GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Vaccine kills girl hours after injection (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=930513)

stickyfingerz 09-29-2009 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16370239)
The swine flu vaccinations in the 70's brought rise to many cases of normally rare Gillian-Barre (it was proven there was a link). I am not going to have myself or my family vaccinated for swine flu this time around either, I prefer not to take a risk with my children. As for the gardisil or whatever it is, that's all fine and well and good, but it's a much better option to me in my mind to teach my children when they are of age about things like safe sex, the dangers that lurk, and how to protect themselves. Most cases of hpv are directly related to risky sex, forwarned is forarmed.

You've got it. ;) Swine flue, is another stupid one for a vaccine. HPV honestly whats the percentage of woman that get cervical cancer? I know a lot of women and I can't recall one of them getting cervical cancer and dying. Not saying it doesn't happen a lot, but its not worth the risk of one of my kids dying to get some shot that really hasn't been proven to stop it anyways.

LadyMischief 09-29-2009 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16370438)
That is such fucking bullshit.

Here's a little list of just a few of the things you'd have seen regularly in your surroundings before we started "messing with mother nature". In many third world countries where they're too poor to mess with mother nature, you still see them with varying regularity.

Click the links for pictures to show just what we're missing out on.

smallpox
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Bangladesh.jpg

polio
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...lio.large1.jpg


noma
http://salt.claretianpubs.org/shake/...0411a-noma.jpg

congenital syphilis
http://www.cubaheadlines.com/files/c...0congenita.jpg

rickets
http://bryanking.net/wp-content/uplo...05/rickets.jpg

congenital rubella syndrome
http://www.pathguy.com/sol/53732.jpg

the bubonic plague
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ue_-buboes.jpg


Bravo. Those diseases are just a TINY MINISCULE minority of the diseases that are out there today. Again as I say, for every disease we "cure" how many more come out of the woodwork that we can do nothing but stand by and watch? AIDS is a good example of this, doesn't matter how much money you have, AIDS is a good equalizer. As rain forests are razes, the far reaches of the world are explored, more and more vicious illnesses are introduced (or re-introduced) into the gene pool. I'm not saying medical research and the progress we've made is not a good thing, but getting rid of those illnesses did not suddenly cure humanity, and a constant effort is needed (and is only really happening in the countries that can afford it) to stave them off. We haven't "won" the war, simply came out on top of a few skirmishes, and even then, the "victory" is fleeting. If the whole system breaks down tomorrow and vaccinations stop worldwide, there is NOTHING stopping those illnesses from becoming a part of the equation once again.

Libertine 09-29-2009 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16370427)
And what if your child is suffering from something just as bad if not worse because the vaccine that was given out like candy turned out 10 years later to be the cause of something even worse? Guilt is NOT a good reason to get children vaccinated. Wonder how the people who were cripped or had family die from Guillam Barre after their Swine Flu Vaccination felt. Did they feel guilty? It's never a black and white thing, but NOT having children vaccinated is a decision that ultimately falls to the parents, just as having vaccinations is. In either case, one must weigh the pros and cons and decide what they feel is best for their child.

33 years ago (in medicine, that's huge), a vaccine that was most likely contaminated because it was prepared in way that we don't use anymore, 25 people died. Plus, even for that specific vaccine, the risk it had of causing GBS was still only half that of the risk a normal flu has of causing GBS.

With contemporary flu vaccines, the vaccine has about 2% of the risk of causing GBS as the flu itself does - not to mention the fact that the flu also has a rather large chance of causing plan, simple death.

Meanwhile, in the past 100 years, vaccines have saved the lives of hundreds of millions of people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16370427)
Personally, I've always found that our bodies are miraculous things, and they will most oftentimes fix themselves.. The more crap we pour down our throats or have poked into our veins doesn't really win us any ground, because every time we "defeat" one illness, five more crop on it it's place. Superbugs are a good example of this... they were created by the very thing that was meant to help... .antibiotics... an OVERUSE of antibiotics, generally because parents who's kid have a little sniffle can't let mother nature run it's course, but demand their doctors fix things, and the doctors comply even when they know it's not neccessary so they feel they've done their jobs. In our "instant gratification" society, people place too much importance on the quick fix instead of allowing things to take their own course. Who suffers for this? EVERYONE, because now those superbugs are out there, and both the morons who don't know the difference between a bacteria and a virus (antibiotics are USELESS against viruses, but that's what most cold and flus are), and the people who chose differently are now exposed to these things. When my kids get sick, unless they are REALLY sick and can't get better on their own, I care for them through it, but I let them fight it off. Why? Because it's GOOD for their immune systems, it helps prevent MORE illnesses in the future, and my kids rarely if ever get sick for more than a day anymore, while half of their classmates are home every other week because they have no immune system and are flooded with antibiotics. It's a ridiculous, vicious circle I choose not to feed into.

