:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

No, just anti Obama, when I was the Mod here I wasn't allowed to post what I thought about Bush.
I believe in a balance of liberalism and Conservatism
It worked pretty good for us from 94 to 2000
Now we have the Great divider who was suppose to be the great uniter, yeah that worked, more people are talking about racism now than they have in years, the democrats and the GOP haven't been this polarized since I don't know when and it's not good for the country. But it's all Bushs fault, reminds me of some sissy that can't take the blame for his actions

If there is ever a war/attack/the sky is falling the gold isn't going to help you anything. The only thing you will be able to barter for is

Drinking Water and Food

Just because you hated bush doesn't mean you hold liberal views.

don't even come in here pretending you're some sort of middle of the road guy. I'm a leftist and would recognize liberal thought coming from you. I've seen ZERO. YOU ARE AS RIGHT WING AS THEY COME. WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE SMART ENOUGH TO EVEN KNOW WHAT RIGHT WING POLITICS EVEN MEAN. IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO DESCRIBE YOUR POLITICAL STANCES
the clinton years wasn't a balance of liberalism and conservatism. lol shit if anything it was a shift in many ways away from liberalism

nafta, welfare reform.. these things ring a bell? hardly leftist actions.

How is that Obama's fault? He isn't the one pushing the race issue. people like yourself are. And I highly disagree more people more people are talking about racism. racism has ALWAYS been a major issue in this country and I feel the racisms issue used to be way worse.

This I feel is a result of the repeal of the fairness doctrine. Now we have television and radio media being polarized politically more or less TELLING people what to think politically. It's become an op-ed commentary circus and will only continue to polarize the political landscape further.

Yes, they are being INVESTIGATED. I have a buddy that owns assisted living communities. Every time one of his patients complains, he is INVESTIGATED. The investigations have always shown that there is no problem. End of story

If they are actually CONVICTED of something, and Glenn Beck continues to have them on as a sponsor, then that means something, and I would then agree with your 1 + 1 silliness.... until then, it doesn't matter to me.

...or perhaps we should decide that if someone is being INVESTIGATED, then they are guilty, because they are being investigated???



Interesting take on things you have there. I hope you are never investigated for anything, since that will mean you must be guilty.



.

.

Never said it did, only that I couldn't comment
I'm a strong supporter of separation of church and state, and equality of it's citizens, to the point where things like the NAACP or any group that is based on race is wrong
Welfare reform was needed, it was a run away bus and NAFTA, I've spoke out against NAFTA on several occasions, I believe in free trade and having NAFTA ties the hands of free trade because it puts the American employers up against the cheap labor of countries like Mexico and China
I don't understand racism, I was never around it as a kid, growing up in a small town with a lot of Mexicans for friends and learning some Spanish in the 6th grade. Michelle Obama speaking at the NAACP and the next day, the NAACP calling out the Tea Party as racist, the whole democratic party calling them racist as a way to discredit them. Obama as the head of the democratic party should have said something.
Obama's constant using the power of the democratic held house and senate to get things passed and disregarding anything asked from the GOP and then making fun of them after he got what he wanted, that's what I meant about being a divider, he's polarized the nation in things like that.
Obama praised getting the pass and go passed
Yet he called the GOP the party of NO when the GOP wanted the Unemployment funded, thats an example
the Fairness doctrine would have put the FCC in charge of the news, I don't think that's the way to go. Until FOX news came around, all news outlets were liberal, it gave the liberals in office an unfair advantage by always reporting in their favor and left out news that was unfavorable. The fairness doctrine was brought out by the democrats because of people like Rush Limbaugh. You probably don't like him, I don't listen to him, but Obama's signature is on a letter asking that his employer take him off the air. Now with Fox news, we get both sides, I watch ABC in the morning and Fox in the evening,and I read online for my news.

Obama tried to censor Fox news, did not invite them to news conferences, wouldn't give interviews to them, he changed later from pressure from other news agencies, this is what polarizes the nation

noticed drudge pushes alex jones now. says a lot.