GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   rochard what is your assessment of (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1288197)

crockett 12-19-2017 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22124517)
I disagree. There is always a power vacuum at the end of a war. However, this was vastly different than Germany or Japan after WWII.

First, there is a new way fighting wars. We are "too nice". At the close of WWII the governments, military, and general population of Germany and Japan were just utterly exhausted. They had five or six years of unrestricted warfare that brought everyone to their knees. This never happened with Iraq - it was over too quick, and they just picked up their pieces and went back to what they doing as if nothing ever happened.

Second, for political reasons, we didn't want to occupy Iraq. Look at how we treated Germany and Japan for decades. To this day the United States still has large military bases and both countries. And we will for decades to come.

War is a final option, and it needs to be brutal. Not only do you need to destroy the will of the government and the military to continue the fight, but you also have to break the will of the people. The people themselves have to say "Holy shit, I am going through that again and I will spend the rest of my life ensuring it doesn't happen again". We don't that have now. Instead of rising up from the ashes and discovering every last person in their family is dead, they just brush themselves off and are back in business in three days.

You making the same mistake Bush made and thinking the middle east is comparable to world war 2.

We are not fighting govts there, we are fighting relgious ideology that goes back thousands of years. We are not going to bomb them into submission.. Has that worked for Iseral with the Palestinians? Iseral, literally bulldozes these peoples homes to build walls and these people havent given up..They still fight back..

If the shoe was on the other foot and Muslims had invaded the West and overthrown our govts and patrolled our streets with their armies do you think westerners would give up a d not fight back and live in submission?


We are dealing with two very different ideologies betwen tne west and middle east. As long as each are left to do their own thing we can live side by side with little conflict. The problem is when one side starts interfearing with the other...

This history goes back to bibical times and fighting of the crusades.. Our invasion of Iraq was looked at as yet another crusade by the west to the extreme Islamist and they were able to use that as a recruiting tool.

The iraq war is the dirrect result in what has happened with the golbal jihad we now face. That war along with Afghan war allowed then to provoke goat herders into a gobal jihadist which had very little world wide support prior to us bombing their holy lands..


Bush Sr then Bush hr had a hard on for oil in Iraq and now the world deals with their mistake of poking sticks in the bees nest. Russia made the same mistake in the 80s and it bankrupted them.

Bladewire 12-19-2017 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dillonaire (Post 22124520)
Not sure if some of you are aware, but the election is over. Trump won. The country didnt fall into the ocean. Stock Market went up and the unemployment rate down. Its been a year already. Who cares! Move the fuck on dot com

Trump said the unemployment numbers are fake and easily manipulated.

Trump removed the safeguards that Obama put in place to avoid another recesdion due yo market bubbles, of course the stock market is soaring.

And when Trump pushed us into another recession, you'll blame Obama :1orglaugh

ilnjscb 12-19-2017 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22124484)
See this is your problem..you mistake facts and breaking the law with the need to convince someone about political opinions..

The law doesnt give a rats ass if its in agreement of your political opnion.. due to Trump's business dealings he can be convicted at the state level in NY or other states he does business if its found out he illegally launderd money.

If congress fails to act, Trump will get taken down by the NY DA office once this all plays out. You seem to not be paying much attention to how this is going down. Muller is worki g with the NY DA office on this for that very reason... in case Trump tries to pardon himself or others or if Congress fails to act.. at that point the NY DA office goes forward with the criminal case.

Trump thanks to his businesses is in a unique position to be charged at the state level if congress fails to act or if he tries to use the power of pardon. Congress and presidential pardons have no athority over a state DA..

You have no idea what you're talking about. The NY DA? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh - they have NO jurisdiction over federal statutes and could not impact Trump at all. That was done to intimidate witnesses so Trump could not just pardon all the players. That was also done to apply pressure to Trump's SIL.

ilnjscb 12-19-2017 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22123719)
But there is a huge difference between the two.

Clinton lied under oath when answering a highly personal question in front of his wife that had nothing to do with the investigation. This was (for lack of a better term) a "nothing burger".

If there is any level of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, Trump would most likely be impeached and removed from office. Even if there is no collusion, they could try to pin him with obstruction of justice. At the same time we have no idea what his finances is turning up.

I agree with you, Clinton should never have been impeached. But it doesn't matter. The process is not described as, nor has it ever been, a legal process. It is a political process.

Trump will not be impeached without a Democrat majority, and he will never be convicted and removed without a clear showing of collusion.

crockett 12-19-2017 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22124559)
You have no idea what you're talking about. The NY DA? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh - they have NO jurisdiction over federal statutes and could not impact Trump at all. That was done to intimidate witnesses so Trump could not just pardon all the players. That was also done to apply pressure to Trump's SIL.

You dont pay attention much do you? Trump's empire is based out of NY.. if his companies committed fraud the NY DA sure the fuck can and will go after him.. Just because he's potus it doesnt make him untouchable at the state level.

The diffrence in Trump vs previous presidents os all others removedthemselves from any business interest they had before coming to office. Trump didnt do this and now it makes him vunerable where ever he hold business interest.

Rochard 12-19-2017 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22124550)
You making the same mistake Bush made and thinking the middle east is comparable to world war 2.