While overuse of antibiotics is most certainly a bad thing, they definitely have helped us win ground against "mother nature". See the examples I mentioned in my post above.

ruth 09-29-2009 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16370398)
Unprotected sex with someone who has HPV = HPV infection. Not knowing what to look for with your sexual partner = risk of HPV infection.

Nope, wrong. Go read up. Condoms don't = protected, it decreases risk but doesn't remove risk.

BradM 09-29-2009 09:36 AM

Don't get shots. Period. I don't care what everyone says there is no way I will get a flu shot.

Libertine 09-29-2009 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16370464)
Bravo. Those diseases are just a TINY MINISCULE minority of the diseases that are out there today. Again as I say, for every disease we "cure" how many more come out of the woodwork that we can do nothing but stand by and watch? AIDS is a good example of this, doesn't matter how much money you have, AIDS is a good equalizer. As rain forests are razes, the far reaches of the world are explored, more and more vicious illnesses are introduced (or re-introduced) into the gene pool. I'm not saying medical research and the progress we've made is not a good thing, but getting rid of those illnesses did not suddenly cure humanity, and a constant effort is needed (and is only really happening in the countries that can afford it) to stave them off. We haven't "won" the war, simply came out on top of a few skirmishes, and even then, the "victory" is fleeting. If the whole system breaks down tomorrow and vaccinations stop worldwide, there is NOTHING stopping those illnesses from becoming a part of the equation once again.

Those diseases are also only just a small selection of the ones we can now treat successfully.

On the other hand, they used to be absolutely rampant. Smallpox alone killed more people in the 20th century than Hitler, Stalin and Mao combined did - several times more, at that.

The fact that life expectancy keeps creeping up in western countries is not a coincidence. Most people in rich countries these days have a good chance of dying from old age, accidents or their own stupidity. That used to be quite a bit different.

Fletch XXX 09-29-2009 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16370449)
You've got it. ;) Swine flue, is another stupid one for a vaccine. HPV honestly whats the percentage of woman that get cervical cancer? I know a lot of women and I can't recall one of them getting cervical cancer and dying. Not saying it doesn't happen a lot, but its not worth the risk of one of my kids dying to get some shot that really hasn't been proven to stop it anyways.

ah ha! there you are LOL

did you see my post to you on page 1? LOL

guns and ammo at the ready :1orglaugh

LadyMischief 09-29-2009 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruth (Post 16370489)
Nope, wrong. Go read up. Condoms don't = protected, it decreases risk but doesn't remove risk.

What condoms don't protect, good education does :)

ruth 09-29-2009 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16370835)
What condoms don't protect, good education does :)

Ha, if you say so. :1orglaugh

After Shock Media 09-29-2009 06:23 PM

Another damn good reason why a lot of people should not have access to the internet.
Vaccines are way safer than ever before, very few are getting rich off of them, especially since so many are just given away. The risks from reacting from a vaccination are so minimal that they barely show up as a blip on the public radar, and yes the CDC monitors this shit like crazy.
The HPV stuff is even more crazy, sure it is new, sure people lived for not just thousands but hundreds of thousands of years. Then again we could check average life expectancy of people (not using the bible of course) but of course that would not really matter right? Cervical cancer is pretty damn high on the list and HPV is the number 1 cause of it. Few other things cause it too and yes they are looking into those too.

Kind of funny people are always bitching that nobody tries to cure anything and those types of arguments. Yet often the very damn same people are often against such treatments. Then people act surprised when the US recently started to see polio cases again.

Personally do not care what you do or do not put in your bodies. Just do not go around saying shit like it is child abuse or other stupid shit. I also think if you do not give your kids vaccines I am on the side of not allowing them into public schools. Not giving your dogs vaccines should also prevent them from going to public dog parks.

Agent 488 09-29-2009 06:26 PM

that some people refuse vaccines is darwinism at its finest.

stickyfingerz 09-29-2009 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 16372284)
that some people refuse vaccines is darwinism at its finest.

