50

Rednecks don't belong in the pornbiz

I don't care about the right of anyone other than what I want. I don't even care if your rub yourself with peanutbutter or stick your dick in a freezer.

I don't get off looking at fags parading around as if I was abnormal and out of place.

I don't think showcasing two men fucking to straight people is appropriate.

now that's just funny.

I'm pretty sure homosexuals don't get off on some bitch with big tits being paraded about in many GFY sigs either, but you don't see them bitching and moaning about it.

Can i just called you A s h c r o f t from now one?

pimpdog stop, i was trying not to jerk off tonight before i went out whore mongering

Like those pictures aren't turning you on even more!

Marty's probably cum in his pants 3 or 4 times by now. Seems he gets all excited when he gets attention and he's had enough for multiple orasams by now. Probably a neglected child.

this picture has prompted me to go nair my balls and ass... i currently have nair on them.... it feels good...

You're exactly right. Fags are sick freaks. Since when do people care what offends the deviants.
This is the way I see it. Fags are sick and strange. People like chodadog saying things like maybe fags would be offended by tits is just ridiculous. It assumes homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality. Of course it isn't. One being necessary to the very survival of humanity the other necessary only for getting off the sick deviants. Personally I don't care what fags do. But archer putting that shit in his sig and making every normal straight person see it makes him an asshole and worthy of ignore anyway.
So Marty just quit yer bitching and put the stupid fag on ignore like I did. You can bitch at him all you want you're not gonna change his diseased mind. Unless of course you're going for the dvd player then by all means continue on with this pointlessness.

dude why not leave the man alone shit. Grow up Archer is a good hearted guy and hasnt done anything to anyone for this to be happening.. :321GFY

Ahhhhh the world according to people like Marty: "If I like it then it's OK, if not then it's evil, should not be allowed and those involved have no rights, only I do."

Congrats Marty, you're in good company; Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and Trent Lott just to name a few.

Oh wait, you didn't say anything bad about African Americans....
... yet.

Moron.


farbie

Haha, too funny. You do understand, this is not about procreation. This is sex, purely for pleasure. I fail to see what a woman's tits in a banner has to do with procreation. Enlighten me, please?

And i already stated, that it would be unlikely for a homosexual to be offended by the sight of tits. I was using the analogy to point out how ridiculous the point of this thread was.

And while we're at it, how are homosexual sick? They have a different lifestyle choice. It's their right to fuck whoever they want, in whatever way they want. They're consenting adults. They're not hurting anybody.

I've made Archer's sig... I really don't see any problem with it,, he's promoting his biz like everybody does... does it break the gfy sig rules? NO! then why should it be banned?
Archer is a honest man , and working for him is a pleasure...

...this is just fucking pathetic I block half of you fuckwits signatures with my firewall - including yours Marty - mainly because they annoy me in some way. At least Archer's one doesn't flash, scroll or force a hideous number of pop ups to appear.

Get over it or block it - unless your real problem is his lifestyle not his signature, in which case may I direct you to a psychiatrist...

Please tell me if I'm wrong in saying this...but this is a webmasters board right?
Well WTF is your problem? We're all adults here...well most of us anyway.
I think we are allowed to be "perverted". You don't like archers sigs then block him and it's done.
Seriously your statement was really ignorant and it's bullshit.
:321GFY

I hate archers signatyre to - think gay sex is disgusting.
I want the freedom to say that.
But archer have the right to post whatever he want, so stop being a fucking crybaby - its only a signature

All sex is about procreation. Sex exists for procreation and that's the only reason sex exists. If we could drop seeds out of our asses and a child would sprout up there would be no sex or gender for that matter. People have sex without consciously wanting to procreate but that's natures little trick to get you to accidently knock up a chick.
That analogy makes an assumption that homo and hetero sex are equivalents. Let me make an analogy. There are people who are deathly terrified of clowns. We as a society don't make efforts to not offend such a small # of weirdos. That would be about the same as not posting pics of tits to avoid offending homosexuals. It's ridiculous.
Heterosexuality is the natural state of humanity. Having ten fingers and ten toes, an IQ above a certain level, the ability to think logically, having all your bones and muscles where they are supposed to be and function normally and of course an attraction to the opposite sex. When people deviate from the norm they have birth defects or retardation or mental illness. The only reason homosexuality is in a different catergory is the politically correct aspect. It doesn't mean they should be hated anymore than someone who is insane, retarded or deformed. This bit about it's just an equal lifestyle choice is ridiculous pc nonsense.
To answer the topic. No homosexual sigs should NOT be banned but as a courtesy it would be nice if we didn't have to look at pics of guys fucking everytime archer makes a post.

cant argue with that....
but personally Id like to see MORE anal mutilation and sodomy pics.. kind of brings back memories of when i was in a turkish prison.

