ditch the smoking though. total turn off.

What else has been posted?

A model has used photographs of herself, given to her by the photographer, to find work.


Trying to be disgusted without reason just means you are stupid.

Hot girls :thumbsup

They ain't english at all :)

But good looking!

Brunette babe looks sooooo sexy... :) Blonde also has her qualities but, I'm for brunette this time.. :) Great pics... :thumbsup

Ann has told me they still have a couple od days free....


Contact

playfulanne AT gmail.com

Harsh stuff.

I think the blond will look a lot better in a better outfit and make up. She is a lot prettier in real life.

Two days to go.

Just to add;

I spoke to Anne, the first model, and she said....

The photos were given to her on her request for the purpose of finding more work.

That they did NOT have any watermarks on them.

A. The models should use the pictures to promote themselves and look for work.
B. They should not crop out the watermark under any circumstances unless they own them.
C. Models should hire good photographers to shoot their portfolios if they want to do anything at all with the images.
D. I don't think it fair to blame cherry 7 for posting what the girls give her. She is not the photo police. How is she supposed to know if an image is cropped? Also she is helping the girls find work and helping us see new girls.

Its pretty simple really. :2 cents:

She is a he. No one was blaming him for posting what the girls gave him, they were incredulous that after the person that owns the pics posted here, he didn't then explain to the girls not to fucking crop the watermarks off and delete the pics.

Hope that helps bring you up to speed.

I don't have time to read every snide remark in a thread like you do (even though I read yours) and I don't need to be brought up to speed thanks :1orglaugh

That being said everything my 4 points are correct. And if Cherry is a he so what? :error


I absolutely agree that girls need to be educated to not crop watermarks. And I don't understand why photographers post other photographers pictures (have I ever done that?) be we are in a pool of amateurs and pros here so it is bound to happen.

nice babes

THEY DID NOT CROP OR REMOVE ANY WATERMARKS,

Why would they, I or they had no interest in denying the ownership of the pictures.

The owner of the pictures had given the model (pictures made with her ) permission to use the pictures. Not to show her family but to seek work.

This pictures were not used to create traffic or for any other purpose other than finding work for the models.

The first girl is really cute, but second one looks like a whore and drunkard too.

Odd that the owner of the pictures posted how annoyed he is the watermarks were cropped off then, isn't it?

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=20108807&postcount=23

He didn't do it, you didn't do it, the girls didn't do it...

I guess the Weird Photo Cropper Monster did it.

Did what? You think the photos were cropped?

Do the photos looked cropped? I don't know how to remove watermarks and could not be bothered, neither does the model.

Or the photographs were never watermarked in the first place.

And as the photographer ( who knows her) who was "very annoyed" has not bothered to contact the model by email or phone to ask her, or her agent.

Far easier to create a little storm on GFY where no evidence is required just the cry of the mob.