Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335452)

No.

I'm just not a self entitled retard who grew up with safe spaces and participation trophies who can't understand why he isn't suddenly getting what he wants no matter how hard he kicks and screams and who doesn't seem to understand that our way of electing a President is established in the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.

No amount of crying and whining and finger pointing and denial and self deception/delusion will change that simple fact. Understanding the process and our system of government and accepting the outcomes hardly makes one "unpatriotic". One could however, argue that denying the results of the election process simply because you don't agree with them or like them, does.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335461)

That's a broad brush you paint me with. You think I'm all those things because I voted Democrat this cycle?

I just ask you questions and you hit me back with name calling & stereotypes. Where is your mind? So much propaganda and name calling from you. So little substance when it comes to politics. Other then that I still like you :thumbsup

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335497)

. but the election however is over. It's done.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335524)

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335266)

Uhm... no.

Trump responded time and time again to that career criminal cunts (you know, the bitch that vandalized and robbed both the White House and State Department on her way out) repeated question of "will you accept the outcome of the election" because you delusional weirdos assumed the victory in spite of never having been right about absolutely anything at all with respect to his running, being nominated and then winning the election.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335356)

^^ triggered ^^

I said let's be honest and you reply with 100% right wing propaganda. Nowhere to go from there.

Trump lost the vote by millions. Trump has no mandate by the will of the people going into office being annointed by 538 elites on Dec. 19th. This action is against the will of the majority of Americans.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21334231)

I hate Trump with a passion, but I also believe in being both realistic and honest.

If you are repeating nonsense from heavily biased websites, all you really doing is spreading fake news. I want to believe this as much as the next person, but the media isn't going to sit on this until Monday for "maximum impact". The media doesn't want to sit on news but instead each outlet wants to be the first to report it.

We'll see next week if there is any truth to this.

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 21336385)

It will be interesting to see if the way they are pursuing the recount in Pennsylvania works. They can't do it themselves, so they are pushing for 3 voters in each of the 9,500+ precincts to file a recount request. The last deadline for that is Tuesday.

Michigan uses paper ballots. I'm not sure how those could be "hacked" from Russia or wherever they're claiming did it. Luckily they can be more easily counted.

Wisconsin has only agreed, despite what is being reported, to a recount, not a full hand recount. Their machines are not connected to the internet, so hacking would have to have been accomplished in person on each machine. Each clerk decides whether to certify votes or recount them by hand. Only a court order could change that.

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21336196)

The post-truth fake news world

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21336817)

nice job showing your a mind numbed drone of the liberal corporate media. This terminology didnt exist even 1 month ago. but the news media conjures up this myth of "fake news" & now every dumb liberal robot is singing the song. you're so dumb your not even aware its bullshit.

Maybe think for yourself someday instead of barfing up cliche liberal talking points.

:1orglaugh

wanna talk fake news? how about black lives matter is a peaceful legitimate social justice group? how about hilary being a 99% chance to win the election?

hows that for fake.

:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21337759)

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21337795)

Jesus we have the same shit in post Brexit UK.

A gang of politicians who seem to think that all we need to do is regurgitate the good ol'days and everything will be fixed.

The fucking gold standard FFS.

So will you then ban currency trading ?

Or will you just ban speculation on the price of USD ?

If so you can forget about the USD being the currency of world trade. Might as well hand that over to the Chinese now.

I sincerely hope this is a fake news story !

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21337849)

Yes because tying your currency to something physical rather than a government's abstract ability to enforce is bad

http://i.imgur.com/HNlQPwE.jpg

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21338104)

Nice chart from your Hitler Youth Camp.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothsc...apoleonic_Wars

Rothschild Family is worth Billions -- so fucking what?

Their pocket change could buy and sell 1000 "Google Experts" on a bad day -- get a fucking life ...

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21338200)

Haha bye for good
fuck you

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335347)

More experienced? Obama was a 2 year absentee Senator who never voted and he did two Presidential terms. Were you arguing about his "lack of experience"?

Didn't think so.

....

Less corrupt?

Thats hardly "honest"

Almost no Democrats trust her. Thats hardly the signature of someone who is the beacon of honestly.

Educate yourself and take your blinders off. She is quite literally a career criminal. At least Bill was likable. She's not even likable.

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Primer on Bill and Hillary Clinton Scandals - The Atlantic

25 and counting: Hillary?s huge scandal list explodes

What went wrong with the election is obvious. People are getting increasingly pissed at Washington elitism, corruption and a government that doesn't represent them. They are pissed that the economy is having the slowest recovery since world war 2 while being told everything is perfect. They are pissed their health care was taken away and that made vastly more expensive with their options being limited. They are pissed there are 20-30 Million illegal immigrants in this country which has a stagnant economy and flat income growth for decades. They are pissed that for many decades we've entered into idiotic trade agreements which were always one sided or where the other side ignored anything that placed restraints on them and only complied with the beneficial parts. They are pissed that one side for 8 years just says "its all the other sides fault" as if that's going to change anything or fix anything.

Doesn't shock me that you still don't get that.

These are among the many reasons Trump is your President.

Spending the next 4 years writing 10 posts for every Trump fart in a perpetual ********** state of emotional meltdown isn't going to fix any root problems which put Trump in office.

And by the way, when you're so biased that the only way you can make sense of the world is to believe that 1/2 the voting public (i.e. anyone that doesn't share your views) is "stupid", "crazy", "greedy", 'brainwashed" then you are also just as big a part of the problem. Name calling and simplistic adolescent reductions of complex issues and problems doesn't bring anyone closer to solutions, understanding or a better world.

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21344782)

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21344782)

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21344782)

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.