We are not fighting govts there, we are fighting relgious ideology that goes back thousands of years. We are not going to bomb them into submission.. Has that worked for Iseral with the Palestinians? Iseral, literally bulldozes these peoples homes to build walls and these people havent given up..They still fight back..

You are correct - they are vastly different wars. And I am saying we treated them vastly different. With Germany - and Japan - we firebombed entire cities out of existence. They were exhausted and done. What we did with Iraq and Afghanistan we did with little pinpicks.

I understand there are vast differences, however, we didn't give them all war. We gave them a limited war.

Rochard 12-19-2017 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22124562)
I agree with you, Clinton should never have been impeached. But it doesn't matter. The process is not described as, nor has it ever been, a legal process. It is a political process.

Trump will not be impeached without a Democrat majority, and he will never be convicted and removed without a clear showing of collusion.

The entire thing was ridiculous. They had no right to interview them about the investigation. They had no right to put under oath. And they had on valid reason to ask such questions that were unrelated to the original investigation.

That's fine. The Republican party established, through Kenneth Starr, that we can in fact put a sitting president under oath for an investigation, and then ask him if he has ever cheated on his wife.

Do you see where this can go now? We now have a perfectly valid reason to put Trump under oath, and we now have a valid reason to ask Trump if he has had sexual relations with any of the sixteen women who have accused him of whatever. When he lies under oath about not knowing them, or not being there that day, we can charge with lying under oath.

#winning.

Rochard 12-19-2017 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22125264)
You dont pay attention much do you? Trump's empire is based out of NY.. if his companies committed fraud the NY DA sure the fuck can and will go after him.. Just because he's potus it doesnt make him untouchable at the state level.

The diffrence in Trump vs previous presidents os all others removedthemselves from any business interest they had before coming to office. Trump didnt do this and now it makes him vunerable where ever he hold business interest.

Oh.... The Whitewater investigation tells us the President is in fact not above the law, and will be called to testify.

OneHungLo 12-19-2017 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22125306)
Do you see where this can go now? We now have a perfectly valid reason to put Trump under oath, and we now have a valid reason to ask Trump if he has had sexual relations with any of the sixteen women who have accused him of whatever. When he lies under oath about not knowing them, or not being there that day, we can charge with lying under oath.

#winning.

LOL wow you guys are seriously delusional. Do you actually believe that has a snowball's chance in hell at happening? I guess that whole Russian collusion thingy isn't working out so you're grasping at straws now.

dillonaire 12-19-2017 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22124556)
Trump said the unemployment numbers are fake and easily manipulated.

Trump removed the safeguards that Obama put in place to avoid another recesdion due yo market bubbles, of course the stock market is soaring.

And when Trump pushed us into another recession, you'll blame Obama :1orglaugh

I dont care who is president. To me, it doesnt make a difference.

I can tell you the jobs numbers are real from my own experience. I've been trying to hire an in-office position (not in bay area), but in a decent size city and I am getting the lowest response rate to a job posting i have ever experienced. Crazy. I rewrote and reposted several times.

Bladewire 12-19-2017 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dillonaire (Post 22125462)
I dont care who is president. To me, it doesnt make a difference.

I can tell you the jobs numbers are real from my own experience. I've been trying to hire an in-office position (not in bay area), but in a decent size city and I am getting the lowest response rate to a job posting i have ever experienced. Crazy. I rewrote and reposted several times.

Yeah it's all bullshit anyway were not stupid but a lot of people are.

dillonaire 12-20-2017 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22125306)
The entire thing was ridiculous. They had no right to interview them about the investigation. They had no right to put under oath. And they had on valid reason to ask such questions that were unrelated to the original investigation.

That's fine. The Republican party established, through Kenneth Starr, that we can in fact put a sitting president under oath for an investigation, and then ask him if he has ever cheated on his wife.

Do you see where this can go now? We now have a perfectly valid reason to put Trump under oath, and we now have a valid reason to ask Trump if he has had sexual relations with any of the sixteen women who have accused him of whatever. When he lies under oath about not knowing them, or not being there that day, we can charge with lying under oath.

#winning.

Poor trump is getting tired from all this winning.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...77/365/7c4.png

ilnjscb 12-22-2017 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22125264)
You dont pay attention much do you? Trump's empire is based out of NY.. if his companies committed fraud the NY DA sure the fuck can and will go after him.. Just because he's potus it doesnt make him untouchable at the state level.

The diffrence in Trump vs previous presidents os all others removedthemselves from any business interest they had before coming to office. Trump didnt do this and now it makes him vunerable where ever he hold business interest.

Totally stupid. They don't have the ability to impact the president during his term in office. There is no settled legal opinion that you can use state law to remove or even hold the president. It would go to the supreme court, and they would decide 5-4 or more in favor of letting the constitutionally defined process, i.e. impeachment, be the process by which crimes and misdemeanors are handled.

After he leaves office and is a private citizen, that is another matter. However, opposing partings traditionally leave ex-presidents alone because of the potential for reciprocal action.

You are wishful thinking

Paul Markham 12-23-2017 09:05 AM

It's Macarthyism all over again. And a lot of Americans fall for it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123