![]() |
Quote:
|
Indeed there was another update on March 28th https://www.seroundtable.com/google-...ate-25488.html
This is the first time I noticed Google released 2 updates in 1 month! |
anybody notice something from yesterday?
less or more traffic from google? |
Quote:
|
this is how my google traffic behaved during march and beyond, pretty much all sites on similar pattern (after being stable for ages):
http://oi65.tinypic.com/28ixa2d.jpg also, porn serps are pretty ODD (to say the least) example being, check this site: https://www.semrush.com/info/mzansi.porn?db=us few months old, 1.5 million.... top results for some ultra heavy keywords and countless more scrape / embed tubes and such stuff across many porn niches that I checked with all that being said, I somehow believe there is a "correction" incoming soon (could be wishful thinking but current state of results is just.. SILLY) |
Agreed with the majority of comments on here. The results aren't as accurate as they were.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
what are effected are this kind of sites what are just made to send a user to one specific product (20 years ago we called them doorwaypages). so IF a site is only made for selling one specific product and google can see that in the searchkey WHY should they send a user first to an affiliate site? that does not make sense. if you search for amazon would you want they show you 100 affiliate sites and hide amazon.com ??? or if you search for "buying an iphone" would you expect to be send to a site what sends you to the shopping site or would you expect to see the shopping site right away? this update is not done yet and it will takes weeks (if not months) til it is complete. and after it is complete you will see even more fluctuation because google announced that already 2 years ago that they are working on a "single page index" what means nothing else that you can own a domain with 100 k subpages and if only ONE is relevant only this one page will appear (before the complete domain did not appear in such a case). and they announced also that they will react in near real time. and that means that your page can be number 1 in the morning and a few hours later you will not find it anymore. I am wondering why everybody is so surprised about what happens - google told us LONG BEFORE what they are planing to do. there is also not a war against porn. I have a document from google what is deserved to their search qualitiy editors (they have hundreds up to thousands of them in each country) where they explain how to rate porn and erotic on a huge number of pages of this document . and there you can even see how difficult it is for them because the porn definition is different in every country. |
Quote:
they are still lightyears away from that on all aspects, IF it is even possible, considering google has huge issues with differentiating original content vs copied and usually disregards the originality in favor of site power (backlinks and infamous "trust" score) in layman's terms.. you can write a super original mega article but if New York post or such republishes it AS IS a month after you, they'll rank above you for your article title and such Quote:
but regardless, algorithm and manual, they are doing a bad job in purging bad porn sites from top of serps When their algorithm manages to penalize: - insane amounts of ads - traffic trading - content scraping - cloaking from googlebot And when it actually starts to reward original content (first instance of it in index), then we will all have nice websites in mainstream and porn, with nice high quality stuff on them. Until then...... we can only play a guessing game on wtf is their "core update" targeting. |
Quote:
But this is not the original site. The site moved from freepornxxx.name->mzansi.porn , and the first backlink discovered at 12 May 2017. Lots of irrelevant domains, even music related ,from a large variety of countries. Seems legit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh More than obvious that these backlinks are not natural, so much for the "web spam" google team :1orglaugh |
Yay, I haven't seen our short keywords on page 1-2 in years. Usually was all the free sites. Good to see Scoreland and XLGirls up there.
|
Quote:
considering I had my share of confusing google results (site: query was showing some totally unrelated sites), it could even be that google somehow valued his site more because he had xhamster and such branding in it it's kind of a conspiracy theory but I don't know what to think anymore |
just noticed the graph pic of my google traffic isn't working in post above, so here is another try to display it via remote host:
https://preview.ibb.co/jyLNRc/download.png |
Quote:
Do you have a source on this? |
Quote:
|
The algorithm is working absolutely wrong right now. One of my sites lost almost all visits from Google, but still doing well because its content is 100% unique. On the other hand, the first pages are occupied by tubes with low quality content. These are results that completely refute the theory of quality content and uniqueness. On the contrary-currently Google is too far away from that.
Someone wrote about Amazon. On several of my sites I notice visits based on the keyword Amazon, which is ridiculous. This update is not anti porn it's just anti search. For example I searched for dental xray lab yesterday. The first 2 results were OK, but the third was for a hypermarket with a section of professional cameras. So Google isn't doing well even with normal, domestic searches right now I also believe that a great corrective update is imminent very soon because the last one is completely questionable. |
Quote:
SEO for porn and SEO for mainstream are two things, despite what googlers said |
What I've seen from experience, Google's announced strategies and intentions never coincide exactly with how their algorithm displays on SERPs
Anyone who believes that "Google says, Google does" does not know much by experience, only textbook knowledge |
Quote:
1st of all this documents explains the strategy of google overall and on pages 119-121 it is regarding how to rate porn in regards to country specific oddities. i do not see a reason why google should explain their own editors something wrong, do you ? http://static.googleusercontent.com/...guidelines.pdf |
Quote:
if someone is reading this information instead the SEO shit they would understand more about googles philosophy from first hand. |
Once again, to summarize:
1. google quality raters don't have a difficult job - trained chimps could do it 2. this update has nothing to do with change of "google philosophy" I wrote it nearly a month ago and I'm repeating it again, this all smells like some kind of backlink recalculation update gone wrong. |
In this video we see the famous actress aidra fox showing themselves to us all. He begins teaching her beautiful body and how you can enjoy it herself. Then invites his friend to join your game, this puts into four and start making it do a cunnilingus maximum enjoyment. We can certainly a curious and piggy Aidra fox teaching how well it can pass a woman without a man always helps.
