GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   No more Middle Men? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=983022)

Semi-Retired-Dave 08-19-2010 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony299 (Post 17428476)
The people vs larry flynt and boogie nights two amazing films ,amazing performances and at the box office they were duds. People dont want to watch movies about porn.

People don't want to watch a movie about porn, they want to watch porn. :thumbsup
Plus, times are hard, so people want to take their spouses, family, kids to the movies. This is something you would go see with a buddy.

tony286 08-19-2010 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberAge-Dave (Post 17428487)
People don't want to watch a movie about porn, they want to watch porn. :thumbsup
Plus, times are hard, so people want to take their spouses, family, kids to the movies. This is something you would go see with a buddy.

you are right:thumbsup

directfiesta 08-19-2010 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Varius (Post 17427828)
They will make profit. You guys are forgetting selling the pay-cable rights to someone like SHO or HBO and the OnDemand orders. :2 cents:

lol... you obviously never been in that business ... I did . Already posted that 6 million units needs to be sold to barely break even ... as for ppv-ondemand-cable, many other titles are trying to get in those spots .. no one will rush to the doors to book that film.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 08-19-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony299 (Post 17428476)
The people vs larry flynt and boogie nights two amazing films ,amazing performances and at the box office they were duds. People dont want to watch movies about porn.

People vs Larry Flynt grossed over $20 million domestically, and Boogie Nights grossed over $26 million at the box office domestically (and over $43 million internationally).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 17428047)
I think the topic is still interesting enough, and it could make a great HBO or SHO series with good writers. Did the writer just suck? Was the content too "porn" for mainstream to accept?

The creators (Malick, et al) originally peddled "Middle Men" to cable as a series, but when there were no takers, they decided to try and make it as a film.

Even with the "more traffic than God", traffic from Mansef / Manwin tube sites (built upon stolen content), it bombed big time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Varius (Post 17427828)
They will make profit. You guys are forgetting selling the pay-cable rights to someone like SHO or HBO and the OnDemand orders. :2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagcam (Post 17428463)
A movie with this subject matter was never going to be a box office smash at the cinema. I am surprised at how many people are surprised by this.

As many have said before me, it was always going to make most of its money through other channels.

The money that cable companies pay for a movie is largely based upon it's box office performance. The cable companies previously rejected "Middle Man" as a cable project. How much do you really think they are going to pay for it now? :1orglaugh

Anyway you cut it, "Middle Men" was a dismal flop, and will most likely have to be sold as a loss leader...

As the Distributor, Paramount will likely get a lion's share of the ancillary markets, as paltry as that may be, given the poor box office performance numbers.

One more factor to consider is that even box office bonanza movies, only make back about what they make during their theatrical release through the various other markets (DVD, VOD, Cable, etc).

At this point, "Middle Men" has grossed less than $700k (that's not counting the ad budget, or deducting Paramount's distributor share, or even the theater's share), so any chance of this movie breaking even at this point appears to be a total pipe dream.

Not too worry though, because Middle Men is sure to make ~$20 more tonight, because I am heading out to see it shortly, since it will not be playing anywhere near me tomorrow, or much of anywhere for that matter. :1orglaugh

I'll post my review tomorrow... :thumbsup

ADG

xNetworx 08-19-2010 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17428504)
People vs Larry Flynt grossed over $20 million domestically, and Boogie Nights grossed over $26 million at the box office domestically (and over $43 million internationally).



The creators (Malick, et al) originally peddled "Middle Men" to cable as a series, but when there were no takers, they decided to try and make it as a film.

Even with the "more traffic than God", traffic from Mansef / Manwin tube sites (built upon stolen content), it bombed big time.





The money that cable companies pay for a movie is largely based upon it's box office performance. The cable companies previously rejected "Middle Man" as a cable project. How much do you really think they are going to pay for it now? :1orglaugh

Anyway you cut it, "Middle Men" was a dismal flop, and will most likely have to be sold as a loss leader...

As the Distributor, Paramount will likely get a lion's share of the ancillary markets, as paltry as that may be, given the poor box office performance numbers.

One more factor to consider is that even box office bonanza movies, only make back about what they make during their theatrical release through the various other markets (DVD, VOD, Cable, etc).

At this point, "Middle Men" has grossed less than $700k (that's not counting the ad budget, or deducting Paramount's distributor share, or even the theater's share), so any chance of this movie breaking even at this point appears to be a total pipe dream.

Not too worry though, because Middle Men is sure to make ~$20 more tonight, because I am heading out to see it shortly, since it will not be playing anywhere near me tomorrow, or much of anywhere for that matter. :1orglaugh

I'll post my review tomorrow... :thumbsup

ADG

Why do you have such a hard-on to bash this film? Serious question.

dyna mo 08-19-2010 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17428156)

i see. so mallick is a drug dealer who wants to hang out with owen wilson. makes sense.

FrozenJag 08-19-2010 10:13 PM

Wow, the guys laughing at my concern truly are idiots. Probably the same guys sending sobv sales still thinking they'll get paid.

I don't live on gfy but it was my understanding epass owner funded the movie, if he goes broke what keeps him from cleaning out one of hisotherbusinesses holding millions and disapearing? It's not like their a real bank with insurance.

Fucking morons wow. Then again, if I had five dollars in my account I probably wouldn't be worried either.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 08-20-2010 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17428539)
i see. so mallick is a drug dealer who wants to hang out with owen wilson. makes sense.

