Simple, driving a car is not a right, owning a gun is.

More laws won't change anything. Criminals dont follow the law.

In a world where charles Manson died of old age, people wonder why this shit happens?

:1orglaugh

you are fucking sick in your head !

hope the next driver without licence drives in your dumb ass

Hey shit for brains, owning a gun is a guaranteed right given to us by the constitution of the United States, driving a car is not. It is a privilege. Just how fucking stupid are you?

You call me dumb and have not a fucking clue about the constitution and how it works!

Do us all a favor and shut the fuck up, the grown ups are talking

waste of time to dialogue with the guy... he ain't that smart, just forget about it.

I gathered that.

And now look at Sweden-

Sweden Is Not Only the Rape Capital of Europe, It’s the Grenade Attack Capital

Sweden Records 170 Percent Increase In Grenade Attacks, And It’s Not Hard To Figure Out Why


I prefer facts :2 cents::thumbsup:thumbsup

:rasta

better you 2 alcoholics talk together and count the purple elephants what are driving bicycle in your garden.

i can not believe how such dumbs can belong to the species homo sapiens.

the next dumb ....

this was already when the world hoped that you will never be born.

Ever since the collation of crime statistics was initiated by the Council of Europe, Sweden has had the highest number of registered rape offences in Europe by a considerable extent. In 1996, Sweden registered almost three times the average number of rape offences registered in 35 European countries.

you are such a nut!

Hey shit for brains, get off the mushrooms, you are talking about shit that has nothing to do with the conversation. You really are fucking stupid!

when I look at crime stats I really do not expect to see 'grenade attacks' you know what I'm sayin'? obviously they really need grenade control :2 cents:

pink elephants :disgust

hey go do something fun :winkwink:

I don't know if the NRA realises that each time Americans kill each other, it's applauded by the enemies of America. :(

I'm sure everyone knows that whats your point? am I supposed to be appalled or what? blown away by your insight? :)

Sad you live in a dictatorship and happy you are Putins slave it brings a smile to my face

We agree here :thumbsup

manson never killed anybody :2 cents:

I am glad we FINALLY AGREE :thumbsup:thumbsup

The founding fathers did not think of cars but they clearly did about the latest weapons...

So every citizen should have the right to own a front loading musket and unlimited amount of lead balls and black powder. Further if he owns a horse he should be entitled to own a sabre....:thumbsup No more No less.
The intent is the same.:2 cents:

and a knight armor, petroleum lamp and a horse

btw - the word "arms" does not mean guns, right? it means all weapons.
so why not nukes ?
that would bring the thing to an end a little faster.

I said horse :pimp:1orglaugh

You are right on the rest...." I would be peckish for a can of fosgene gas to protect my homestead"....:1orglaugh

..and do not even try to get me on what was meant by " well regulated militia"....other then a town's well stocked and LOCKED armoury and where the menfolk ( and yes it was a menfolk) had to go twice a year to practice loading and shooting the muskets before returning the muskets to the armoury, and where they were called to arms ONLY when goverment attacked them....

Even then a military grade musket was not kept in private hands...:2 cents:

We clearly diagree. The constitution is not going to keep inovation stagnet.To let The police and those that are in the power to try and control us rise in inovation is just plain stupid, try and educate yourself in what the founding fathers said about the need for the second amendment.making up shit shows you clearly havent a clue of what you are talking about.

these guys are only here to argue.. let it slide... :2 cents:

I love how gun owners feel so big and powerful when they hold a gun. I bet it makes their dick feel bigger too.

But I also love how gun owners think their little guns are going to stop ANY Government when the shit hits the fan. But go ahead Cowboys, think y'all are bad asses and real 'Mericans and will show that dang Gov't mule how a real Militia will keep it in line!

God Americans are fucking moronic, pathetic idiots when it comes to guns and the size of their wee little dickies.

correct - and don´t forget that this "militia" has a legal successor - what is the national guard.....

ok let´s be serious for a moment (and i mean it)

i think we can agree that the word "arms" does not mean only guns it means every kind of weapon.

so now let´s assume only for a minute (i know you will not like it and i swear i will not do it) that i get tomorrow a green card - move to the usa and i can prove that i am healthy and without prior crime problems.

now i want a little nuke for my defense...

so now i have 2 questions and want you answer them as precise as you can.

