TOS violation. You are just pissed because I called you out and let you demonstrate what a hypocrite you truly are.

Feel free to tell me to fuck off. Call me an asshole. Take a swing at me if it makes you feel better next time you see me. None of that will change the facts. I didn't come out of nowhere. I just spoke up because I didn't want you to keep throwing stones in your glass house.

Personally, I think you should be apologizing at this point but go ahead and keep getting more vindictive if it makes you feel better.


Robbie 10-25-2013 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 19847821)
Funny, because most programs I know frown on 0x0 iframes and clearly state using them is a TOS violation.

That is exactly what cookie stuffing is: a 1x1 frame.
I didn't do that. I had your tour in a 700 x 1000 frame so that surfers could see the tour and I linked to your site right above the vid and right below it and then below that with the tour.

Robbie 10-25-2013 10:01 AM

Also Far-L, I have written you a small novel in the form of a private message on here so that this stupidity will no longer thread-jack this subject.

Far-L 10-25-2013 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19847837)
That is exactly what cookie stuffing is: a 1x1 frame.
I didn't do that. I had your tour in a 700 x 1000 frame so that surfers could see the tour and I linked to your site right above the vid and right below it and then below that with the tour.

Wow, at that size you wouldn't think it would be so hard to find. :1orglaugh

The Porn Nerd 10-25-2013 11:32 AM

The funny thing to me is: people who monetize from tubes (of which I am one) can't seem to monetize any other way. Yet those who do NOT monetize via tube submissions seem to be doing fine and won't go near tubes. Why is that? Why can't we all get along heh?

Seriously tho: I would love - repeat: L-O-V-E love love love - to get traffic from SEO. Or from any other source of traffic. Perhaps I will "work" my affiliates more but many (who are left) DO promote my sites on their Blogs, free sites, TGPs etc but still the sales come mostly from tube submissions. I'd like to do BOTH but it seems to be difficult to do so. Maybe it's just me. LOL

Captain Kawaii 10-25-2013 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19848027)
The funny thing to me is: people who monetize from tubes (of which I am one) can't seem to monetize any other way. Yet those who do NOT monetize via tube submissions seem to be doing fine and won't go near tubes. Why is that? Why can't we all get along heh?

Seriously tho: I would love - repeat: L-O-V-E love love love - to get traffic from SEO. Or from any other source of traffic. Perhaps I will "work" my affiliates more but many (who are left) DO promote my sites on their Blogs, free sites, TGPs etc but still the sales come mostly from tube submissions. I'd like to do BOTH but it seems to be difficult to do so. Maybe it's just me. LOL

Once your stuff is on the tubes there is no other way. I went the other route and do everything BUT tubes. Ratios and sales improving for all lines of business each and every month. You have to personally work at it. Tube traffic is a joke to content owners. A bad joke.

I promote one Japanese program that viciously keeps stuff off the tubes and file lockers.
My ratios for all time are under 1:350 and last two months 1:202. What are your ratios on the tubes?

Maybe hire an in-house staff for working your sites. Try shooting unique content.

_Richard_ 10-25-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19847539)
QFT ?


:winkwink:

funny what people take as metaphor, and what people take as literal

adultmobile 10-25-2013 03:30 PM

I am in GFY just to read the Manwin/Fabian posts

signupdamnit 10-25-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii (Post 19848060)
Once your stuff is on the tubes there is no other way.

It's amazing how many sponsors still don't get this. Of course I doubt you are saying 100% no sales any other way but it is common sense. If you give it all away for free or most of it your other sales will suffer eventually at some point.

From observation I saw a common pattern:

1. Piracy causes sales to slip overall.
2. Affiliate sales decrease.
3. Sponsor gives in and starts a tube campaign with long videos.
4. Sponsor sees "success" and thinks "Oh boy! Free sales!"
5. Affiliate sales begin radically declining at an accelerated pace now.
6. Sponsor starts seeing diminishing returns from tube campaigns.
7. Affiliate sales are almost non-existent now
8. Sales from tube campaigns further decline, diminishing returns.
9. Sponsor goes out of business

Due 10-26-2013 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 19848412)
It's amazing how many sponsors still don't get this. Of course I doubt you are saying 100% no sales any other way but it is common sense. If you give it all away for free or most of it your other sales will suffer eventually at some point.

