GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Should birth control be mandatory if you are on welfare? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=940262)

AtlantisCash 11-25-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul (Post 16583939)
Please educate yourself and see that there are no real problems with resources.
Your conclusion that Chinese people learned "economical way of thinking" by being forced is hilarious.
Your numbers and speculations are just anecdotical evidence.
But you're right about one point, theres a problem with education :)


there are things might be learned by being forced though, i didn't say Chinese people learned economical way of living by being forced,

i said they wouldn't want to have lots of children anymore,

screw it at all, we are talking about razing a human baby here,

while even having one kid is a big responsible, how can You come to me with such defence?

you live in the western community;

tell me, if Your people didn't work hard, if they breed like dogs, if they didn't educate them selfs,if they were not aware of responsibility of having a child, how the fuck you would develop as this?

e.g: can Bangladesh come even close to Norway with it's over 100 million population beside 3.5 million?

simple math simple as it man :2 cents:

dav3 11-25-2009 08:32 AM

As long as the government keeps giving twits more and more 'free money' for having more and more kids, it will continue being a growing 'business' for them.

Especially with tards like octomom and jon and kate setting the example that having a shitload of kids could make you famous, is only adding fuel to this fire that is pretty much burning down our country.

:Oh crap
:disgust

cherrylula 11-25-2009 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tam (Post 16583998)

I do think, however, that mental capacity should be a measure of whether one should be put on mandatory birth control though. I know of one girl right now, her parents are both pretty well off but that girl can't even boil water or take care of herself on ANY level.... where a lower income class will tend to teach their kids SOME skill levels to help their kids survive in the world. My oldest son's ex-girlfriend will be 19 in one month, she is in college and that kid can't even boil water, she can't function at all on her own.... not even for a minute. Her parents put careers and church ahead of her all of her life. She has to label her food in her own home so her parents don't eat her food and if her name isn't on it, she isn't allowed to eat it. She is now living on her own and she is into so many drugs and drinking that she doesn't even know she can't boil water or feed herself because she stays so zoned out she doesn't know where she's at half the time. And this is from an upper middle income class home. She once called her dad an asshole and they put her in "Jesus Jail" for three days..... this consisted of being put in the basement for 24 hours at a time and no food or anything, and told to pray for forgiveness for disrespecting her father... once she would confess that she has repented, she was only then allowed out of Jesus Jail. She was 7 at this time.

that is child abuse plain and simple.

can you really blame abused children for the behaviors they pick up after years of torment and abuse like this though?

Tam 11-25-2009 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 16584020)
that is child abuse plain and simple.

can you really blame abused children for the behaviors they pick up after years of torment and abuse like this though?

Nope not at all, as an abused child myself.... no I cannot. And I don't blame her one little bit. My family did all we could to show her that is the opposite of what a FAMILY is supposed to be. She is one of these kids that, on the outside, everyone thought this was the perfect little family, she was dressed to the hilt growing up, got all the fancy cars and blah blah blah.... but on the inside, that kid is a complete mess. I could go on and on and on on just this kid.... she was not one time ever PHYSICALLY abused and some mental and lots of emotional.... that was the abuse I suffered..... but I think when it comes down to it, I think my abuse is minimum (and it was bad) next to hers. A few weeks ago, she was called home to her Dad, she got there and he took her car..... HER car, and changed the tires on HIS car with hers.. leaving her, his own child with tires with the metal showing thru on 3 of them, just so HIS tires were good. She had to sign a disclaimer to go onto his race track so she wouldn't sue him if she got hurt and if she didn't, she wasn't allowed on that track.

All in all, she is a good kid, very sweet and caring, she is just so twisted as to what is right and wrong.. but if you can get her off the drugs and away from them long enough, she sees what her childhood is, she just doesn't have the support base like i had to get her out of it. She broke up with my son because he tried to help her and be her support base, but Dad said to break up with him, he's a bad influence, so she did. And we cannot blame her for anything at all.. it isn't her fault her head is twisted.

Mental capacity is key, in my opinion.

jalami 11-25-2009 08:43 AM

Not to worry people, when the US goes bankrupt there won't be any money for welfare and these folks will be on their own.

AtlantisCash 11-25-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 16583887)
damn a real parasite...

:2 cents:

baddog 11-25-2009 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16583487)
They need to restrict what you can buy with food stamps.

They do.

beemk 11-25-2009 11:13 AM

i think they should be forced to be on birth control. they already proved they cant care for themselves. someone who cares for themselves doesn't rely on the gov to get $ for food and shelter. if they cant care for themselves we shouldn't have to spend even more $ caring for their kids.

