How about you just sell ads on videos that you know they legally own?

Would that not make everything work a lot better?

If you have nothing to do with content, how can you remove it?

So you do not enforce rules and policy about the content on source?

Something is unclear to me Ladies and Gentlemen: why the hell don't the copyright owners SUE The Fuck Out Of PornHub and Similar Crap? Those dudes should get fucked in the ass in the jail ten times per day for a decade with long, curvy, thick and Desert Dry Dongs.

Who will do something? Me the little-fish-gallery-submitter-affiliate fucktard?? :)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

because the DMCA protects them


spaz

wrong answer.. beware sarcastic women

this is just bizarre

Technically by removing it without being served with a dmca he invalidated their dmca protection.. :2 cents:

you nailed it on the head.

all of her posts are like that, borrrring.

The big secret is I sent an email to [email protected] ....

That's interesting. I wasn't aware that an independent 3rd party traffic broker who has nothing to do with content on a site that they sell ads for could request the removal of content that they aren't the owner of.

Then the 1 pop per ip would explain why I couldn't duplicate the pop up.

As far as there being THREE pop ups that I saw...well, I guess that might have come from your inexperience in traffic deals. You guys didn't invent shadiness you know. lol

There's a lot of guys out here who perfected it. :1orglaugh
So if you only do the one popup and I got three...that means that one of your clients is "monetizing the traffic" with popups off his site.

I NEVER linked to sites that did that. But then again I was doing this from the mid 1990's on. And you have only....how did you say it "been in the traffic trenches for 5 years" (whatever that means)

Anyway, that explains the three pop ups and my inability yesterday to duplicate it.

I can't believe that... YOU WIN, next time you find your content on PH, I'll make sure not to interfere with procedures :1orglaugh

ouch..... big ballsy hammer hitting the tiny nail.... waiting for this response...

for those just tuning in... only the content owner can submit a DMCA request, since part of the submission process is you are acknowledging you are the copyright owner, blah, blah, blah.

if you submit a false DMCA report, like if you were the competitor and wanted to have your competitors stuff taken down, submitting a DMCA request would get you into mucho legal trouble.



Fight the truthiness!

Thanks for clarifying your statement that you had nothing to do with content.

Hey thanks for the info. I went and checked it and downloaded some of it. As I suspected it's the small low res over watermarked downloadable version I give my members and not the high quality protected stream.

I'm having all those links removed as we speak.

PornHub removed my content. All of it.

For now :upsidedow

traffic junky = brazzers

they only sell for sites they own

its suppose to be common knowledge

But will it continue to?

According to what was posted above in the thread they will be changing things that will make them able to control/verify the content that is uploaded to the site. If they are doing that then they are no longer just acting as a host and doesn't that then make them no longer able to hide behind the DMCA safe harbor?

bump for "banned- night" on GFY

if you are a content producer and have not filed for copyright on your work, jump into my new thread:

How to copyright your content for DMCA and infringements
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=929941

and now back to your regularly scheduled tube bashing...


Fight the interlude!

:thumbsup:thumbsup

Can you search the Chilling Effects site to see what kinds of DMCA's have been submitted to Google for these sites? Would be curious.