Shit, the first night in a month when I go to bed early, y'all are all up in here having fun without me. :waaaaahh

I love threads like this. It helps me populate my IGNORE list.

To the idiots who are pent up about archer's sig: get. a. fucking. life. I love the idea that you're all squirmy and offended -- it makes my panties wet. :)

If you have such a problem with homosexuality, the solution is simple: get out of the porn business and go back to your safe little dreamworlds where everybody is straight and no one has any desires that make you at all uncomfortable.

It'd have to be a dreamworld, because there's no such place in cold, hard reality. Gay people, people with fetishes, people that like to do unspeakable things to themselves and other consenting adults -- we all share this world with you, babydoll. You can't get away from us, no matter how much you might like to. And I suggest you take a good long look at why you hate gay people so much -- does the idea of two men fucking the bejesus out of each other cause you to question your own precarious sense of masculinity and heterosexuality? Good. Yay. I hope archer's next sig is so horrible that it makes your poor widdle homophobic cock implode. It'd probably be the most action your cock would see in years...:1orglaugh

Next time Archer shows up at your home with a bottle of lube and some flowers, don't let him in.

If you don't like someone's signature, just put it on ignore. Simple

Just don't show Clowns...anything but fucking clowns...

great pics pimpdog... i have no strap on pics :sadcrying :waaaaahh


here's my contribution


http://www.oddfellow.net/getfed.jpg

Idiot calling for censorship, what else is new?

maybe it's time to change the theme of my sig

would something like this do?


http://www.oddfellow.net/loveit.jpg

IT IS TIME FOR TUB-GIRL!!!






















[IMG]http://www.sex-filez.com/gfy/*******.jpg[/IMG]

Marty--
Amazing how people only want to fight for freedom of speech, when they agree with what is being said.

Does the "ignore user" or the "hide signature" function not work for you?
If you can't get those to work, hmm.


Beyond that, archer's signature is legal. History is full of irony. As quiet pointed out, your signature wasn't legal. It was like a billboard, advertising another resource site...keep pushing, and you may end up being banned...

Also, if you think this is a good sort of "piss-makerting" thread, you are wrong.

I have signatures turned off.

Not because of archer, but because you crazy fuckers have signatures that would constantly lock my browser.

I WANNA SEE SOME ASS RIMMING PICS!!

ha ha nice.... good to see a women interested in male gay porn... especially when u consider how many guys get off on looking at lesbian porn... maybe archer has got some for you... sorry i cant help cause im not into gay porn :glugglug

man, this thread is just way outta hand...

Tub Girl is truly disgusting maybe someone should put that in their sig. LOL

I posted this thread http://www.gfyboard.com/showthread.p...threadid=87205 when I first did my signature asking if it was ok. You'll see that it was closed within minutes and funny enough, nobody contacted me to take it down (my ICQ and email are clearly displayed). Plus nobody has ever said anything about it before, even though they wouldn't hessitat telling someone who's was out of place by a pubic hairs width. You can see my response to those comments on the first page of this threat, plus it was changed the moment I found out.

And yes, we have permission to link to our resource site because 1. GFY doesn't have resources and 2. we asked.

If you have anything else to say, you have my details.

Why does this come up every fucking weekend? I guess that's when the amateurs come out. Give it a rest. You're in the wrong fucking business if you are a straight softie who can't stomach a bit of gay porn. You are way too delicate for this biz I'm afraid, Marty.

I do not deserve to be labled "amateur" or "delicate" by you.

Where the fuck do you get off?
Oh, that's right... you have the right to speak your mind, and quiet frankly, so do I, so :321GFY

Maybe not -- but you surely deserve the label STUPID!

At least I can write a simple sentence stupid.

"We may as well just give this fucking $$$ away!"