TheDoc 11-25-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalami (Post 16584054)
Not to worry people, when the US goes bankrupt there won't be any money for welfare and these folks will be on their own.

America officially went bankrupt in 1933.... but because the entire world runs on a fake wealth/debt system and nobody actually has the ability to back the value of money, and all Countries are already bankrupt, nobody really is transferring money - simply bank ledgers...

They can't let the system fail.... or it will be gone forever making 'them' will lose total control over the system they created.

The people will be taken care of, or they aren't working, to create/produce wealth, to be taken away.

Martin 11-25-2009 12:13 PM

I think we should just kill people who ask such dumb questions.

Ayla_SquareTurtle 11-25-2009 01:00 PM

Although I obviously do not think that people on welfare should be having more children, I don't see something like this ever working in reality.

Furthermore, it takes 2 people to create these children, and 2 people need to be held responsible. Deadbeat parents owe hundreds of millions of dollars in child support. Maybe if a little more effort was put into making people pay for their legal responsibilities, and making it extremely uncomfortable for them not to do so, the burden on the welfare system wouldn't be as heavy.

PornMD 11-25-2009 01:14 PM

I think unfortunately no matter what we do, people on welfare will drag all of us making moderate income on our own down to poverty in the name of helping take care of poor people. Government-forced birth control will never happen in the "land of the free". It's one of the things we've always bitched at China for. And what do you know, China is kicking our ass economically and basically holding us up by a thread...obviously due to MANY reasons of course.

The more time goes on and the more fucked the world gets, the more obvious it's not going to get better. It takes people banding together - large quantities of people, and the only thing people do that for is voting someone to be American Idol or putting in the first (semi) African American president regardless of qualifications. People care more about stories that aren't even TRUE (Balloon Boy) than the shit that matters anymore.

kane 11-25-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayla_SquareTurtle (Post 16584983)
Although I obviously do not think that people on welfare should be having more children, I don't see something like this ever working in reality.

Furthermore, it takes 2 people to create these children, and 2 people need to be held responsible. Deadbeat parents owe hundreds of millions of dollars in child support. Maybe if a little more effort was put into making people pay for their legal responsibilities, and making it extremely uncomfortable for them not to do so, the burden on the welfare system wouldn't be as heavy.

This is a good point. A friend of mine is married and has three kids. Two are his and their oldest his wife had with her ex husband in a previous marriage. Her ex is a major deadbeat. The daughter that she has with him just turned 16 and only in this last year did he start paying child support. The only reason he did is because the courts finally caught up with him. He would work, then once they caught up with him and start to garnish his wages he would quit and live off friends and family for a while until he got another job. He is an electrician and can make pretty good money. He eventually got remarried and had two kids with the new wife then got divorced. She joined in and came after him and finally the court told him that if he didn't start paying they would take away his drivers license and any professional license and they would put him in jail. So it only took 15 years, but he is finally paying child support and he owes so much on back payments that she will probably never see it.

If fathers were held more accountable, there would be a lot less problems.

kane 11-25-2009 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16584010)
there are things might be learned by being forced though, i didn't say Chinese people learned economical way of living by being forced,

i said they wouldn't want to have lots of children anymore,

screw it at all, we are talking about razing a human baby here,

while even having one kid is a big responsible, how can You come to me with such defence?

you live in the western community;

tell me, if Your people didn't work hard, if they breed like dogs, if they didn't educate them selfs,if they were not aware of responsibility of having a child, how the fuck you would develop as this?

e.g: can Bangladesh come even close to Norway with it's over 100 million population beside 3.5 million?

simple math simple as it man :2 cents:

I think there are still population controls via the government in China. Last year a friend of mine's family played host to a Chinese exchange student. She lived in a city near Beijing and her mom worked for the population control arm of the government. She told us that if you live out in the country in China they don't care if you have more than one kid because you need them to help work your farm, but if you live in the city (where most people do) and you have more than one kid you get a pretty hefty fine for doing so.

LexiLexxx 11-25-2009 02:12 PM

YES!!!!

You can't afford yourself, you can't afford your own family!!!

Mexican's are known to have WAY to many kids!

Sid70 11-25-2009 02:31 PM

you are an idiot, real idiot you need to get a life and go see the world.

kane 11-25-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adultmix (Post 16585269)
you are an idiot, real idiot you need to get a life and go see the world.

Me or the post above you?

Sid70 11-25-2009 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 16585343)
Me or the post above you?

topic starter whoever he is. because he still lives in acountry of plenty and it's super pisdec if they still get bigger homes easily for making clones.

