So you think the Bush family did this?

The Bush family is an oil family. And Afghanistan doesn't have any oil.

You've oversimplifying, the Bush family are on the same team as the people who did this, the Bush family would have mostly been following orders.

To understand fully the purpose of the false flag and so-called War on Terror, read this report from PNAC

http://www.informationclearinghouse....asDefenses.pdf

Wish them dead ?

What are you wittering about now crazy boi ?

Life doesn't stop and start at your convenience NewNick, you have to read the thread fully to make sense of it, in the same way as you need to research 9/11 properly rather than religiously trusting the mainstream narrative

The bush family are of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

The Windsor-Bush Bloodline

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramesses_II

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...sesIIEgypt.jpg

Fucking simpleton

So now you are telling me the Bush family - which is rich on it's own and runs the most powerful country in the world - takes orders from someone else?

LOL.

Yep, the top ones like to stay out of view

So what you are saying is.... The entire Bush family is a front who works for someone else. But no one knows who they work for. Or what their motives are. And no one knows why this "group" that controls the most powerful country in the world would want to stage a terrorist attack?

Sure sure.

What was wrong with the chain of command on 9/11?

They all found reason to do something else on 9/11? Wasn't Cheney at the White House in the situation room, and wasn't Rumsfeld at the Pentagon? (I checked - Cheney was in fact at the White House, and Rumsfeld was in fact at the Pentagon.

Who was in charge? The President of the United States of course. He was on Air Force one and then on a military base, before returning to the White House that night. President Bush was completely in control on 9/11, and if not, the VP was in the White House. There is no issues with the chain of command at all on 9/11.

I thought he told me earlier that this plan was born years before 2001, so Clinton was actually the culprit. Or was it Poppy Bush who started the plot after the end of Desert Storm? You should ask Wehateporn these details. He'll probably make something up for you in 2 seconds.

There is no way that that many people can hold that big of a secret.

We should have an investigation.

How many people would it have taken to wire up both buildings? And no one saw anything? And everyone kept their mouth shut? Sure sure.

It's pathetic that such a horrible event which has been aired live by most of the world's TVs can be the subject of insane interpretations by brainless idiots who try to exist by propagating theories than they know are fakes.

It is all explained in the report they wrote, which I linked you to, Rebuilding Americas Defenses by PNAC

Architects and engineers are among the smarter people in society, it is mostly the logical people who debunk the official story

10 Solid Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Be Debunked

10 Solid Facts About 9/11 That Cannot Be Debunked | Conspiracyclub

interesting poll: Voters 55 so far.

YES 27 49.09%
NO 22 40.00%
I DONT KNOW 6 10.91%

how did this thread go from 1000 views to 9000 views in a few hours?

the US gov is conspiring against this thread :2 cents:

I hope a democracy drone isnt about to drop off some democracy and some freedom fries

It's now being admitted in Egypt

Egyptian state media claims Isis is 'made up' and 9/11 was carried out by West to justify war on terror | The Independent

Planes do not fly forward, fires do not damage, buildings do not fall downward, Al Qaida is not bad people. So yes, it must have been an insider job. No doubt.

:thumbsup

:error .

This poll is from 4 years ago, seems GFY opinion has changed a lot since then

"Ms Al-Sharnoubi said the World Trade Centre and Pentagon attacks could have been premeditated to "justify the war on terror? in her column, published on 23 August."


One journalist said 9/11 "could have been premeditated" so how do you get they admitted it?

yeah, you just quoted a kook page and added an egyptian culprit to this story and HE'S the simpleton... well played whack job.

I don't think it's crazy to think the government is hiding shit, even about this, but when you loons start trying to piece things together it becomes an embarrassment of epic proportions every single time.

as the investigation progresses ? inside or not?)

Yet we still have no smoking gun and not one person has come forward to admit they took part in this. Please don't tell me they've all been killed - if so, who did the killing? If they had the ability to kill dozens of people involved, why didn't they just wire up the buildings themselves?

You do not need to hold it a secret you claim it's conspiracy theory bullshit and come up with fake excuses why it is not so...people will get bored and move on...

So far no one has even come up with a reason anyone would want 9/11 to happen. It's not like the United States wanted to invade a land locked country that had no oil.

US government needed a way to push forward the patriot act. If 911 doesn't happen no patriot act.

The PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001.[1] With its ten-letter abbreviation (USA PATRIOT) expanded, the full title is "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001".[2]

Opponents of the law have criticized its authorization of indefinite detentions of immigrants; the permission given law enforcement officers to search a home or business without the owner's or the occupant's consent or knowledge; the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional.

Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, just the opposite. Before 9/11 the general public didn't know what the NSA was. Before 9/11 the could do whatever they wanted and were clueless and blind.

Ah a positive result of the attack then. I guess knowing that makes it ok now.

this sums it up

Then you have not been paying attention to the replies, PNAC Rebuilding Americas Defenses

need more votes. 60 is not enough :thumbsup

Think about this ---finding a crew of hundreds of demolition experts who are also remorseless monsters able to keep their dark secret --- would be a more incredible feat than actually wiring the buildings to blow, which as I've stated earlier is also impossible.

disappointing 60 votes

Another amazing coincidence related to the WTC | 911Blogger.com

Holy shit! That proves you're not crazy!

It's funny how you idiots are so confident you're right, that you put the burden of proof on everyone else -- basically to prove that reality is reality.

When you produce some kind of "evidence" it's always some idiot blog from the darkest reaches of the internet. You're such a fucking moron to think posting that website means anything.

It means less than nothing.

Not unlike your own existence.

You think the royalty of new doesn't descend from the royalty of old? lol. kook page? whack job?? lol and lol. Go guzzle some more creatine.

I know that your mind is closed to these types of possibilities, I have sympathy, the reality is not nice, but at some point you'll need to come to terms with this, whether it's now or at a later date :2 cents:

no it is not