LOL, excellent. I can imagine many people using this pic as "prove" that the landing was all fake.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/20...myths-debunked

The killer radiation

Claim: Apollo astronauts could not have travelled to the moon as a giant belt of lethal space radiation would have frazzled them.

Why it's nonsense: These so called Van Allen belts, where the Earth's magnetic field collects solar radiation, would be dangerous only if people were to hang out there for several days. The astronauts whizzed through in a matter of hours, and received a radiation dose similar to an X-ray. "You can pass through quite safely as long as you don't linger too long," Millard says.

Sigh.

Damn you, pesky science, for spoiling the tinfoil hat wearing loons' fun!

If NASA paid everybody off, did they pay off the KGB and all of their spies too? I'm sure Russia would have been absolutely delighted to point out to the world that the lunar landings were fake.

OH where was NASA when Y2K hit?? WHERE!!
2012 nothing is going to happen, seriously more than likely the guy creating the calendar was going to continue until his wife said, "get into the house now it's dinner time".. or his friends said, "seriously dude, stop with the counting already, we get it!!"

i'm not assuming anything, stop assuming that i am. you need to investigate how large an operation the lunar landings were. and i will pose the same basic question to you after you've done that- were ALL 6 landings faked over the 8 year span of trips to the moon?

now you assume way too much, so much, it's laughable.

i've delved into both sides. just because i believe they are legit does NOT mean i haven't watched zero apollo, or read a litany of material about how they were fake. just like i've read, watched, discussed material re: them being real. i've come to the conclusion that they were in fact real.

your government lies stance really is sophmoric thinking. did the government lie about the highway system? well, they must have, they are the government, so all those roads i've seen on the maps must be one big charade of highways and by-ways.

people like you two need to learn something called *critical thinking* especially in the day of internet, photoshop, hollywood and youtube. when you do, you will realize many other people ALREADY know how to critically think on their own and aren't just simply choosing a side.

:thumbsup

Yeah... pretty much what I said way up there in post 31. :winkwink:

the problem as I see it, is that you just simply dont agree with my"critical" thinking and stop with the simplistic bullshit about the highways:2 cents:

posting in op's trolling thread...

you are the one simplifying into a few people a huge agency with thousands of employees dedicated to a project.

i will retract my simplified example if you can point to any verifiable information that it would only take a few people to pull off the "fake production"

i won't expect you to show proof from ALL the other countries, including our enemies at the time, that tracked every single lunar landing on radar.

Where is your evidence that the moon itself is not a fake....? According to you nobody has ever been there. What you see in the sky is only what you believe to be the moon, it could well be something else.

Love to , unfortunately my security clearence has lapsed .......:disgust While I am not saying that the landing was fake, as I was watching it in awe, with everyone else at the time. I am keeping an open mind to possibilities, that a hoax of that magnitude could be pulled off, specially back then. :2 cents:

The moon doesn't exist either... see sig for real traffic.

Well, then where does Cheese come from ??:upsidedow

the government?

this is a tell-tale sign of people who are sheep..

i can think for myself, i dont need the USA govt to tell me what we did..

The fact is WE did not land on the moon.. Come on think about it with your brain.. IF we were able to do it dozens of years ago with crappy technology and computers as complex as tv's today, then why havent we gone since??

Sheesh, if we were able to land on the moon, then surely man should be going to the moon every year after that... its like telling me we were able to make flying cars 30yrs ago but all of a sudden we cant...

EVERY single piece of technology/advancement has gone WAY up. if they were able to build a machine to reach the moon safely tens of years ago, today we should be able to get there EASIER, CHEAPER & SAFER..

But we all know its impossible.... man did not land on the moon.. take it or leave it... and ya the gov can shut people up... its simple logic, why havent we done it since then? surely NASA can afford to go to the moon again, its been what? 40 years? and we STILL cant go to the moon?

Its like saying someone built a car that could go from New York to Florida 30 years ago, but today NO car can do it anymore, that would make no sense...

gotta have love for the uneducated people who can *think for themselves* all the while looking down their noses at the educated.

im not looking down at anyone.. this moon landing argument gets nowhere.. people believe what they want. and im not uneducated ..

all im saying is explain why we sent man 200,000 miles away 30years ago but havent sent anyone even 1000 miles past earth surface since then?

surely something doesnt seem right?

dont tell me no advanced country can come up with the money.. heck if there was a way, the USA would pay for it.. we spend billions on space research yearly.. so funding isnt an issue, well not for 30 years in a row now

i guess you skipped over my factoid comment on page 1, where i stated the budget for NASA to get us to the moon was 5% of our nation's ENTIRE budget for several years. do you know what NASA's budget is today? a % of 1%.

fact is, it is ridiculously expensive to go to the moon AND the goals of NASA changed after that to the shuttle program, launching satellites, mars, hubble telescope, etc.


it's really not a valid argument to say that all 6 lunar landings were a hoax simply because we haven't gone back a 7th time or multiple more times after that.

LOL i just googled and no it wsnt 5% of our nations budget for serveral years.. Also you have to wake up and admit that your great country did not have the technology to send a man to the moon in the 1970s.. simple and short..

No point arguing here, we have different opinions. so w/e. we landed 100 monkeys on the moon, heck i have a house on the moon right now.. who cares... sheep will be sheep

BY THE WAY it COSTS so much because we were RESEARCHING it..

NOW THE TECHNOLOGY IS THERE, we just need a vessel to get us there, so the whole budget issue is BS..

All that money was supposedly spent on research, so now the technology is seemingly there, it shuld cost us a fraction to get man to the moon..

Afterall according to NASA we sent man up there on a spaceship not some special alienship or something, so building another one should be even cheaper,

can't really have a discussion with you if you aren't prepared for facts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Bu...project_Apollo