Yes just like vets recommend you get your dogs vaccinated every year... even though it kills the dogs much earlier. lol Science and medicine have no ulterior motives nah... And they never make mistakes. LOL

Lets see my daughter had to get her required shots 2 times because the vaccine cabinets were not maintaining tempeture correctly. Awesome. That was great to have to hold my crying daughter twice while getting shots I really wasn't too excited for her to get in the first place.

cherrylula 09-29-2009 06:53 PM

I am 8 months pregnant and they want me to get a regular flu vaccine and the swine flu vaccine as soon as it comes in.

cherrylula 09-29-2009 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 16372278)
Another damn good reason why a lot of people should not have access to the internet.

You think some people should be restricted from accessing the internet? That's scarier than the vaccine conspiracies. :error :1orglaugh

Ayla_SquareTurtle 09-29-2009 07:05 PM

I'm not anti-vaccine per se, but this HPV vaccine seems waaaaay too political. I don't believe many people on either side of it have the girls' best interests at heart. It's either money or morals, but not girls' lives.

After Shock Media 09-29-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 16372340)
You think some people should be restricted from accessing the internet? That's scarier than the vaccine conspiracies. :error :1orglaugh

It is sarcasm, but fuck it I am not really that interested in replying to you after you have accused me of troll and even said you were putting me on ignore.

Some people get overly excited and buy into assorted nut jobs mumbo jumbo. Long ago this was not of much concern as the typical neighborhood crazy stayed to him/herself. Now they can network and have some have even become popular authorities. Would I really cut them off, no I do believe in such freedoms. Even if it does cause crazy to spread.

TheDA 09-30-2009 01:40 AM

Cancer jab 'unlikely' death cause

A girl who died shortly after being given a cervical cancer vaccine had a "serious underlying medical condition", an NHS Trust has said.

ruth 09-30-2009 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayla_SquareTurtle (Post 16372365)
I'm not anti-vaccine per se, but this HPV vaccine seems waaaaay too political. I don't believe many people on either side of it have the girls' best interests at heart. It's either money or morals, but not girls' lives.

That's the point of the vaccine. To save lives.
1 in 4 women are supposed to carry hpv so that's a large number of women who could potentially develop cancer, or precancer where they have cell changes and just have to spend years worrying if theirs might develop into worse at some point. That does have girls' best interests at heart. How does it not?

Fletch XXX 09-30-2009 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 16373036)
Cancer jab 'unlikely' death cause

A girl who died shortly after being given a cervical cancer vaccine had a "serious underlying medical condition", an NHS Trust has said.

Odd article considering they dont name ANY condition, and the article most just repeats over and over: vaccine is safe, program should continue. over and over LOL

but nothing about her *condition*
:helpme

GatorB 09-30-2009 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 16370071)
yes, all over the new here. However, one out of the MANY that have it every year is a very small risk.

Yes, I would have my daughter have it and protect herself from cervical cancer. Imagine NOT having your daughter get it and watching her die of cervical cancer..a very not pretty death..because one allergic reaction scared you.

I'm not sure why haters take small things and make them bigger than the main problem. same people use the excuse for not wearing a setbelt because some guy died because he was wearing seat belt and he would have lived if he didn't. Well yeah that happens but I'll go with the odds that say you are more likely to live with a seat belt.

every few years you hear about some guy getting killed by lightning while INSIDE his house. So using the OPs logic when there's a thunderstorm I should go outside to avoid being killed that way.

GatorB 09-30-2009 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16370449)
You've got it. ;) Swine flue, is another stupid one for a vaccine. HPV honestly whats the percentage of woman that get cervical cancer? I know a lot of women and I can't recall one of them getting cervical cancer and dying. Not saying it doesn't happen a lot, but its not worth the risk of one of my kids dying to get some shot that really hasn't been proven to stop it anyways.


Once again retardation. The risk of you kid dying form a HPV vaccine is MUCH MUCH lower than dying of cervical cancer. But go ahead you don't look like a math genius to me. what happens if one of you kids gets cervical cancer and you knew you could have prevented it with a shot. Are you going to look her in the eye and admit you murdered her?

According to the CDC in 2005( last year for data ) 3,924 died from cervical cancer. As far as I'm concerned as long as the number of deaths from the vaccine is under 3924 you are saving lives. Basic math even a retarded child knows.

Robbie 09-30-2009 07:29 AM

Another tragedy of this girl dying:
The overwhelming odds were she would NEVER have cervical cancer anyway.

