http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/DMCA/

would be interesting to see what might happen if someone told Rush Limbaugh that "democratic legislation" was making it EASY for unscrupulous, bad, dirty icky pornographers to give away FOR FREE..... THAT ANYONE CAN ACCESS EASILY..........ANYONE! material that has absolutely NO CONTROLS like a little thing call US Title18 Article 2257


Im just sayin, I wonder what would happen:question

spaz

maybe buy some spots on BROtube http://brotube.com

Anyone having their takedown notices ignored may now sue the hosting provider for damages.

They don't ignore the notices, they remove the content when they are notified. But with literally thousands of tubes it is impossible to stop the dilution of contents value for anyone's sites


spaz

They can't. That would be acknowledging copyright infringement.

They are a few steps ahead of you.

sounds like extortion

Exactly..... that quote u posted above about the Louis Vuitton is what comes to mind every time I see these threads.... why hasn't anyone (content producers/sponsors) put a freaking lawsuit against that US based host? WTF? All I read in this board are complaint threads (not talking specifically about Tom's case) but haven't read anything about anyone taking action...... kinda like DMCA is as far as they are willing to go..... well not that I have any stake on the whole thing as I don't promote general niches but still.... sad 2 see these thiefs getting away with what they are doing and even more so ... thinking that they can steal content from sponsors and then sell ad space right back to them as if nothing ever happened...... kinda like that ass smothie thing.....yet no sponsor that I have heard of as of yet is willing to go as far as Louis Vouitton has to protect their intellectual property ........

I might be wrong about how many sponsors are taking action beyond DMCAs but heck....the whole impression I get is that no one gives a fuck as I still see those big tubes getting bigger and more robust with 20min + full length scenes...

WOW! That is just Sad. I still don't see how they are getting away with this.

See qxm's post above.

Stop being a pussy and go after them

Calling out 50 thieves...

Ask Eric or Playboy/RealityCash/Adult.com/GFY if they care... :upsidedow

Thanks for speaking up 3xTom! :thumbsup

Maybe it's time for someone to set up a tube site which only links to Brazzers and Playboy/RealityCash/Adult.com, and other known content theft sites/enablers/contributary offenders vids, with "user submitted" videos.

That's called adapting, right? :error

What's good for the goose... :winkwink:

ADG

Try katz, claudia is listed there... along with just about anything else.

I don't know what katz is :) Feel free to icq it to me so more people that might not know what it is won't discover it as well.

katzporn.com

where the fuck did this industry go ?

sue them in small claims court for not paying your license fees.

it's not millions lost - it's hundreds or thousands.

a typical non exclusive license for one video like that is $50 to $100 - 6 videos about $300 to $500
be reasonable in your charges - and within what others in the market are charging

now imagine if they had to send a lawyer to EVERY small claims trial on non payment of licence fees....in 100 different states and countries


if you win and they dont' pay - seize assets to pay the bill - have the URL seized and sold at auction to pay your debt.

if you loose - they can't sue for more than $100 in legal for small claims in most areas- cost them several thousand or more to fight it.

if they don't show up - you win

so SUE - it's what $35 for small claims court filing fees.................you don't need a lawyer

don't you know? rogue uploader!!!

:2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:Oh crap

Hum.... Wondering why noone has answered my question yet?

Awww, Tom, don't be a crybaby, honey. The somebodies are doing real business in Amsterdam right now. I'm sure they will get back to you as soon as they can.

HAHAHHA Awesome Selena...

Ya know the question is quite simple

Can I Buy Ad Space On MY STOLEN Content..???

You would think someone could poke their head in and either say yes or no?

I agree shemp 100% Thats why you will see nothing but ADAPT out of my camp over the coming months.... The kind of ADAPTION that will make all the affiliates some decent money again...

We don't offer advertising on specific videos (which I took the liberty to remove)

Do you have any content, have you ever made a take down notice?
Don't talk about something you have no clue.


As for Robbie... 3 POPS ? :D
Impossible, pornhub has 1 pop per day per IP and not through trafficjunky.

Trafficjunky currently only sells banner placement on-page

Thanks, saved me from sending a DMCA which I had started until I read your reply.

