GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   LOL: BUSH says: They don't appreciate women (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=500030)

baddog 08-04-2005 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
:Oh crap


not you :)

Joe Citizen 08-04-2005 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
It's not my job to educate you about the beginings of World War II. Suffice it to say the Germans were not a larger, better equipped force that steam rolled the little old French. The French were at least as strong as the Germans.

Facts:

1. As of May 1940, 136 German divisions were in the west, as opposed to 94 French divisions in northeastern and northern France.
2. Tank forces essentially equal.
3. In aircraft the Germans enjoyed advantage in over-all numbers, with about 3,200 planes to 1,200 French. The French were particularly inferior in anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons.

So yes, the French were outnumbered but all the above is essentially meaningless anyway because you missed my point in the first place. France, like Belgium and Poland being neighbours (i.e sharing a land border) with Germany bore the initial brunt of the fresh German war machine.

So geography played a large part in their defeat. That was my point but you were so blinded by your hatred of all things French you were incapable of seeing it.

WarChild 08-04-2005 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
Facts:

1. As of May 1940, 136 German divisions were in the west, as opposed to 94 French divisions in northeastern and northern France.
2. Tank forces essentially equal.
3. In aircraft the Germans enjoyed advantage in over-all numbers, with about 3,200 planes to 1,200 French. The French were particularly inferior in anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons.

So yes, the French were outnumbered but all the above is essentially meaningless anyway because you missed my point in the first place. France, like Belgium and Poland being neighbours (i.e sharing a land border) with Germany bore the initial brunt of the fresh German war machine.

So geography played a large part in their defeat. That was my point but you were so blinded by your hated of all things French you were incapable of seeing it.

I don't hate the French, I just think it's funny that they're the World's bitches. :thumbsup

Joe Citizen 08-04-2005 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
I don't hate the French, I just think it's funny that they're the World's bitches. :thumbsup

In your opinion. Whatever makes you feel better.

Hell, the USA got owned by Vietnam... and that was a third world country. :1orglaugh

Edit: Gee, maybe I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and call them 'developing'. :1orglaugh

WarChild 08-04-2005 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
In your opinion. Whatever makes you feel better.

Hell, the USA got owned by Vietnam... and that was a third world country. :1orglaugh

I'm not American, why would I care?

Last I checked far more Vietnamese died in that war than Americans. Was there ever a single battle in America? Sure, America had to run off from that "police action" but you seriously think the Vietnamese "owned" them? Wow.

Joe Citizen 08-04-2005 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
I'm not American, why would I care?

Just goes to show you that ownage does have a lot to do with geography.

The only reason Canada hasn't gotten owned yet is geography.

WarChild 08-05-2005 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
Just goes to show you that ownage does have a lot to do with geography.

The only reason Canada hasn't gotten owned yet is geography.

Canada's never lost a war, police action or otherwise. Never surrendered either.

Joe Citizen 08-05-2005 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
Canada's never lost a war, police action or otherwise. Never surrendered either.

That's because you've never been invaded, dummy :1orglaugh

Just don't get it, do you?

WarChild 08-05-2005 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
That's because you've never been invaded, dummy :1orglaugh

Just don't get it, do you?

Wait a second. You have to be invaded to lose now? So America won in Vietnam after all? I can't keep track of your position on this.

Joe Citizen 08-05-2005 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
Wait a second. You have to be invaded to lose now? So America won in Vietnam after all? I can't keep track of your position on this.

Boy are you dumb.

I'm saying the reason you haven't lost is you haven't been invaded. Hell, Australia could probably invade Canada and win. :1orglaugh

WarChild 08-05-2005 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
Boy are you dumb.

I'm saying the reason you haven't lost is you haven't been invaded. Hell, Australia could probably invade Canada and win. :1orglaugh

You should come invade Canada. That'd be awfully cute.

WarChild 08-05-2005 12:09 AM

Let me try to sort this all out.

Every country that gets invaded gets defeated? Except for Vietnam, which managed to stave off both French and America. So Vietnam is the big kid on the block now because they're the only country that can stand up to an invasion? I'm really confused.

