^*nanomedicine

Look, when the printing press became in use the job 'scribe' was 99.99% eliminated -- displaced scribes found new work. Scribe was a well paid job in its day.

@paul: the margin of error is 16% to 40% in the data https://www2.census.gov/programs-sur...pov_table5.xls

That chart is a joke -- meaningless but great cherry picking propaganda. FAKE CHART!!!

source: https://www2.census.gov/programs-sur...olds/h01ar.xls

The historical trend is that the are LESS people in the bottom 20% of wage earners. The problem in the USA in the last 20 years is that the number of 'unemployables' has grown. These unemployables for the most part have nothing to offer in the way of contemporary skills. Maybe, one third could be trained to acquire new skills. The rest are of limited intelligence and UBI (universal income) candidates or ...(well, let's not go there).

1968 was a pivot year. Both Medicare and the Civil Rights Act took effect.

Your chart is meaningless and there are more people in the bottom 20%. By using percentages and not counting the unemployed the figures are manipulated.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._1890-2008.gif

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1357116/original.jpg

https://sequ.com/wp-content/uploads/low-paying-jobs.png

The problems we face today aren't created by the economy, they're due to automation, globalisation and migration. The number of people with nothing to offer is growing by the day.

As for better training, will you pay more in taxes for better schools and teachers?

Did I read this increase wrong?

No, I took the government xls datafiles.

Anyway

Table H-1. Income Limits for Each Fifth and Top 5 Percent of All Households: 1967 to 2015
(Households as of March of the following year. Income in current and 2015 CPI-U-RS adjusted dollars (28))


Year =C108/B108
Year = Lowest/"Number (thousands)" = % of the total
the lowest 1/5 (20%) count is declining.

in thousands

https://s2.postimg.org/ifz1jgsqh/income-divide.jpg
https://www2.census.gov/programs-sur...olds/h01ar.xls
Here is the real data and a real graph. The lowest 20% is almost static while the households number count has increased over the years. Look at the lowest 20% of household income.

How can anyone be pro-technology and part of the porn industry?

After all what the hell are tube sites if not tech destroying income and jobs?

Technology causes a brief blip in jobs and income as the public rushes in to use the newest gadgets. But quickly thereafter there starts to be less money in an industry and what's left is quickly dominated by an incredibly small group of players. Shortly afterwards all the good playing jobs start to disappear or get replaced by low paying unskilled labor.

It wasn't that long ago in the jizz biz when we used to have highly trained film crews, pornstars that could actually act, theaters, budgets more than a $250k, etc.

In short I invest in people and skills not machines.

I was dividing apples and pears numbers and dollars -- my error

However, 20% will always be 1/5

so the number of families would grow.

https://s17.postimg.org/pmdj2ud5b/in...t-usa-2015.jpg

Source: https://www2.census.gov/programs-sur...olds/h03ar.xls

There is no change however there is no upward mobility for the bottom 20%. Why do you think that is? Either they have little to offer or they haven't the means (still, luck and/or money) to succeed. Enough about society's inequities -- that is a constant.

And they elect a rich guy who will fix everything ... LMAO :laughing-

And the last guy "they" elected was a person with ZERO experience at anything other than being a student and a community organizer in corrupt Chicago.

And yet you are convinced he was so great.

But he left office with none of these problems solved. Just like every other politician/bureaucrat before him with all of their promises.

Hope and Change?
The only thing that changed is Obama came into the White House without a lot of money.
He left the White House a multi-millionaire.

And how did you do financially during the last 8 years? I'm gonna guess not as good as President Obama did for himself.

I did just fine through out the last 10 years financially; net worth and income. And I will do just fine the next 10 years regardless of the next politician. I don't look for excuses or someone to blame.

There is no "excuses" or "blame".

The fact is that the business community is excited for a pro-business administration.
You did "fine". I guess that's relative. Your idea of "fine" and mine could be two different things brother.

I'm telling you now...the iron is HOT. Open your eyes, expand your business opportunities.

I wasn't even trying...and it turns out that quite a few people in the mainstream side of business were just waiting for a better business environment to make their move to expand.

And when they did...my phone rang.
Never did business with any of them before. Just people I knew socially who knew someone else and they knew someone else....and it turns out that the many skill sets I have are in high demand.

I don't know what your skills are...but you may have abilities that you didn't even realize were valuable on the market.

I partnered up. Maybe you can too?
But you're gonna find that if/when you actually work with mainstream business...a lot of them are very pro-Trump.
So do yourself a favor and keep your socialist-type views to yourself if/when you find yourself in a situation to move forward.

Good luck to you. :)

I don't like Trump and it has nothing to do with money.
The few things good Obama did seem to upset a lot of folks -- but like that chart shows -- most of the benefit went to the top feeders.
I don't care what someone else makes -- that never bothered me.

I make a lot more, and my net worth is a lot more in the past 10 years -- to answer your question. I will make more the next 10 years as well.

Wish I had a nickel for every guy in the porn biz I've known since the mid 1990's who said that same thing. lol

They're all gone now. I'm still standing. :pimp

Thank for your good wishes ... How many nickels would you have? WTF are nickels anyway LMAO.

Heh-heh...nickels are a coin worth 5 cents in the U.S.

It's kind of an old "saying" here...Like: "If I had a nickel for every time a woman turned me down, I'd be rich!" lol

You're great at adapting, inovating and growing. Robbie is stuck in the 90's with his content filming the same woman with different men, never changing, his role in the business, and content, never changes.

Thats fucking creepy

https://media4.giphy.com/media/PjwjL....webp#33-grid1

That doll is every woman's worst nightmare.

We knew automation was putting fast food workers out of work...but who knew it would make women obsolete! Lol

There is a real doll ho house already...sheeeet I would fuck it I am just too lazy to clean it...

The graph proves that it'snot just the lowest 20%. It's the bottom 60% or more.

Add inflation from 1967 to today. https://westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi

It's not that these people have nothing to offer. It's because society has taken away the offers. These are your customers so stop thinking it doesn't affect you. It's been eating away at your income for a long time. You rely on how much disposable cash your potential customers have.

After looking at Barry's chart why do you think this is about Obama or Trump?

When you say people should be paid what they're worth. Does that apply to you and Tubes?

Especially the leftard ones who were cheering for increasing burger flipping wages to ridiculous sums.

That chart IS adjusted for inflation: 'constant 2015 dollars' -- says so right in the title.

look at the source file.