"According to the latest global estimates,
274,000 women die
of the disease annually"


That's a lot of women. But when you put it percentage wise...there are how many BILLION people in this world? And at least half of them are women. So the chances are that young girl was never going to get cervical cancer anyway.

To put it in perspective that is 274,000 women Now check this:
"The top killer for women is heart disease, which claims nearly 489,000 deaths each year. Heart disease kills more women every year than all types of cancers combined."

So that little girl would have been better off learning proper nutrition (which not only could help prevent heart disease but also cancer as well) and excercise to fend off heart disease.

It's a conundrum for sure.

I have two daughters by the way. Got them both the vaccination. Like most folks I'm scared by what doctors say and tend to blindly follow their advice. Thank God there were no problems.

It was statistically speaking...very probably an unnecessary vaccination. But human nature made me willing to go along with it "just in case"

GatorB 09-30-2009 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16373701)
Another tragedy of this girl dying:
The overwhelming odds were she would NEVER have cervical cancer anyway.

"According to the latest global estimates,
274,000 women die
of the disease annually"


That's a lot of women. But when you put it percentage wise...there are how many BILLION people in this world? And at least half of them are women. So the chances are that young girl was never going to get cervical cancer anyway.

To put it in perspective that is 274,000 women Now check this:
"The top killer for women is heart disease, which claims nearly 489,000 deaths each year. Heart disease kills more women every year than all types of cancers combined."

So that little girl would have been better off learning proper nutrition (which not only could help prevent heart disease but also cancer as well) and excercise to fend off heart disease.

It's a conundrum for sure.

I have two daughters by the way. Got them both the vaccination. Like most folks I'm scared by what doctors say and tend to blindly follow their advice. Thank God there were no problems.

It was statistically speaking...very probably an unnecessary vaccination. But human nature made me willing to go along with it "just in case"

Since you like to bring up statistics it was even more statistically unlikely she'd die from the shot. Once again YOU GO WITH THE ODDS. Do you hit on 20 in blackjack? Why not? You have a 1/13 chance of getting an ace.

beerptrol 09-30-2009 07:47 AM

well atleast she didn't die of cervical cancer

Fletch XXX 09-30-2009 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16373701)
Another tragedy of this girl dying:
The overwhelming odds were she would NEVER have cervical cancer anyway.

"According to the latest global estimates,
274,000 women die
of the disease annually"


That's a lot of women. But when you put it percentage wise...there are how many BILLION people in this world? And at least half of them are women. So the chances are that young girl was never going to get cervical cancer anyway.

To put it in perspective that is 274,000 women Now check this:
"The top killer for women is heart disease, which claims nearly 489,000 deaths each year. Heart disease kills more women every year than all types of cancers combined."

So that little girl would have been better off learning proper nutrition (which not only could help prevent heart disease but also cancer as well) and excercise to fend off heart disease.

It's a conundrum for sure.

I have two daughters by the way. Got them both the vaccination. Like most folks I'm scared by what doctors say and tend to blindly follow their advice. Thank God there were no problems.

It was statistically speaking...very probably an unnecessary vaccination. But human nature made me willing to go along with it "just in case"

As i said, one thing remains: had she not been given that shot, she'd be here today.

That thought will sit in the parents mind until they both die.

stickyfingerz 09-30-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16373676)
Once again retardation. The risk of you kid dying form a HPV vaccine is MUCH MUCH lower than dying of cervical cancer. But go ahead you don't look like a math genius to me. what happens if one of you kids gets cervical cancer and you knew you could have prevented it with a shot. Are you going to look her in the eye and admit you murdered her?

According to the CDC in 2005( last year for data ) 3,924 died from cervical cancer. As far as I'm concerned as long as the number of deaths from the vaccine is under 3924 you are saving lives. Basic math even a retarded child knows.

3924 deaths a year and Im supposed to risk injecting my kids with an unknown non long term tested vaccine that could cause more potential health issues that we don't know about years and years from now. Ok ya..


In 2003 there were 6,328,000 car accidents in the US. There were 2.9 million injuries and 42,643 people were killed in auto accidents.


Guess I REALLY shouldn't let them ever drive a car cause damn.. they are likely to die.


What flavor is the koolaid this week?

After Shock Media 09-30-2009 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16373701)
Another tragedy of this girl dying:
The overwhelming odds were she would NEVER have cervical cancer anyway.

"According to the latest global estimates,
274,000 women die
of the disease annually"


That's a lot of women. But when you put it percentage wise...there are how many BILLION people in this world? And at least half of them are women. So the chances are that young girl was never going to get cervical cancer anyway.