Sid70 11-25-2009 05:18 PM

okay, i will explain. this is a mozafaking happyness to have children, more the better, and you are talking mozafaking birth control. Are you a mozafaking republican?

Sid70 11-25-2009 05:18 PM

stop buying 5L cars first then talk childern problem.

SomeCreep 11-25-2009 05:58 PM

Let her breed. 5000 years from now, who's going to care what she did? No one.

HandballJim 11-25-2009 11:37 PM

and you forgot to mention that your welfare check is not for beer and cigs, I guess you dont know the system yet...more kids = more money from the city/state, plus you get an extra bedroom in public housing for pennies for each kid you have. :2 cents:

beemk 11-26-2009 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 16585181)
I think there are still population controls via the government in China. Last year a friend of mine's family played host to a Chinese exchange student. She lived in a city near Beijing and her mom worked for the population control arm of the government. She told us that if you live out in the country in China they don't care if you have more than one kid because you need them to help work your farm, but if you live in the city (where most people do) and you have more than one kid you get a pretty hefty fine for doing so.

china is smart, forced abortions... thats what we need!

fatfoo 11-26-2009 03:55 AM

So, recently there's been all this talk about whether it's right or not that children are the property of the state. Kids are scared nowadays. The kids say, "They are like Hitlers. They own the kids." Well, there's nothing they can do. Well kids - at least you have the option to grow up and be on the government's side and then you can also indoctrinate kids yourself. If you do a crime, supposedly you will go to jail. Anyway, I love Karen O, birth control and # of children is regulated in some countries. I believe that China has a law that people cannot have more than one child, so that they decrease their population growth rate.

Overload 11-26-2009 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim (Post 16583548)
So you're saying that if poor people want to eat, they have to promise not to reproduce.

What you are suggesting is a sort of reverse eugenics done under the guise of responsible social policy. No way anything like this will ever be allowed, nor should it.

People who are are poor and need social assistance most likely have a history of making bad decisions. We have to accept that people receiving public aid may use it inappropriately and the fact that they do doesn't mean the system doesn't provide a real benefit.

I would rather live in a country with a wasteful and bloated welfare system than in a country where the government forces a certain segment of the population to not procreate.

Giving up a basic human right in order to save a few tax dollars is a lousy deal.

AMEN! serious, as a german i think the question alone is NAZI attitude already :disgust

AtlantisCash 11-26-2009 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 16585181)
I think there are still population controls via the government in China. Last year a friend of mine's family played host to a Chinese exchange student. She lived in a city near Beijing and her mom worked for the population control arm of the government. She told us that if you live out in the country in China they don't care if you have more than one kid because you need them to help work your farm, but if you live in the city (where most people do) and you have more than one kid you get a pretty hefty fine for doing so.



Yes they still have and i said if they even free it today Chinese peeps wouldn't be wanting to have lotsa kids and i support it, whole world needs to learn from lesson :2 cents:

Libertine 11-26-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD (Post 16585022)
I think unfortunately no matter what we do, people on welfare will drag all of us making moderate income on our own down to poverty in the name of helping take care of poor people.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

If you feel you're being dragged down to poverty, you're probably in the bottom 50% of income earners. A group that, as a whole, pays less than 5% of all income taxes.

Two thirds of income taxes are paid by the top 10% of income earners - and they're definitely not being dragged down to poverty. If anything, their share of total income is actually growing.

So if you're struggling, stop blaming others. The only way to have to pay more than what could be argued is more than your fair share is to be one of the top earners. If you're not among those, others are picking up your tab already.

In a way, it's funny how people like you always whine and bitch. It's never your own fault. If you were on welfare, you'd be whining about immigrants taking your job. If you were among the top earners, you'd be whining about the lower and middle classes not paying their fair share.

Want to avoid being dragged to poverty? Quit whining and start working harder.

BVF 11-26-2009 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16583487)
People already called Obama and the Democrats communist and talk about how evil "big government" is so of course something like forced birth control would just put those criticisms to rest. And even if the neo-con Obama haters would be for something like that, who is paying for this birth control? Certainly not the people so poor they are on welfare. So it's everyone else. And then the neo-con Obama haters would complain about that.

Hell I hate to see people who are on food stamps that smoke. How can you be too poor to feed yourself but have enough money for cigarettes? I also can't stand seeing people on food stamps that buy soda, chips, snack cakes etc etc., and expensive cuts of meat. They need to restrict what you can buy with food stamps.

Yes, one shouldn't be allowed to be eating the same fine cuts of meat that one who is working for their food should get.....It should go back to the days of government cheese.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123