From observation I saw a common pattern:

1. Piracy causes sales to slip overall.
2. Affiliate sales decrease.
3. Sponsor gives in and starts a tube campaign with long videos.
4. Sponsor sees "success" and thinks "Oh boy! Free sales!"
5. Affiliate sales begin radically declining at an accelerated pace now.
6. Sponsor starts seeing diminishing returns from tube campaigns.
7. Affiliate sales are almost non-existent now
8. Sales from tube campaigns further decline, diminishing returns.
9. Sponsor goes out of business

I think part of that reason is that there have been a lot of sponsors who produced template pay sites as if they where a factory.
It became easier to produce a new pay site every 2 weeks with 100 hosted galleries / 50 promo videos than actually building and maintaining a couple of websites.
One of the reasons was that many affiliates switched to automated promotion tools, auto import galleries and videos. all build on templates etc. so it obviously would but convert.

it's not the free content that is the main thing hurting sales, it's when you start promoting sites being blindfolded.

Captain Kawaii 10-26-2013 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 19848412)
It's amazing how many sponsors still don't get this. Of course I doubt you are saying 100% no sales any other way but it is common sense. If you give it all away for free or most of it your other sales will suffer eventually at some point.

From observation I saw a common pattern:

1. Piracy causes sales to slip overall.
2. Affiliate sales decrease.
3. Sponsor gives in and starts a tube campaign with long videos.
4. Sponsor sees "success" and thinks "Oh boy! Free sales!"
5. Affiliate sales begin radically declining at an accelerated pace now.
6. Sponsor starts seeing diminishing returns from tube campaigns.
7. Affiliate sales are almost non-existent now
8. Sales from tube campaigns further decline, diminishing returns.
9. Sponsor goes out of business

You are correct about that. Not 100% but programs with tube deals end up kicking affiliates in the nuts. I said that first when pimproll rolled out their tubes. Now you have affiliates in 10-2013 asking for sponsor listings who do not work with tubes. Evidence is pretty much there. Your 1-9 sums it up well.

Captain Kawaii 10-26-2013 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due (Post 19849151)
I think part of that reason is that there have been a lot of sponsors who produced template pay sites as if they where a factory.
It became easier to produce a new pay site every 2 weeks with 100 hosted galleries / 50 promo videos than actually building and maintaining a couple of websites.
One of the reasons was that many affiliates switched to automated promotion tools, auto import galleries and videos. all build on templates etc. so it obviously would but convert.

it's not the free content that is the main thing hurting sales, it's when you start promoting sites being blindfolded.

Naw, I met an old guy at a Japanese market the other day. He said he used to pay then he discovered xhamster. He said "no need to pay any more right?"

Times that a few hundred million and you have today's sales.

Far-L 10-26-2013 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19848027)
The funny thing to me is: people who monetize from tubes (of which I am one) can't seem to monetize any other way. Yet those who do NOT monetize via tube submissions seem to be doing fine and won't go near tubes. Why is that? Why can't we all get along heh?

Seriously tho: I would love - repeat: L-O-V-E love love love - to get traffic from SEO. Or from any other source of traffic. Perhaps I will "work" my affiliates more but many (who are left) DO promote my sites on their Blogs, free sites, TGPs etc but still the sales come mostly from tube submissions. I'd like to do BOTH but it seems to be difficult to do so. Maybe it's just me. LOL

I have not really seen that being the case. From my point of view, if you can convert tube traffic you can convert anything. Also, at least from our experience, it is important to have a balance of organic, SEO, and affiliate marketing. You never want all your eggs in one basket... as we have had to learn the hard way more times than I care to admit to:2 cents:

Magnetron 10-27-2013 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19848027)
The funny thing to me is: people who monetize from tubes (of which I am one) can't seem to monetize any other way. Yet those who do NOT monetize via tube submissions seem to be doing fine and won't go near tubes. Why is that? Why can't we all get along heh?

