Firstly "News" outlets have always endorsed a candidate / party / ideology.

In the UK the Murdoch press (Sun, Times, News of the World) dictated the election results for 30 years. The first thing Tony Blair did when he became leader of a dysfunctional Labour party was to court Rupert Murdoch. He new that Murdoch made Prime Ministers and without the Murdoch press he would never win a general election.

Secondly it is interesting that you call Hillary's transgressions facts, yet Mr Trumps merely speculations or wild allegations. I think you need a reality check Sir. The Trump transgressions come entirely from his own mouth.

:2 cents:

200 out of 9000 walked out. Yep, Trump is winning in Florida :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I get a real kick out of reading these threads. "The intelligent" can not understand how anyone can favor trump. I would love to hear "the intelligent" give me reasons to vote for Clinton. I think she has had a chance to lead, in the senate, in the cabinet and her only success is raising money. Her failures are numerous. Her judgement is highly suspect. Her motives should be questioned. How can you attack trump so viciously and give Clinton a pass on all her fuck-ups.

Yep - that's what I'm talking about, "journalism" is basically dead.

You call it yourself - one is a case of well documented corruption - misuse of her life long position in government in order to benefit herself and her cronies, acting against the public interest including endangering the national security.

The second is pretty much mostly what someone says, be it DJT himself or whoever else. Mostly a gossip material that would otherwise never hit the first page if it wasn't in someone's interest to do so.

Says / not does or did - note the difference.

Ok vote for the guy that calls Mexicans rapists, never pays tax because he is smart, rapes his wife, a guy who thinks Mr Putin should be admired, and of course "grabs em by the pussy".

Some people have weak minds. They see mainstream media as an authority, and their brain soaks up everything without questioning anything. When they say this man is bad, the man is bad. When they say this woman is good, the woman is good. When they say that country is bad, the country is bad.

Due to this complete lack of healthy skepticism and their scary naivety into believing anything complete biased sources are saying, these sources have a monopoly on the minds of these poor saps and can make them believe anything: Brainwashing.

http://gif-finder.com/wp-content/upl...ukovychegg.gif
Same pattern as Yanukovitch was doing in Ukraine.

I couldn't have asked for a more perfect live example of my previous post than this. Thanks :)

I get it - the media made it all up.

You don't get it.

He has a lot more than that. Read his policies about stopping globalization.

Again I believe this is the only reason Trump is running for President. If the Republicans threw up someone sane and electable as a candidate would anyone vote for Hillary? But put up a whackadoodle like Trump and suddenly Hillary looks like the best choice.

Simple really.

Stopping globalisation ???

Its a shame you dont understand the world Paul.

No one is going to role back automation. Let me let you into a secret - machines and computers now do the work - the working man is very last millennia.

The industrial output of the USA has quadrupled since the 60s, but it employs a third of the people.

You really are the most frightful hypocrite. Tell me where you live again ? And why ?

The global movement of goods and services means that the market dictates where goods are produced.

So you get to live where the girls are cheap and plentiful, and your earnings go a long way. It also means that even the poorest citizens of the USA have cheap food, cars, consumer goods etc.

FFS stopping globalisation. That really is the most backward and idiotic idea. Trump is the arch capitalist - the idea of him restricting US companies from making profits really is quite laughable. So US companies are going to see their costs rocket, investors in US companies are going to see their portfolios destroyed, US consumers are going to pay more for food, consumer goods, clothes, cars, actually just about everything.

Tell me Paul do you think Mr Trump will be a popular president when he sets about "stopping globalisation" ?

Dont you see the parallels Paul ? Populist leader with a bag of bogeymen to blame. The Chinese take the jobs, the Mexicans do the raping, the media rig the election, the Washington elite are corrupt etc. He pulls the levers and you leap up and down in a frenzy of righteous indignation from your cosy home in Eastern Europe. Its fucking pathetic.

I think that even if the Republicans had ran someone different they would've ended up with virtually the same result. There still would've been a largely one-sided attack against their candidate from the largest of media outlets. When so many Americans form their opinions based on what they see on television and radio and those media outlets are completely infested with partisan wonks, it would be hard to imagine the end result would be any different.

I knew he'd win Florida.. the presidency comes as a surprise though.

If Democrats ever want to be in power again, I would suggest you understand this post. It was your virulent and hateful attacks that lost this for yourselves.