![]() |
A 'merger' with RedTube produces the 100M they needed to buy out Fabian - no way, that's fuzzy math right there.
|
Quote:
But in reality they won't do a damn thing. Because the reality is that people will watch this episode and then they will want to see the original and since it is still active they will eventually become weekly viewers once they catch up. So take it down and lose all of that potential revenue. Keep it up and you have a gold mine. Same thing as Mr SKin. |
Quote:
|
Manwin and their assets helped many of us growing a business and making great ROI. I love their sites, staff and products. You can't ignore them in this business even if you want to, but why would you. Too many more years of business to come. Change of staff, ownership of any of that doesnt change the business.
|
Quote:
Like I said previously in this thread, any real negativity about manwin/tubes has gone from me, but come on, let's not try and kid anyone, least of all ourselves, that tubes have made you [as in anyone, not you specifically Mike] more money than you otherwise would have made :upsidedow Assuming you sell paysite memberships, that is. |
bummer
8 char |
Quote:
If you want I'll bet you $100 that if you take an unaltered 65 second clip from any aired Walking Dead episode and post it on Youtube with a title which includes "Walking Dead" in it, it will be taken down/fingerprinted within 72 hours. They do NOT fuck around. I wouldn't be surprised to see it nuked within 24 hours. |
250 ex-Porno König's...
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4861873920/h9AD2F562/ Quote:
:stoned ADG |
Quote:
And thank god that Europe is such a big "house" to be arrested in, much more pleasant than the whole ankle bracelet deal in the US of A. :winkwink: Thanks for the entertainment I guess. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Secondly...we weren't stealing any content. When it first started we linked to stuff we shouldn't have because we didn't know any better. But we got set straight real fast. Thirdly...we made millions of dollars with the people who owned content (paysites). We didn't devalue their content in any way. We worked with them and it was mutually advantageous (i.e. the golden years of the adult industry online) Fourth (and last)...I owned and shot every bit of content for the content company we owned. One of the many companies we ran in adult: Pure Candy Images. Started shooting for that in 1997 and opened the doors to it in 1998. Sold it in 2002. So there goes your theory that I was some kind of thief who only saw the light when I opened Claudia-Marie.Com (in 2007) I was never a thief. Never devalued anyone's content. And never used anything without permission. Hell, we bought disc after disc of non-exlclusive content to make galleries. Then around 2002, I stopped taking any submissions and went 100% hosted galleries. Sorry pal...but your feeble attempt to make ME the bad guy doesn't fly. But I'll remember that you did try it, so if I happen to run into you at a show I can tell you to kiss my ass in person. |
Quote:
|
. . . . . :) lot more cash on the other side. :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Bump for thread no one seems to care at.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
what if everyone would focus on growing their own business instead of worrying what Fabian is doing?
And don't give me the usual Fabian is preventing my business to grow bullshit, ranting here doesn't solve shit, adopt or die :2 cents: |
|
Quote:
|
i'm not adopting anything...
|
Quote:
Well, there goes my dream of calling you "Dad" :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Tubes are out there, you cant ignore them, you can hate them but you cant ignore them if you want to run a solid business nowadays. |
You seem pretty happy with the way things are Mike Dutch. What do you do these days?
Did you "innovate" like Manwin (stolen content)? Or some other innovation? |
Quote:
When I ran askjolene.com we opened up an Tube, always containing the movies of sponsors and linking to them. It was a hard business model and lost over the big tubes that provided full movies. We mostly push sponsors now with our CPA networks containing a solid set of affiliates. |
Quote:
Its no excuse to say "we do it because everyone else is doing it." If people had spines in this business Fabian would have remained a failure. |
Quote:
Care to explain that statement? |
Quote:
Systems for automating uploading and re-posting DMCA'd content are openly touted,admired and purchased. Fabian and his ilk depend on being able to skirt applicable laws. Nothing controversial here. It's biz as usual. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And so my point is valid. Those so-called "Golden Years" were rich due to just as much edgy and ethically questionable biz practices. |
Quote:
Both aren't right, but there is a big difference in the 2 right? |
Quote:
Stealing is stealing. I don't care if it is one penny. However, neither Robbie or Fabian would say that what is or was going on would or could be called stealing. Both would say he policed the situation given the tools to do so. Both would say he operated within the lines of what was acceptable and competitively necessary in the market. Neither would be wrong. |
Quote:
|
so what's next ?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The consequences would be quite different if you stole a single penny from me vs if you stole 100k. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123