1. do you want that i have this right to buy a nuke ?

and

2. if you think i will NOT have it WHY SHOULD I NOT HAVE IT ?

thanks for your kind answer in advance

You cleary dont know what they meant by militia.

You clearly dont have any intent in being serious.

I can beat you to death with my bare hands, i dont know why you think i need a gun for that.? And i have a huge cock .

ok so let´s ask the cambridge dictonary what this word means:

source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/...glisch/militia





so that means

1. you do not WANT to answer
2. you CAN NOT answer
3. while thinking on your answer you realized what big BS you talk ?

Indeed you are.

:thumbsup

not sure about other gun owners only a dumbfuck would try and say a large group of varied individuals would all have the exact same personality and goals...

really dude? are you going with that? note to self: this guy is less than spectacular in the brains dept. wow, and now I'm supposed to *think* you know what the fuck you are talking about AND agree with you whole hearty...really dude? :2 cents:

You are right. We should no longer drive cars. Or trucks.

EVERYTHING in your life depends on cars and trucks. But you cannot say that about firearms.

I slept between fision and fusion within 20 ft of each other, i know more about the subject than anyone on this forum.i choose to not answer stupid questions, come up with a valid one and get back to me you moron!

Why not? Because you say so? I stand by the statement, owning a gun is a right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment, driving a car is privilege managed by the state.

aha you know so much and fear to answer a simple question?

come on give me your answer and i cut in in pieces because you CAN NOT find a logic answer because there is no answer what i can not use against your argument you dumfuck.

you may know where to buy the cheapest alcohol in which to drown your miserable lives but you do not know any more, you stupid old fart.

First i need to know a question thats not so fucking stupid. Where exactly are you going to get a nuke? Lets talk about facts, not the voices in your head

Putin soft pussy, not a dictator )))

Thommy,
Your logic here is circular: because you believe the expression "to bear arms" to have only a collective, military meaning, you dismiss contrary examples. There is no analysis of variation in usage supporting your contention that such examples are erroneous or idiosyncratic. The statement that gun haters quote from Gary Wills, that "one does not bear arms against a rabbit", is irrelevant. The reason one does not "bear arms against a rabbit" is that "against" implies hostile action, but one does not normally consider rabbits to be the enemy, even if one is hunting them for their food and skin. If, in a postapocalyptic world, we were threatened by three meter tall intelligent carnivorous rabbits, we certainly might bear arms against them. A person who hunts rabbits as they are today cannot be said to bear arms against rabbits, but he or she may indeed be said to bear arms during the hunt.

Why not beat me to death with your huge cock? Too gay? Better overcompensate by holding a gun. :)

You don't have to think anything from my post "dude". But thanks for confirming the inherent point to it: gun owners cannot take a joke, over-compensate like crazy, and take any anti-gun comment as a slur. Most (not all) gun owners are scared little pussies overcompensating with their bang bang toys.

Now I hate to shock you "dude" but this is how many, many non-gun owners feel about gun owners. Maybe not the kind who have a firearm for protection or a shotgun for hunting. You know the kind of gun owners I mean. The kind that go to gun shows, wear Army fatigues, have 50+ guns (and wish they had a thousand). The NUTS.

Guns make you feel powerful. I've fired guns (at ranges). I am not the first to point this out. But gun "enthusiasts" (we shall call them) are WAY too sensitive about the entire gun issue. Why is that? Because they know deep down (as I suspect you do too) that owning all those bang bang toys is fucked up.

First you attack then play the part of the fool, then the victim, are you that fucking stupid that we actually buy that?

Don't attack then think you will win in this fools argument, i wouldn't beat you with my huge cock, you would like that way too much!

why are you referring to countries where you have never been and to times when you wasn´t even born????

USA just voted for their dictator and their guns will not help them against tanks and drones.

but you are russian - you are same blind - just on the other eye.

And the one hundred winner is.....

https://emailmg.globat.com/roundcube...ing=1&_embed=1