Funny thing about that.. Go look at her tweet.. Senate Judiciary trolled her with a link to where to file the request. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Why not just leak it? Nothing to lose at this point right?

So this is confusing to me.

First I said that BK had no evidence of a conspiracy against him, then you said there was evidence - in the FBI report - which is why, you claimed, Feinstein wanted it sealed. But Mitch McConnell also wants it sealed. And Pelosi wants it released. And no republicans who have read the report have said anything about a conspiracy.

So the point stands - BK has no evidence of a criminal conspiracy against him, but he still said that in his testimony.

The man knows what he did or didn't do.. If he knows he didn't do what he's being accused of then it's pretty easy for himself to conclude there's a conspiracy to smear him.......

Why are her lawyers as well as Feinstein refusing to turn over communications and "evidence?" Why is Grassley asking about communications between the accusers? Because he already knows.. He's not asking questions he doesn't already know the answer to..

No, a federal judge should not immediately jump to partisan conspiracy as an explanation for a false sexual assault claim (assuming it was indeed false). He could have said that Ford was miss-identifying her attackers, or even that he believed she wasn't telling the truth. Instead, here's what he said:

"This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups"

He's making a very specific claim, that Ford is only alleging the assault because of partisan anger and conspiracy. This is unacceptable for any judge to claim without evidence.

Because that's EXACTLY what it was? She very likely did either knowingly or unknowingly misidentify Kavanaugh considering 1. Someone else confessed along with witness corroboration and 2. that person has likely already been made public but the story got shut down...

I don't know anymore man. You're claiming more unsourced left-wing conspiracies than I can even keep track of.

Congressional record. "Garrett" was outed over the weekend.. This "mysterious" man came forward Monday. Another unnamed man backs up his claim (likely Judge) .. Judge and Garrett are good friends to this day.. Garrett and Kavanaugh could be twins. Garrett lived in a house exactly as described in a location exactly as described.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoEWSDDUUAMIehL.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoEWe-DV4AAZhKB.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoEWu_dUwAASuvo.jpg


That story breaking out would have killed it right then.. So they doubled, even tripled down with more false claims hoping that would cover their ass.

#metoo will result in that if you tried to kiss a girl when you where 12 and she turned away, that there is a change you could and up as a #metoo victim and being accused of rape 30,40,50 years later.

wasn't there a saying 'no means yes' :)

Even in Holland some people wrote that it all was a democratic campaign where they don't fear to use false testimonials. All is accepted as long as it is against Trump.