![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Banks in Azerbaijan that have courted the shadowy trade in spam-advertised pharmaceuticals now have cornered the market for processing credit card payments for fake antivirus software, new data reveals. In June, KrebsOnSecurity highlighted research from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) showing that Azerigazbank, a financial institution in Azerbaijan, was the primary merchant bank for most major online-fraud pharmacy affiliate programs. By the time that research was published, those programs had moved their business to another bank in Azerbaijan, JSCB Bank Standard. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/07/...pharma-market/ |
So glad I finally blocked crockett.
His anger and ranting & raving just got to be too much. PLEASE don't quote him anymore. I don't even want to see his b.s. It's depressing to think that a fellow human being could be so full of hate and vitriol. |
Quote:
|
funny (or sad) thing is, cuckett is calling everyone who doesn't believe the 24/7 hate and propaganda mill 'brain dead'... irony at its best
|
Quote:
You are not my reader, GFY is not a news site, You don't know the difference. |
Quote:
It's not that he was paid in cash. It's that it was with an entity that has ties with terrorist organizations. Read the whole thing at Donald Trump’s Worst Deal - The New Yorker. It's really interesting. To Trump's credit, maybe he didn't know that he might be breaking the law. However, The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (1977) says that even if you unknowingly participated, you can still be guilty. The exact text says "The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, passed in 1977, forbade American companies from participating in a scheme to reward a foreign government official in exchange for material benefit or preferential treatment. The law even made it a crime for an American company to unknowingly benefit from a partner’s corruption if it could have discovered illicit activity but avoided doing so. This closed what was known as the “head in the sand” loophole." On a related topic, this can be pretty scary. How would anyone know if you're dealing with someone like this? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mark, what I'm reading is that the people "behind the project" are "close relatives to a guy named Mammadov who is part of the govt. in charge of projects.
And an unnamed (of course) U.S. official said this guy is even more corrupt than the other people of the country. So stopping right there for one second...a "U.S. official" says this as a source? For what reason would this person NOT go on the record? Just ridiculous. And then this "U.S. official" who we aren't allowed to know his identity because you know...he works for us...basically says that everybody in the country is "corrupt", but this guy Mammadov is the worst of the bunch. Nice racism there. :( And then much further down...if you can keep from falling asleep with the wall of breathless text...we are told that the Mammadov FAMILY (whatever that means in this context): "for years, it has been financially entangled with an Iranian family tied to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps" So a guy knows a guy who knows a guy who has invested money with a "family" in Iran who is "tied" to Iran's Revolutionary Guard???? Seriously? And now Trump is in BIG trouble. I think the media is really, really grasping at every straw they can. IF that's the kind of thing that causes trouble...then Hillary and Bill would have long ago been in prison with the Clinton Foundation. EVERYBODY in the Middle East is related to a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who has a family in Iran who know a guy. I can't take that kind of story with ANY seriousness at all. I don't think that Bill and Hillary should go to jail either for the shit they pull in the Middle East with their foundation. |
Quote:
Howdy. Of course, you could be right, but then again, not everyone wants to release facts and state their names, which is why for now anyway, this could all just be fluff. Trump would not go to jail unless there was actual real proof of this, with actual witnesses and sworn statements, etc. The sub-title of the article includes "Appears to be", after all. Trust me, I'm all about proof. So far it LOOKS like Trump is a "bad dude" (his words), and it "looks like" he has all kinds of ties to all kinds of nasty people. It's easy to draw conclusions form appearances but appearances isn't what puts people behind bars. Only facts. |
I just saw a few minutes of the OReilly Factor on Fox News while I was eating a sandwich.
