GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   New 2257 regulations are out (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=876149)

Rique 12-17-2008 04:52 PM

Just subscribed to the newsletter, thanks. 4pm bumb.

d-null 12-17-2008 05:10 PM

so do we need to watermark everything with a 2257 notice?

V_RocKs 12-17-2008 05:11 PM

Word up....

Rique 12-17-2008 06:05 PM

Just in case anyone is interested, and has time to read thru 169 pages of mumbo jumbo, here is the link to the 169-page PDF document, straight from the Federal Register, LINK.

ZEI2257 12-17-2008 07:37 PM

If you need help getting organized? Don?t forget to check out 2257 Record-Keeping software. Just click on the sig :thumbsup

DWB 12-17-2008 07:39 PM

At least it's protecting kids, right? LOL

One moronic policy after another. Looking forward to what they want now for US citizens shooting abroad. If a government issued ID is not good enough anymore, fuck 'em, I guess I'll have to sell my company to a local and retire.

NaughtyRob 12-17-2008 07:42 PM

Thanks for that pdf gonna read it tonight.

stickyfingerz 12-17-2008 08:05 PM

I see this not coming to fruition, or being struck down again. :2 cents:

d-null 12-17-2008 08:14 PM

if there is any enforcement, hopefully they go after and shut down the theft sites first with all of their free porn, but I wonder if those sites will actually be exempt from punishment under some kind of "user uploaded" clause :helpme

Johnny G 12-17-2008 08:16 PM

Thanks for the great info Joe. As usual I look forward to your seminar at Internext.

tony286 12-17-2008 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15211201)
if there is any enforcement, hopefully they go after and shut down the theft sites first with all of their free porn, but I wonder if those sites will actually be exempt from punishment under some kind of "user uploaded" clause :helpme

I think since they are not in the us nothing is going to happen to them either way.

Ethersync 12-17-2008 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 15210338)
9am? WTF yo?

Zzzzzzz

:1orglaugh

NaughtyRob 12-18-2008 12:26 AM

Shouldnt this be a sticky or nobody cares anymore?

d-null 12-18-2008 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15211208)
I think since they are not in the us nothing is going to happen to them either way.

most of the big ones, yes, but there are many that are in the u.s.

Nikki_Licks 12-18-2008 07:02 AM

Thanks for posting this, Joe.

Early morning bump....:winkwink:

JP513 12-18-2008 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GetNaughty (Post 15211962)
Shouldnt this be a sticky or nobody cares anymore?

My sentiments exactly.

tony286 12-18-2008 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GetNaughty (Post 15211962)
Shouldnt this be a sticky or nobody cares anymore?

there was a time this would of been on top for days. its sad.

MrPinks 12-18-2008 09:38 AM

Keep this on top for more info :thumbsup

MrPinks 12-18-2008 09:42 AM

Link doesn't work.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rique (Post 15210819)
Just in case anyone is interested, and has time to read thru 169 pages of mumbo jumbo, here is the link to the 169-page PDF document, straight from the Federal Register, LINK.


MandyBlake 12-18-2008 11:08 AM

here's a bump

lesbodojo 12-18-2008 11:18 AM

Thanks for the info!

MaDalton 12-18-2008 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM (Post 15210338)
9am? WTF yo?

Zzzzzzz

i also wonder who always puts the important seminars at times where it is absolutely 150% impossible for me to attend. and probably 99% of all others too :disgust :Oh crap

BFT3K 12-18-2008 01:30 PM

I would like to see the govt mandate that ALL tube site owners have to maintain 2257 records for ALL scenes on their sites.

Give them the same clerical obligations that those of us who actually produce the content have to legally adhere to, and then we can finally be rid of them for good!

