I struck a nerve with a gfy white supremist. Good.

Sure they do

only white supremacists think that.

Help me understand please..

So.. corruption of black government in SAR is causing white people to lose land and confirmed stats say they are also a lot of killing going on on farms. (new york times wrote about it, that isn't alt right news).

Helping those white farmers would be white supremacy, just because they need rescue from black people?

trump doesn't give 1 single shit about white farmers in safrica.

he made that tweet to be divisive and rile up his white supremist base. I'm speaking to that fact and that known white supremists applauded that tweet.

Still trying to figure out your leftist train of thought..... bare with me please

So.. people are dying and their property is being taken, but Trump SHOULD NOT mention that because since it is black vs white conflict, white supremacists will like it and therefore it will cause division?

If so, it once again leads me to the question - shouldn't ALL people like the fact that people in desperate need are being helped?

Would it be divisive if it was whites starting up apartheid again and he wants to help the blacks remain equal?

Seems to me like ANYTHING can be considered as divisive.

I'm not shocked a white supremist fails to grasp a liberal viewpoint.

Help me grasp it, please.

Yeah, i fail to see why trump would care about this... thats south africas local problem... blacks here aint going to do that. They aint native here or get they farmland stolen here. They were systematically not allowed to own much of anything here. They were kidnapped, enslaved for generations then stuffed into the unwanted places here... now those unwanted places are wanted and theyre getting stuffed into the outskirts. Totally different situation. Plus, if trump showed interest in this, it would raise awareness here... which cletus, norm and billy-mae dont want...

>Blacks take back their farmland from whites in Africa - Trump does nothing
Trump must send back for them Obama :1orglaugh

well, for starters,

1. safrica is NOT seizing land

2. no white land owners are dying because their land is being seized, because there is no land being seized.

these are things "normal" people understand while white supremists get confused about them.

1. sorry but it is happening, you have countless explanations of the SAR land expropriation and redistribution, with a lot of corruption (feel free to google it, so you don't accuse me of giving you an alt right article about it - try Reuters perhaps, or pick your own credible source)

2. you even have wikipedia page with farm attack statistics (designated page just for farm attacks in SAR)

3. you have a personal story from a fellow gfy webmaster about his family losing land in SAR (first page of this thread, Paul Matthews)

Help me, "unconfuse" me - where do you get the info that all is well in SAR ?

reality:

"In short — we have no clear idea about the murder rate on South African farms, and because of that, the claim being made by protesters about farmers being more likely to be murdered is not supported by reliable data."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-41807642


the anti-defamation league agrees with me:

"It is extremely disturbing that the President of the United States echoed a longstanding and false white supremacist claim that South Africa's white farmers are targets of large-scale, racially motivated killings by South Africa's black majority," the anti-hate advocacy organization said, noting that prominent white supremacists such as Richard Spencer have espoused the claim.

"We would hope that the President would try to understand the facts and realities of the situation in South Africa, rather than repeat disturbing, racially divisive talking points used most frequently by white supremacists."

the Southern Poverty Law center agrees with me:

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that tracks hate crimes, also identified the claim as "a lodestar for white supremacist groups at home and abroad."

Should the 3rd word pay reparations to thewhite man for not being in salvery any more? How dare those colored people askfor freedom and their own land back? Makes me mad as fuck! Dont they know how much whipping the white man had to do to force the blacks to build absolutely evefything? Whipping is exhausting work...IMO the white slave owner should get new whips and deep tissue shoulder massagefrom the blacks because the white man did all the work! He even got the nickname cracker from the sound of his whip...a testament to his hard work forsure

you dumbfuck, that's not the etymology of the word "cracker".

you'll make up anything just to spew your hate.

I cant lie, I thought that's where cracker came from too...

Berkelelelely 🤣

The term could have also derived from the Middle English cnac, craic, or crak, which originally meant the sound of a cracking whip but came to refer to "loud conversation, bragging talk".[5]

History according to the white man:

Whites lived in south africa first because ?!?!? and the are not called crackers because of their whipping but because ?!?!?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

All has been explained LOL

Didn't we all come from Africa?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally yes...but claiming south africa had no black when the invaders came is hillarious...this whole thing is hilarious...it is a lesson that you should arm the fuck up or ypu will become a victim of white history...

you fail at understanding simple words like "could have".

since you need things dumbed down for you via wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craic


craic never once meant whip.

dumbfuck.

no. there was no single origin of humans.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...ientists-find/

https://medium.com/@johnhawks/the-st...d-9e435bea24f6

I obviously quoted wiki on that and so did you LOL write a letter to them and explain how brainy you are...

Anyway, I am sure the word cracker has nothing to do with his favorite tool, the whip, but is obviously unrelated and that whit man examined the meaning and was honest and did not lie and found it was because of biscuits LOL

Now that I think about it, the word CRACK sounds nothing like a whip at all LOL


Prepare for more white man historytommorow when the white man explains how the brave founding fathers actually helped the natives and kept them in protective camps! Oh and he did not murder them all, nooooooo, it was measels! AHahahaha!

White = right

My point was that at different times in history different races and cultures dominated others.

that serb gibberish is as nonsensical as serb fake btc trades posts.

my point was providing current scientific research on the origins of humans, which is clearly what your first post was about.

That would be a topic for another thread I think.

No you simply lack the prerequisite intelligence to follow my BTC posts and understand what I did...give my post to an experienced trader who can read a chart and watch his reaction...

Berkelelely cant even follow simple simple trades LOL

I agree. there's a lot of new research coming out on it. I had thought your question pertained.

what we know for certain is you've stated you trade virtual btc and you have no idea about the meaning of words you use.

Yes I told you multiple times the trades posted were a demo to clearly and without any doubt demonstrate that I am a trade god...I posted my moves a day in advance and nobody disputed a single trade because: they could not LOL your stoner brain is incapable of understanding this...

My real life trades are better than the dumbed down examples that you failed to follow...let me knowwhen you make more money than my joke trades hahahahaha

So to sum it up; immigration = bad :thumbsup

This single mandible explains the boers being in SA before the blacks...good work bro

those bombs NATO dropped on serbiaville landed closer to you than I previously realized.

Why would Trump do anything, America isn't the World Police

The Boers were indeed in South Africa before the blacks. That link addresses your out of Africa theory.

Why did Trump bomb Syria after Putin gassed the babies?

Why did Trump threaten North Korea with destruction if they kept shooting missiles?