O'Reilly had a Senator from Arkansas on who is on the Intelligence Committee. He wouldn't answer anything outright that had to do with intelligence gathering, but O'Reilly pushed him hard and got him to admit the he KNOWS which agency leaked the conversation between Gen. Flynn and the Russian ambassador. (which is a felony to leak that) Anyway...the interview was pretty interesting as O'Reilly really kept dogging this Republican to give him some info on what they know. The one thing that really caught my attention was this: He explained that the DOJ was run by the Obama Administration until Jan. 20th. And that the FBI is of course...part of the DOJ. He said that all of the former Obama officials who worked there until Jan. 20th had access to all kinds of classified info. And he said it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out that those Obama people are the "Former DOJ and FBI officials" that the media uses as their "Source" for the allegations they keep making on a daily basis. My guess is that the "unnamed US official" was a Democrat who worked under the Obama administration and is just as angry about Trump winning the election as all the Democrats in Washington D.C. are. CNN and the New York Times and Washington Post and Rolling Stone and pretty much any media outlet aren't telling us who these sources are...because they know that the story's would no longer hold any credence if it was revealed that it's political b.s. That's just the way things have been since Trump won the election. Remember? CNN and Hillary Clinton and all the Democrats were saying that when Trump lost by the landslide that they were so wrong about...he needed to accept the results and support Hillary as President. And if he didn't...he was destroying "our" democracy. Funny how since day one of Trump taking office, the Democrats have funded, attended, and publicized protests in the streets against Pres. Trump and Chuck Schumer (who has been a close friend of Trump for decades) came out and said that he would lead the Senate Democrats to oppose ANYTHING that Trump does. Doesn't matter what it is or if it's beneficial to helping people get good jobs or even if Trump cures cancer...Schumer and the Democrats are going to oppose it. Sounds exactly like what they said Trump SHOULDN'T do when they erroneously thought Hillary was going to win. lol The hypocrisy of these politicians and CNN is just astounding. EDIT: Drifting back to the Flynn conversation with the Russian Ambassador for a second...O'Reilly also asked the Arkansas Republican on the Intelligence Committee if he knew if Flynn had been inside Trump tower when that conversation took place that was wiretapped. The guy wouldn't answer...but in light of Trump saying that Obama had Trump Tower under surveillance, this whole thing could blow up in the Democrats faces if that turns out to be true. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know, leaks don't happen when things are rosy and going great. They happen when there's a shit circus that needs to be exposed. That's what whistleblowing is all about...blowing a whistle on bullshit that needs to see the light of day. You Republicans are so caught up in your golden boy getting ratted out, you forget how egregious the charges are and should taken VERY seriously. All of this smoke means there's fire. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We both know Trump has absolutely nothing to do with Russia. It's a total farse 100% made up to distract us from Trump's agenda and his landslide victory |
Quote:
Once again Trump is proven to have lied about meeting Russians. It's now come out Trump himself met with the Russian ambassador at a "INVITE ONLY" after speech reception. Means yes the Russian ambassador was invited to be there.. First it was no one in his campaign, then it was Flynn, Trump's Son, then sessions now Trump.. Seems for "NO ONE" having contacts we are seeing lots of meetings and contacts with Russians.. You ask so many questions wanting proof but time and time again Trump has lied to you and you always excuse it away. Why don't you hold Trump to the same standards you hold us on GFY? |
Quote:
Okay? Again where's the proof that he "colluded" with "russia" to "hack" the election? Dude you are grasping at straws to say the least here |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Years ago Trump sold an estate in Florida to a Russian billionaire named Dmitry Rybolovlev. It seems that his plane showed up on Trump's campaign trail multiple times, including Florida, Vegas, Charlotte, etc.... One of the flights was really odd. They claim the plane needed to take on fuel for... what was a twenty-four mile flight. This is an airplane that can fly across oceans. The connections from Russians to Trump is stacking up, and you know we'll find even more in the near future. White House denounces 'conspiracy' on Trump, Rybolovlev - Business Insider |
Lol...fake news
|
I hope Trump has to spend every last penny he has on defense lawyers.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Once you start going down the road of politicians legal, moral, ethical, dealings you're in great a great area. One that would empty most Governments. Because you keep voting for corruption. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why are you just realising political systems are corruptible while people insist on voting the way they do?? |
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...pam3wk7hpi.jpg https://i.ytimg.com/vi/o4SZ49_bS0Y/maxresdefault.jpg Quote:
http://rumafia.com/en/dosje/54-dmitriy-rybolovlev.html Source: «The New York Times» from 05 декабря 2008 The conflict around the name of Rybolovlev burst in 2008 when two companies - Uralkali and Silvinit (Rybolovlev owns 25 percent of shares in it) - claimed the lands of Verkhnekamskoye deposit.?Silvinit? won an auction, but Rybolovlev (who owns a large stake in the company and has long dreamed of control over "Silvinit") promised to block the attraction of credits on the development of the site. Owners of "Silvinit, in turn, suggested Rybolovlev $ 2 billion for his stake. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Last I heard the Trump Organization is a US corporation subject to US laws. Donald J Trump is an officer of the corporation, Chairman of the Board at the time this occurred most likely. Corporate Officers can be criminally liable as a corporation is a legal person -- the legal person (the corporation) cannot be sent to jail. |
This isn't even grasping at straws, this is literally just making shit up
|
Quote:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...00cb51462b.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chill a bit...those hackers..were probably Americans not russians |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hopefully you're aware the only way for our systems to change worldwide is a big war with a lot of destruction, which could be coming. America has 3 branches of government that balance our power. No matter how shitty Trump is, and how much he wants to destroy the system, the other two branches will compensate. (i.e. If Trump wants to find something, he has to go through congress, they are the purse strings.) They will not find Trumps wall scam. In America you can't break the system from within and any president (the executive branch) has no power to change or destroy the 535 members of congress (Legislative) or the supreme court (Judicial) and vice versa. The GOP in congress is fighting Trump he is powerless but for creating executive orders & controlling the military. If Hillary was POTUS the GOP would be fighting her as well because the are the majority in the House and Senate (Congress) |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123