I am sure there are plenty of tube sites running on US servers now, so let's even the playing field a bit okay?

starpimps 12-18-2008 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 15213585)
i also wonder who always puts the important seminars at times where it is absolutely 150% impossible for me to attend. and probably 99% of all others too :disgust :Oh crap

cause from 11am on its time for getting wasted :)

OldJeff 12-18-2008 02:34 PM

Anyone have the PDF, aparently the federal register can not handle GFY bandwidth and the took it down

TisMe 12-18-2008 02:57 PM

New links.

Text version: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29677.htm

PDF: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-29677.pdf

KillerK 12-18-2008 03:11 PM

bump back up

spacedog 12-18-2008 03:17 PM

wow.. so every image must have custodian info and date of production in the digital file of the image..

How many of these already have that in there? If I have content from so & so sponsor and it has this info and I crop and resize, is it still in there?

BFT3K 12-18-2008 06:30 PM

Bump back to the front.

TTiger 12-18-2008 06:35 PM

thank you dude

TheKandybar 12-18-2008 06:56 PM

good work
 
and it's only going to get more interesting post Eric Holder's appointment.

Redrob 12-18-2008 07:56 PM

Looks like cam sites are going to be required to record some of each individual person in each stream. This will be huge for some sites.

stickyfingerz 12-18-2008 07:59 PM

Pretty sad it took a swingers publication to get 2257 pretty much killed, and our whole industry couldn't do shit. Now they are trying again, so what are all the adult industry attorneys and umm organizations meant to stop this crap doing exactly other than reporting what "is" going to happen?

DWB 12-18-2008 08:08 PM

Wow, this is still not a sticky?

One more reason the industry is doomed. People just don't give a shit.

tony286 12-18-2008 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 15215646)
Pretty sad it took a swingers publication to get 2257 pretty much killed, and our whole industry couldn't do shit. Now they are trying again, so what are all the adult industry attorneys and umm organizations meant to stop this crap doing exactly other than reporting what "is" going to happen?

Also there is nothing about this on the FSC site last time I looked earlier today. They should be all over this.

GatorB 12-18-2008 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 15214138)
I would like to see the govt mandate that ALL tube site owners have to maintain 2257 records for ALL scenes on their sites.

Give them the same clerical obligations that those of us who actually produce the content have to legally adhere to, and then we can finally be rid of them for good!

I am sure there are plenty of tube sites running on US servers now, so let's even the playing field a bit okay?

And then they'll just move their sites to non-US servers.

stickyfingerz 12-18-2008 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15215671)
Also there is nothing about this on the FSC site last time I looked earlier today. They should be all over this.

Should of had some sort of lawyer shit going on to stop it from ever happening. How does 2257 get struck down as unconstitutional by the sixth court, and they can just revise a few things and push it through without it going again before the court that struck it down? Reaks of bs to me.

tony286 12-18-2008 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 15215702)
Should of had some sort of lawyer shit going on to stop it from ever happening. How does 2257 get struck down as unconstitutional by the sixth court, and they can just revise a few things and push it through without it going again before the court that struck it down? Reaks of bs to me.

yeah my wife was just reading to be the whole certification thing to me. Its not clear, I they would write these things in simple english.

DWB 12-18-2008 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15215671)
Also there is nothing about this on the FSC site last time I looked earlier today. They should be all over this.

All over it like they were the last time? The only thing I saw them all over was them asking for more money and members. They were not able to do anything in the last round of 2257, what makes you think they can do anything now?

It took a small swingers group in Ohio to defeat what all the industry funds poured into the FSC could not. That's sad.

This is MAJOR news and it's not even on their site yet? :helpme

stickyfingerz 12-18-2008 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 15215728)
All over it like they were the last time? The only thing I saw them all over was them asking for more money and members. They were not able to do anything in the last round of 2257, what makes you think they can do anything now?

It took a small swingers group in Ohio to defeat what all the industry funds poured into the FSC could not. That's sad.

This is MAJOR news and it's not even on their site yet? :helpme

Yup same as what I was saying above. How is a law that is struck down for whatever reason just revised and bang its a law again? :disgust


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123