Joe Citizen 08-05-2005 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
Let me try to sort this all out.

Every country that gets invaded gets defeated? Except for Vietnam, which managed to stave off both French and America. So Vietnam is the big kid on the block now because they're the only country that can stand up to an invasion? I'm really confused.

I'm sorry but I can't help you. I think you have reading comprehension diffilculties.

Either that or you're just plain dumb. :1orglaugh

WarChild 08-05-2005 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
I'm sorry but I can't help you. I think you have reading comprehension diffilculties.

Either that or you're just plain dumb. :1orglaugh

You kangaroo humpers are so cute.

Joe Citizen 08-05-2005 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
You kangaroo humpers are so cute.

It's true we are.

Everyone loves Australia.

directfiesta 08-05-2005 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

Rich and Directfiesta are great examples. You ever hear either of these two bring up a problem in Canada?

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...ghlight=Quebec

I stop now ... I think that is more than one...

:321GFY

Cassie 08-05-2005 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Idiot ... Iraq was the most open society to women ...
Now it became like that, thanks to you.

PS: when did women obtain the right to vote in the USA ????

1920 thanks to alice paul.

mardigras 08-05-2005 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
probably a lie ... didn't hear that on FUCKS NEWS

They're too busy bringing us no news from Aruba :glugglug

nico-t 08-05-2005 07:20 AM

everybody defending bush or al queada is retarded as fuck. The leaders of both parties are equally fucked up in their heads. Plus they are both religion extremists. When two people or two groups have so many things in common, their interests are also the same and they clash. Thats whats happening with bush and bin.

12clicks 08-05-2005 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t
everybody defending bush or al queada is retarded as fuck. The leaders of both parties are equally fucked up in their heads. Plus they are both religion extremists. When two people or two groups have so many things in common, their interests are also the same and they clash. Thats whats happening with bush and bin.

Paste is not for eating, its for art class.

billywatson 08-05-2005 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Dickovitch
In Iraq under Saddam, if you are a woman, you could face:

Beheading. Under the pretext of fighting prostitution, units of "Fedayeen Saddam," the paramilitary organization led by Uday Hussein, Saddam's eldest son, have beheaded in public more than 200 women throughout the country, dumping their severed heads at their families' doorsteps. Many families have been required to display the victim's head on their outside fences for several days. These barbaric acts were carried out in the total absence of any proper judicial procedures and many of the victims were not engaged in prostitution, but were targeted for political reasons. For example, Najat Mohammad Haydar, an obstetrician in Baghdad, was beheaded after criticizing the corruption within health services. (Amnesty International Report, Iraq: Systematic Torture of Political Prisoners, August 2001; Iraqi Women's League in Damascus, Syria)

Rape. The Iraqi Government uses rape and sexual assault of women to achieve the following goals: to extract information and forced confessions from detained family members; to intimidate Iraqi oppositionists by sending videotapes showing the rape of female family members; and to blackmail Iraqi men into future cooperation with the regime. Some Iraqi authorities even carry personnel cards identifying their official "activity" as the "violation of women's honor." (U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices-2001, March 2002; Iraq Research and Documentation Project, Harvard University)


Torture. The Iraqi Government routinely tortures and kills female dissidents and the female relatives of Iraqi oppositionists and defectors. Victims include Safiyah Hassan, the mother of two Iraqi defectors, who was killed after publicly criticizing the Iraqi Government for killing her sons after their return to Iraq. Women in Saddam's jails are subjected to the following forms of torture: brutal beatings, systematic rape, electrical shocks, and branding. (U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices-2001, March 2002; U.S. Department of State, Iraq: A Population Silenced, December 2002)



Murder. In 1990, Saddam Hussein introduced Article 111 into the Iraqi Penal Code in a calculated effort to strengthen tribal support for his regime. This law exempts men who kill their female relatives in defense of their family's honor from prosecution and punishment. The UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women reported that more than 4,000 women have been victims of so-called "honor killings" since Article 111 went into effect. (UN Commission on Human Rights, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, January 2002)


Why did you exclude ALL OTHER Islamic nations?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123