Originally Posted by WebCompanyInc (Post 16361468)

WRONG. I am far from being Princeton Cash. I have worked for many times. I am just a guy who sees a thread where some ass clown posted the name of an adult program in his thread title in an effort to hurt that program.

And when the program owner stepped up to defend his company, he was banned. That is what I see IMHO.

What should any program owner do if some ass clown tries to hurt their business?

The ass clown should have been banned. Not the program owner.

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16328359)

You all know I am not a fan of his, but there is only toplessness on that tour, and unless she is using toys, or doing spreads, sexual simulations inside the members area 2257 really isn't necessary, but is good to have.

"Under a federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 2257, producers of a "visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct" are required to keep records showing the ages of the models. It does not cover images produced before July 3, 1995, or depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct."

Bash away for other reasons, but that isn't a good reason to bash.

Originally Posted by WebCompanyInc (Post 16361468)

WRONG. I am far from being Princeton Cash. I have worked for many times. I am just a guy who sees a thread where some ass clown posted the name of an adult program in his thread title in an effort to hurt that program.

And when the program owner stepped up to defend his company, he was banned. That is what I see IMHO.

What should any program owner do if some ass clown tries to hurt their business?

The ass clown should have been banned. Not the program owner.

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 16361496)

dont worry, if you are princeton/andre/pussyserver, i will push you until you have a meltdown and get yourself banned again... :thumbsup

if you are really not the above, i dont fucking like you either... :2 cents:

Originally Posted by WebCompanyInc (Post 16361468)

WRONG. I am far from being Princeton Cash. I have worked for many times. I am just a guy who sees a thread where some ass clown posted the name of an adult program in his thread title in an effort to hurt that program.

And when the program owner stepped up to defend his company, he was banned. That is what I see IMHO.

What should any program owner do if some ass clown tries to hurt their business?

The ass clown should have been banned. Not the program owner.

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 16328341)

let me finish bashing andre for a few more days and then you can have it again for the same thing as last time.. a donation to the humane society..

i dont want to give you a bad reputation, so i'll have to clean up my behavior a bit.... :thumbsup

Originally Posted by WebCompanyInc (Post 16361468)

WRONG. I am far from being Princeton Cash. I have worked for many times. I am just a guy who sees a thread where some ass clown posted the name of an adult program in his thread title in an effort to hurt that program.

And when the program owner stepped up to defend his company, he was banned. That is what I see IMHO.

What should any program owner do if some ass clown tries to hurt their business?

The ass clown should have been banned. Not the program owner.