Seriously tho: I would love - repeat: L-O-V-E love love love - to get traffic from SEO. Or from any other source of traffic. Perhaps I will "work" my affiliates more but many (who are left) DO promote my sites on their Blogs, free sites, TGPs etc but still the sales come mostly from tube submissions. I'd like to do BOTH but it seems to be difficult to do so. Maybe it's just me. LOL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii (Post 19848060)
Once your stuff is on the tubes there is no other way. I went the other route and do everything BUT tubes. Ratios and sales improving for all lines of business each and every month. You have to personally work at it. Tube traffic is a joke to content owners. A bad joke.

I promote one Japanese program that viciously keeps stuff off the tubes and file lockers.
My ratios for all time are under 1:350 and last two months 1:202. What are your ratios on the tubes?

Maybe hire an in-house staff for working your sites. Try shooting unique content.

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 19848412)
It's amazing how many sponsors still don't get this. Of course I doubt you are saying 100% no sales any other way but it is common sense. If you give it all away for free or most of it your other sales will suffer eventually at some point.

From observation I saw a common pattern:

1. Piracy causes sales to slip overall.
2. Affiliate sales decrease.
3. Sponsor gives in and starts a tube campaign with long videos.
4. Sponsor sees "success" and thinks "Oh boy! Free sales!"
5. Affiliate sales begin radically declining at an accelerated pace now.
6. Sponsor starts seeing diminishing returns from tube campaigns.
7. Affiliate sales are almost non-existent now
8. Sales from tube campaigns further decline, diminishing returns.
9. Sponsor goes out of business

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii (Post 19849332)
You are correct about that. Not 100% but programs with tube deals end up kicking affiliates in the nuts. I said that first when pimproll rolled out their tubes. Now you have affiliates in 10-2013 asking for sponsor listings who do not work with tubes. Evidence is pretty much there. Your 1-9 sums it up well.

Hmmm ..... ummm ..... yeah ..... http://m2.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/1119567-spam-sponsors-channels-user-uploaded-tubes.html

adultmobile 10-28-2013 05:24 AM

Since no one cared to this Fabian thread lately, Mike went to complain on the filelocker threads:

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1124551

signupdamnit 10-28-2013 05:48 AM

So is it really true that Manwin is in trouble and downsizing? If true this should be a wake up call to some in our industry who say the tube model is the best thing to happen to us. IF the largest adult company and the clear leader in tube sites is having trouble then that is not good for those who think the tube sites are net positive for us as an industry.

mikesouth 10-28-2013 09:08 AM

Check out www.manwin.com

but hey what do I know......called that one though.....

DWB 10-28-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19850725)
Check out www.manwin.com

but hey what do I know......called that one though.....

You nailed that one.

Ditch the controversial owner or front man, change the name, distance yourself a little from the bad name Manwin has, and carry on. Rinse, repeat. The Mansef shuffle.

mikesouth 10-28-2013 09:32 AM

as of Oct 31 they lose their sirus sat radio channel too....another manwin success story.

Shap 11-01-2013 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19842315)
Shap still looks happy about the deal :winkwink:

LOL Awesome photo

slapass 05-19-2014 05:37 AM

I wonder how this is working out?

javbucks 05-19-2014 07:39 AM

He looks like a goober wow

xXXtesy10 05-19-2014 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 20091575)
I wonder how this is working out?


AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 05-19-2014 07:59 AM

Meet the new boss (Feras Antoon), same as the old boss:

http://storage.journaldequebec.com/v...y=80&size=650x

They changed their name from Mansef to Manwin to MindGeek, but the song remains the same, let's just hope that we don't get fooled again! :2 cents:

:stoned

ADG

Kelli58 05-19-2014 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 20091725)
They changed their name from Mansef to Manwin to MindGeek, but the song remains the same, let's just hope that we don't get fooled again! :2 cents:

Sadly we seem to have a very short memory in our industry. I mean look at what Mr. Marcus did and people are always starting to consider working with him again.

JA$ON 05-19-2014 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 20091725)
Meet the new boss (Feras Antoon), same as the old boss:

http://storage.journaldequebec.com/v...y=80&size=650x

They changed their name from Mansef to Manwin to MindGeek, but the song remains the same, let's just hope that we don't get fooled again! :2 cents:

:stoned

ADG

Ya, he's ben there since day 1. Honestly.....he is one of the smarter and absolutely one of the nicer and more honest people I know in this business. Thats just from my dealings with him, both business and personal.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123