To put it in perspective that is 274,000 women Now check this:
"The top killer for women is heart disease, which claims nearly 489,000 deaths each year. Heart disease kills more women every year than all types of cancers combined."

So that little girl would have been better off learning proper nutrition (which not only could help prevent heart disease but also cancer as well) and excercise to fend off heart disease.

It's a conundrum for sure.

I have two daughters by the way. Got them both the vaccination. Like most folks I'm scared by what doctors say and tend to blindly follow their advice. Thank God there were no problems.

It was statistically speaking...very probably an unnecessary vaccination. But human nature made me willing to go along with it "just in case"

Those are global estimates. Now Robbie do you really think they are that good at guessing at how many died of what in all of the odd ball third world countries where people do not even see doctors let alone get autopsies.

All they can do is take a guess by using data from the places that keep track, even those numbers are often flawed as not everyone is fully diagnosed properly or gets a chance to die from it (yes had a friend with leukemia who well died by getting hit by a car). Then they take that data and attempt to multiply it properly.

Then when you speak of heart disease, it is called a silent killer in women for many reasons. Big reason is that women just do not get checked out or think about hereditary issues. It is not diet or exercise related, of course eating properly and exercise will probably/more than likely help though. (keep in mind there are those health nuts who do drop dead from a stroke or heart attack, but that shouldn't be a deterrent to good nutrition and exercise either). Anyways back on point. It is the number 1 killer of women but may I bring up that heart disease is not contagious like HPV is. So the more it gets spread around the higher the number can go.

Robbie 09-30-2009 08:17 PM

I only brought up the statistics because the way the public is presented with this...it's like: "if you don't get your daughter this vaccination she WILL die from cervical cancer"

And that just isn't true. It's not even close to true.

But as I said...I drank the koolaid myself and had the vaccination given to my daughters a few months ago.

Everything went great. The odds were unquestionable in my favor.

But IF I had forced my two babies to take that shot (and of course they did NOT want to take any shot lol ) and then I had watched them die....Well, I would have become a statistic of another kind, because I would have put a shotgun in my mouth.

I can't even fathom what that girls parents are feeling.

EDIT: My "babies" are teenagers by the way, before any smartasses chip in about giving this particular vaccination to babies lol

Sarah_Jayne 10-01-2009 02:31 AM

She had a chest tumour that could have killed her at any time. Coroner says the vaccine looks to have had no factor in her death but they are looking into it further.

Libertine 10-01-2009 03:12 AM

The lesson to be learned in this thread: quite a few people do not understand statistics and comparative risk.

bbobby86 10-01-2009 05:47 AM

always found that our bodies are miraculous things... yea...

tranza 10-01-2009 05:50 AM

Well, shit happens...

RenegadeCash Mark 10-01-2009 08:02 AM

All i can say is that it's a real shame and sad.

Babaganoosh 10-01-2009 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 16373637)
Odd article considering they dont name ANY condition, and the article most just repeats over and over: vaccine is safe, program should continue. over and over LOL

but nothing about her *condition*
:helpme

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8284517.stm

A girl who was vaccinated against cervical cancer died from a malignant tumour of the chest and not from a reaction to the jab, it has emerged.

Way to jump to conclusions, whack job.

Barefootsies 10-01-2009 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 16370009)
Thing is this kind of thing happens to certain people with just about every vaccine thats ever been made. The only time you hear about it though is when its a new vaccine, like this one or the swine flu vaccine.

Exactly. Like if you are allergic to eggs.

They make some of these vaccine's in chicken eggs. So obviously if you are allergic, you should avoid it. There are typically a narrow group of people who fall into this with almost all vaccines, or medicines.

Fletch XXX 10-01-2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 16378332)
Exactly. Like if you are allergic to eggs.

They make some of these vaccine's in chicken eggs. So obviously if you are allergic, you should avoid it. There are typically a narrow group of people who fall into this with almost all vaccines, or medicines.

you got a point ...

hmm im allergic to idiots, maybe i should stay off GFY now :1orglaugh

Richard Dawkins 10-01-2009 10:29 AM

Do you forget the days where people died much younger than they do now? Do you forget what happened pre-vaccinations? Yes, I'm a parent. Yes, I vaccinate. Lots of people die in car accidents but I still drive my child around in a car. Lots of people have died from school shootings, yet my child still attends school. This young girl's life is indeed valuable, but her death was an unfortunate exception, not the rule. If your new baby is not vaccinated and ends up dying from something a vaccine could have prevented, how would you feel?