from random video on mzansu.porn/xvideos 4th result on first page for "sex videos" with all the "quality filters" and smart AI algos... makes one wonder how the fuck can shit like this end up so high in serps |
Quote:
i can not see even ONE result from this domain with a clean and private browser. maybe you are too often on this domain that google is thinking you like it. have you ever heard of individual search results? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
or more than alexa what shows me that this page have only users from the third world? https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mzansi.porn and what should be odd on this site? it is a page like million others but he have done his homework. he is more or less good in onpage optimizing and he is smart how to push the site with external links. so what is wrong ? i would not say he is the best in optimizing but he is better than 99% of the rest. so what ? |
Quote:
First you were all about google smartness and hardcore reviewers regarding "single page index" and now you're calling THIS site better than 99% of the rest. Hate to burst your bubble but that site features auto generated text (google got a lot to say about it in it's guidelines) as well as totally unrelated thousands of links, gathered over a very short time frame. Site SCREAMS with easily detectable blackhat tactics. So, pretty please, finish the argument with yourself before starting one with me. |
Quote:
the text helps google a bit to identify the content around you clown. at the end of the day the result depends on the users behaviour. and if this guy is able to satisfy them better as you can - you should blame yourself and not google. donīt worry - i will not tell you what he is doing right and what he is doing wrong - because as an expert as you seems to be you will easily find it by yourself and go to top positions with a finger snap or with help from semrush (same all the other million semrush users who are sharing the first google position) so WHY are you complaining ???? you MUST be already number one in all big keys. or are you not ? |
Google is a wild animal and you will never understand and will never tame this "beast".
Don't rely on a search engine ranking to make money. Don't think outside the square. The best thinking is when you don't even think acknowledge there is a fucking square. But to add to this conversation more directly, even some "brilliant" SEO people online are dumbfounded by currently update(s). I think we should all wait and see where the dust settles. |
FIDDY Google experts!
Quote:
Selling traffic is one thing, and one way to view Google. But trying to sell an actual PRODUCT, or membership, via Google is an entirely different thing. What do I mean? Free is free and paid is paid, so the traffic Google sends in mass numbers to free sites is NOT the same kind of traffic Google sends to smaller niche sites (like paysites). These traffic brokers are math idiot savants (and some without the savant part) who reduces everything down to a mathematical equation. It's like with baseball and saber metrics. LOL But when your own eyes (and experience) tell you different ALWAYS go with that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I do hope you managed to pull in some new sales on your site from acting out as smartass here. Quote:
Judging by your insights on the matter, those millions are probably in BAHT currency. |
Quote:
canīt you read what i wrote ??? i wrote A USER is not interessted in the txte Google is. a user will not even read the text he will watch the video. Quote:
thatīs good because i donīt see that you would understand it anyway. Quote:
if you donīt like people who are telling you the truth in such a sensitive way how your mother powdered your ass than you are not born for this biz. Quote:
i know that you arenīt and you will never because you think the planet have to spin around you and you know all. but IF you would have the smallest clue you would not need to complain - you would UNDERSTAND what others are doing better as you do. you call google editors "trained chimps" and i really doubt that you was reading a 150 pages document in such a short time. if you would read and UNDESTAND it you would probably know what is going on and that is is just logic. Quote:
but i hate to hear so many people crying just because they do not understand the job they are doing and better blame whoever for the own incompetence. i do this job for 21 year and i did also start as an idiot. but i used this 21 years to learn it. thatīs why i do not have to cry. but if you prefer to suffer - do it. but please do not try to force me to be quiet when you write here a a bunch of nonsense because i assume that there are still a few who want to hear other views and other options. and I think they prefer to hear it from someone who can make money and not from a crying baby. |
Quote:
i did that probably longer than you and had with ONE SINGE memebrsite more members as you ever had with your whole network. why do you clowns think i am stupid and donīt know this perspective ??? Quote:
what is the site google should rank ? with WICH affiliate ID ???? and do you know WHY google send them to free sites? 1. because they SEARCH for it 2. they are much more popular. Quote:
i donīt know who told you guys ever you are smart. 90% of the members of this forum are kids and not people who are able to afford good life with what they do. there are people here making 20 or 30 k per year and this people want to tell me how this biz works ??? people who call themself SEO who can not even optimize their own sites ??? i really can not read this bullshit anymore. and i am tired to read all that cries from losers who are thinking that they only have to cry long and loud enough and mum will buy them a sweetie. people who THINK SERIOUSLY they can find here the helpers to destroy google and everyone else who thinks more professional then them. you guys kill my mood. i better enjoy my time in my world as to read so much bullshit. |
Quote:
Users will click on anything if it's served on top spots, regardless of it's quality. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Why I'm even mentioning that site - because it defies logic that website can elude so many quality checks and filters and be served up so high. That is all I ever said :) Quote:
I've read the reviewer info back when it was released, some months ago. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Given that tiny pool of what "the porn biz" has become it's not surprising you (along with many others) would have a myopic view. You are all exploiting what few revenue sources are left in the world of free. I get it. But, like stock brokers who simply push paper around, you do not create anything. You simply take traffic from Source A and sell it to Source B. Wow, genius level stuff. But do not worry. Google is a giant corporation, like the corporations that mostly buy your traffic, so in the end the few players you play with will win. Hopefully by then I will be retired on a beach somewhere. :) |
Quote:
|
For a couple of weeks until Easter I was suddenly getting ridiculous amounts of Google traffic for wordpress tags, while the actual homepages were ignored. The last week it's slowly been going down, and yesterday there was a sudden big drop :(
BTW, do you think Google has different algorithms for adult? I mean actual 'quality' criteria algorithms and not just in trying to prevent adult results coming up in non-adult searches (which it appears to be doing heavy handedly these days). |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123