This one is still live - http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=832550271

First off thanks for replying and being honest with that answer as well as removing my content from pornhub...

But so I am clear on it

Basically If i buy ad space then for lets just say Raven Riley since that was what it started out asking for... Then my Raven Riley banner could be shown on lets take for instance this stolen video from Kates Playground

http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.ph...960eb8366bc118 ??

Is that correct? or am I missing something here?

give a mainstream landing page a try. probably work better than a paysite.

Also note:

Im not ONLY trying to be a little bit of a dick here :1orglaugh but I'm also trying to understand the advertising you guys are selling a little better..

I mean if My Raven Riley banner was shown on Kates STOLEN video I dont see getting any joins or monetizing that banner very well... If my banner was going to be shown on THAT video i would want to be advertising katesplayground.com Not RavenRiley.com ...

If I found a "NON STOLEN video" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
of a girl using a vibrating finger toy I would want to advertise a vibrating finger toy for sale NOT Raven Riley...

Just seems to me that monetizing my advertising dollars would be better spent doing it that way and not just posting a banner ad for something that is totally irrelevant to the content that you are displaying...

Do you own Kates Playground ? If not, get the owner to ask for his video removed... And to answer your question, next to the video ads appear on every videos.

You will be please to hear that we will have niche/search term targetted advertising in the upcoming month... so you will be able to bid on let's say anal videos with anal sites and so on...etc

So your search will let me search for terms like "stolen video of raven riley" and then I can advertise or tom can for that site? sweet I am sure tom cant wait to monetize off his own stolen content.

can you add a feature as well so when your "users" are uploading content they can also get passwords to other sites just as a bonus for free?

You'll have to OUTBID the others who want to profit off your stolen content:winkwink:

are their any videos which you do own the rights to show?

seems like its ok until you get caught.

so basically i can have my banner on the same page as content you have stolen, so the money you earn from selling the spot is blantly ripping off the people who shot the content, and have no regard for other peoples work.

if your conversions are so good why dont you buy your content, but then again thats why you are selling ad spots, if it was so great would you really be selling them?

$100 pps days vs selling an ad spot, the payout would be much more compared to the money made on the ad spot.

man profiting from illegal items is very much against the law in canada btw. illegal gains from crime / fraud / misrepresentation is sooo what your doing...

you may just sell the ads, but your turning a profit from illegal items.. I may just have a road trip out to montreal soon :)

i think traffic junky is some kind of affiliate rep reality show where they give reps the most hostile potential customers ever to sell to and see how long they last.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
That answer is just so WRONG!


spaz

That was soooooooooo kind of you to remove our stolen videos.

Now, you'll have to forgive me, because I am just a ditzy affiliate manager, but I am a little confused.

When I go to pornhub.com and do a search for Raven Riley, I see that the videos are indeed gone. I can also see some information on them, which shows that they have received a total of 2,511,693 hits. Most were uploaded 1 year ago, with one from 4 months ago, and one from 3 months ago.

You'll have to excuse me, but here is where dizty me gets confused. A year ago, Pornhub posted this your site:

http://www.pornhub.com/blog/23

Now, what puzzled me about that is that you publicly announced that you were putting this approval process into place. If I read it right, your process would only allow users to upload vids that ran under 3 minutes in length, and you'd prefer to be able to give credit to the author.

That's a standup kinda guy process, and I applaud you for it.

But...

until you took the liberty of removing them, how was it that Raven had 2 videos that show posted a year ago that are over 10 minutes in duration?

I guess maybe your process guy didn't realize that they were over 3 minutes, and that it was Raven?

And I know there are such a thing as magic join links, but with your process in place, how did a surfer automagically upload a 10:06 Raven clip 4 months ago?

http://www.xxxkinkypics.com/pornhub2.jpg

Was the guy that handles your process having a bad day? Or was he just so tired from fapping it to stolen content that he overlooked it?

At least 3xTom put up message I have pleasure to read and answer, serious questions...

This long message is just ... borring...We are an ad network, asking us about details on the site we sell advertising on is just like asking you why a certain model put up pink makeup and not purple... you are the affiliate manager, I know you have nothing to do with makeup... I am the ad network, nothing to do with content...