Richard Dawkins 10-01-2009 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babaganoosh (Post 16378325)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8284517.stm

A girl who was vaccinated against cervical cancer died from a malignant tumour of the chest and not from a reaction to the jab, it has emerged.

Way to jump to conclusions, whack job.


I guess she wasn't even an "unfortunate exception".

Vaccinate.

Babaganoosh 10-01-2009 03:02 PM

This thread makes me laugh. Now that it's known what actually caused the girl's death and all the hysteria has died down nobody gives a shit.

Not one peep from the "SEE? SEE? WE TOLD YOU IT WAS A DANGEROUS GOVERNMENT COVERUP" people.

Myst 10-01-2009 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 16373771)
As i said, one thing remains: had she not been given that shot, she'd be here today.

That thought will sit in the parents mind until they both die.

Fletch sorry but you're an idiot. There are some 12,000 new cases of cervical cancer in the USA alone per year. Cervical cancer is caused by HPV, human papilloma virus. This vaccine protects against the most common strains of the virus and will bring down cancer rates by 70%+ in those that get vaccinated. How can you possibly justify not giving someone the vaccine? There has been one 'death' linked to the vaccine, and now we know that the young girl died from a tumor in her chest and not from the vaccine itself.

As a medical student nothing pisses me off more than whackjobs and their bullshit anti-vaccine nonsense. I see more and more retards not vaccinating their children against diseases and we see pathogens that we thought were under control reemerging. Polio is a classic example.

Not only do you morons risk the health and safety of yourself and your children by not vaccinating, you risk the safety of society at large.

Vaccinate.

Fletch XXX 10-01-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myst (Post 16379829)
Fletch sorry but you're an idiot.

i stopped reading there, you cant possibly have anything to say LOL :1orglaugh

McSpike 07-21-2010 03:39 AM

My daughter will never in her life while under my roof get vaccinated by silly unneeded vaccines that are produces solely for bigger profits - meaning other than tetanus, fuck you pharmaboys, no money from me! If you invest in pharmacy and the stock profit of vaccine makers is more important to you than the health of your kids, then by god, get them vaccinated. Otherwise stay the hell away from this shit.

You can have me arrested, do whatever you will but if you put this crap in my kid's body you put yourself at risk of heavily fucking up your life. The shit that I would put on you would be unbearable.

$5 submissions 07-21-2010 03:40 AM

Isn't there a law that gives some strict liability protections to vaccines?

McSpike 07-21-2010 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myst (Post 16379829)
Fletch sorry but you're an idiot. There are some 12,000 new cases of cervical cancer in the USA alone per year. Cervical cancer is caused by HPV, human papilloma virus. This vaccine protects against the most common strains of the virus and will bring down cancer rates by 70%+ in those that get vaccinated. How can you possibly justify not giving someone the vaccine? There has been one 'death' linked to the vaccine, and now we know that the young girl died from a tumor in her chest and not from the vaccine itself.

As a medical student nothing pisses me off more than whackjobs and their bullshit anti-vaccine nonsense. I see more and more retards not vaccinating their children against diseases and we see pathogens that we thought were under control reemerging. Polio is a classic example.

Not only do you morons risk the health and safety of yourself and your children by not vaccinating, you risk the safety of society at large.

Vaccinate.

You have been brainwashed. Don't bug yourself about it. You now can't possibly understand the problem anymore. You are on their side now.

Forget the money that runs the show, forget the media run by the same money, forget politics run by the same money. It's all good because the money said so.

You can't possibly oppose to this now since it wasn't your kid and the docs pulled you over.

Fear sells. Period.

McSpike 07-21-2010 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 17351176)
Isn't there a law that gives some strict liability protections to vaccines?

Depends on your country.

We have a law here that vaccination is obligatory and we can get fined if we don't get them vaccinated.

But in practice they rather don't fine people in order not to cause some public debate over it. Smart choice. Last vaccine craze that "helped prevent the flu of catastrophic proportions" was marketed heavily all over the world by the WHO and the vaccine makers. In our country like 85% of the people said "FUCK OFF!" and rightfully so - they are all still alive and well and the flu died while the other 15% are now infected with heavy metals...

People that get their kids vaccinated mostly don't read all the facts and just do it because others did it. But that's how life is. And then they say we get fucked by monetary system, capitalism, consumerism and whatnot. Nope, it's all you, the individual who blindly trusts the system.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123