![]() |
Quote:
But, tell ya what I'll do, since so many gfyers are concerned about what dyna mo thinks about psychology, I'll chalk this up to semantics. While psychology is not scientific, it is A science. Like political science or sociology, it's studied in a serious and rigorous manner. Speaking of, I recently read that the "science" behind antidepressants is backwards. Quote:
The science behind many antidepressants appears to be backwards, researchers say psych science! :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Of course psychology, philosophy, anthropology, history, etc is science... Well... of course when it's practiced within scientific framework, but that also counts for physics and maths.
Science is divided in different disciplines: alfa-, beta- and gamma-science. History and filosophy for example are placed under Studia Humanitatis/Humanities (alfa) The fact that a study is not exact; beta... like maths and physics doesn't mean it isn't science. It's no coincidence these different forms of science are divided into alfa, beta and gamma. Sometimes there is also overlap. Biology for example has exact as well as non-exact fields of study... it doesn't make it less science. The difference between these fields of science for example is methodology. While physics strongly depends on math for coming to conclusions, history and philosophy use hypothesis and deduction (The process of reasoning in which a conclusion follows necessarily from the stated premises; inference by reasoning from the general to the specific). I studied history and filosophy myself at the University of Amsterdam. You will not only learn to study these fields of interest, but also how to practice correct methodology, etc to come to valid conclusions. There are also subjects that everyone who studies at a University must study. Whether you study History or Physics, everyone has to study subjects like Philosophy of Science,etc So... when it comes to this: a.53% think psychology is science b.34% of all Europeans think history is science a. 47% is clueless b. 66% is clueless |
Again, since so many gfyers are concerned about what Dyna mo thinks of science-
I'll agree psych is A science, just like studying politics is A science, but just like political science, it is not scientific. |
Quote:
science would call you a black hole. :) |
Quote:
thread's not about what people think of dyna mo's view on psychology, which is all pretty silly actually to watch people like you get torqued up about my view of psycho, as if it's essential to you, others and especially me that I conform to your fucking view on something. And you think you speak for science? that science would call me a black hole? Then you fail to realize how science works- getting shit wrong and keeping trying to find the right answer. So knock it off with your elitist bullshit. The truly bizarre part about your post and others is I never tried to convince anyone that their view needs to align with mine. I've simply replied to the attack on my view with support for it. It's too bad you can't see the thread for what it is- pointing out that we're all, internationally, about the same level of intelligence. 25% of the people on the planet think the Sun revolves around the Earth. Doesn't matter where they live. It's not excusively USA, as the other thread tries to imply. but you're only interested in a drive-by insult. I'm sure you feel better about yourself now. |
Quote:
sure thing. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
|
Quote:
Learn: " most scientific studies are ultimately wrong is normal for science. There are more theories in the graveyard of science than theories that stand the test of time. Why? Because new data is always emerging and theories have to be adjusted. Theories are only as good as theories are, until new data comes along and ruins them. Theories give a best guess at what is going on based on things we observe (data), but they are not immutable. If you only have a few data points, then your working theory is more likely to turn out to be wrong. This is not news to science, this is science. Ioannidis goes on to say: Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, with ensuing confusion and disappointment." Not breaking news: many scientific studies are ultimately proved wrong! | Science | The Guardian |
If I recall correctly, psychology is considered a "soft science" since it doesn't adhere to rigorous standards that other scientific disciplines like chemistry and biology do. The latter are "hard sciences".
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123