Yes, <b>you do</b>, by virtue of your position of being a pornographer advocating censorship.

You mean like...

At least I can write a simple sentence, stupid???

I just don't understand what the problem is. Archer is one of the cooler guys on the board. What are you afraid of? Turning gay if you have to keep looking at his sig? This is a very diverse board, he contributes to that fact.

O, and archer, if my sig offends you in any way let me know.

No - you're wrong. Reading through your posts in this thread it's impossible to reach any other conclusion. As posted above 'stupid' springs to mind too as do many other labels but those 3 get the point across well. :)

Some fine examples of your ability to write simple sentences...

"Oh, that's right... you have the right to speak your mind, and quiet frankly, so do I, so "

"Plus nobody has ever said anything about it before, even though they wouldn't hessitat telling someone who's was out of place by a pubic hairs width."

"I don't care about the right of anyone other than what I want."

"That is sick shit and I don't won't to have to share nor tollerate your reverted preferences. "

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://www.awwboard.com/images/smiles/roflmao.gif there are a few beauties. I'm not saying that I'm perfect, just that I'm not the only idiot around here.

Hell, it could be worse... I could be gay.

Is it going to make you gay? Or are you just afrais of it?

The mention of the signature is called irony . As for the things I have to say, I will say them here thank you very much.

I've seen your signature prior to the thread. It was always huge, and violated rules of the board. Quite a lot of people violate the rules of the board though. I'm sure Lensman & co. make too much money to be bothered spending all day catching signature cheaters, like this is a TGP or Link list. The point is that you didn't bother to even respect the rights of Lensman's board (with another resource site/webmaster board no less); yet, you want to restrict the rights of everyone on the board, by creating a new rule.

This is called irony.

Basically, it comes down to respecting the rights of others. Some behavior is not necessarily against the rules, because there may be no specific rule against it. However, there is common sense. Since we are all adults on this board, or at least claim to be, common sense should prevail. But, as my mother used to say, "common sense is not to common."

To speak of censorship of mainstream gay porn on a board where pictures of this type are accepted and posted is ridiculous. As a person who claims to be activily involved in marketing porn your motives are questionable. Essentially you are advocating censorship, and doing so in a way that is most distateful and homophobic. In addition, you have tools to stop all signatures or ignoring any user from showing up yourself , without need for any administrative assistence. Therefore, what is contained in other's users signatures and comments, does not restrict your individual rights. (Problem solved)

Your behaviour sir, is at the very root of censorship problems on the Internet. If you do not like it, do not look at it.

Why do you feel the need to restrict the speech of others?

You have all the right to your own opinion, and notice I didn't berate you for your views, as that would push me to your level. However, in this case, you do not have any say in the matter for others.

The only person who has that control is Lensman/Adult.com Team.

People can also have sex consciously <i>not</i> wanting to have children. Why are humans the only species that has sex for pleasure? Why did nature choose only us to play this little trick on? Sex is for pleasure and/or procreation. That is the very reason condoms, birth control pills, and any other form of contraception were invented.

You seem to have overlooked the audience that is actually seeing the signature. The majority of people on this forum are <i>not</i> offended by gay porn. So, by your own words:

<i>We as a forum don't make efforts to not offend such a small # of weirdos.</i>

You are the minority. You are the one that is deathly terrified of <i>clowns</i>.

Well SOME good came out of this thread... I run straight and gay sites and now I know that AWW is no place to do business (I assume you own it? Or just an employee?). It's a good thing to know your position.

And I'm sure a few people will make sure your sponsors understand your position as well. Your front page:
And I see buttons for WayPay, FlashCash, DialersWorld and others.

I don't trust pornographers who are homophobic, delicate and quick to advocate censorship of gay content. And I don't trust those who would advertise with them. And I know I am not alone in this amongst those who move traffic and select sponsors and services - particularly gay and mixed-bi traffic.

I might have to change some of my banner rotations over the holidays. Your "associates" and DirtyDollar, FlashCash and ARS - all buttons in your rotation - do they share your point of view? Perhaps they could post their positions in this thread - for everyone's clarification.

I'm thinking it might be a mistake for a webmaster resource site to take the position you have - it might have a negative effect on your site's sponsors. But I could be wrong. We'll have to let the marketplace decide and wait and see I guess.

ps. Well said IMX.