I never inferred that Mallick was/is a drug dealer. How did you deduce that, or do you know something about him that I don't? :winkwink:

BTW, Owen Wilson wasn't even in the movie, genius (maybe it would have faired better at the box office if he was). :1orglaugh

Anyway, I just got back home a little while ago from seeing "Middle Men". I'll post my review later today after I get some sleep...

ADG

Shap 08-20-2010 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 17428073)
Lol, the movie was loosely based around Epass owner, other than that there is no correlation.

The reason he said that is because the guy who funded and produced the movie owns epass.

Shap 08-20-2010 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrozenJag (Post 17428542)
Wow, the guys laughing at my concern truly are idiots. Probably the same guys sending sobv sales still thinking they'll get paid.

I don't live on gfy but it was my understanding epass owner funded the movie, if he goes broke what keeps him from cleaning out one of hisotherbusinesses holding millions and disapearing? It's not like their a real bank with insurance.

Fucking morons wow. Then again, if I had five dollars in my account I probably wouldn't be worried either.

I got what you were saying :)

My understanding is Chris can easily handle the cost of the movie. Of course you never know what the true situation is. but from everything I've heard it won't put him out of business.

Sly 08-20-2010 06:58 AM

I saw the trailer several times on TV, and to be completely honest... not only did the movie look dull and cliché, I had no idea what the movie was even supposed to be about. Some good named actors, yes, including one of my favorites: Ribisi. But aside from that... I saw guys wearing suits, walking off an airplane, and throwing money into the air. What about that makes me want to shell out $10, in the summer, to go watch this? Nothing really.

From reading little notes here on the board about the movie... I still don't even know what it's supposed to be about. Porn? Scamming porn? Getting rich on the Internet?

This isn't hating. Just honest comments. I wish it would have went better for them, pretty cool for giving it a shot though, I'll give them that.

Dirty Lord 08-20-2010 07:00 AM

i dont know, for sure

candyflip 08-20-2010 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 17428500)
lol... you obviously never been in that business ... I did . Already posted that 6 million units needs to be sold to barely break even ... as for ppv-ondemand-cable, many other titles are trying to get in those spots .. no one will rush to the doors to book that film.

Didn't he just post the other day about a big movie investment opportunity?

FrozenJag 08-20-2010 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 17429059)
I got what you were saying :)

My understanding is Chris can easily handle the cost of the movie. Of course you never know what the true situation is. but from everything I've heard it won't put him out of business.

Thanks for the info Shap. I knew surely I wasnt the only one capable of thinking outside the box and having alot to loose. For all I knew this movie could break him. Good to know he atleast allegedly is multi multi.

tony286 08-20-2010 08:13 AM

"People vs Larry Flynt grossed over $20 million domestically, and Boogie Nights grossed over $26 million at the box office domestically (and over $43 million internationally)."

When considering what it cost to make them they were flops not train wrecks but flops.

Mutt 08-20-2010 08:22 AM

i was going to give him kudos for getting the movie made and a distribution deal, the odds against getting a theatrical movie made and produced are astronomical. studios and production companies have hundreds of scripts in development, only a tiny fraction ever make it to production. of those that do get made, the large majority are failures - movie business is all about the blockbuster these days though hitting some solid doubles is profitable.

if he footed the bill for the entire film, what a waste and a total conceit. that money could have gone to so many better things, give it to a hospital, get a clinic or floor name after you or somebody you love(d), fund a summer camp for sick kids ...

Thoroughbred horse industry and the movie industry survive on people with too much money and too much vanity.

dyna mo 08-20-2010 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17428729)
I never inferred that Mallick was/is a drug dealer.

aww come on now adg, don't woos out-stand your ground. you posted this


Quote:

Movie Execs Charged in Money-Laundering Case

Federal prosecutors say Limelight Films was a front in international drug smuggling.
July 20, 2006|Andrew Blankstein and Richard Winton, Times Staff Writers
Limelight Films seemed from the outside like so many upstart production companies in Hollywood: It had a Sunset Boulevard address, a connection to Tinseltown royalty and deals to distribute a small slate of low-budget films.

But federal authorities have alleged that the film corporation was a front for an international drug-smuggling and money-laundering operation stretching from Los Angeles to Switzerland.

stigation dubbed "Operation Director's Cut."

D'Esclavelles and De Basseville were arrested in Arlington, Va., and charged with conspiracy to distribute Ecstasy.

Authorities said they learned about Limelight from an informant and set up a sting operation in which agents with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration posed as Ecstasy buyers working for South American drug dealers.

The criminal complaint alleges that Limelight executives laundered $300,000 through the film company for the undercover agents. The arrests followed numerous meetings between the agents and Limelight executives, who allegedly promised to arrange the sale of half a million Ecstasy tablets, according to court documents.

ADG[/QUOTE]

:)

Caligari 08-20-2010 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony299 (Post 17429269)
"People vs Larry Flynt grossed over $20 million domestically, and Boogie Nights grossed over $26 million at the box office domestically (and over $43 million internationally)."

When considering what it cost to make them they were flops not train wrecks but flops.

Boogie Nights - Budget, $15 million. Gross 43 million. Not fantastic but definitely not a flop.

Caligari 08-20-2010 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17428504)
The creators (Malick, et al) originally peddled "Middle Men" to cable as a series, but when there were no takers, they decided to try and make it as a film.

Whats really interesting is that HBO IS MAKING a series about the porn biz, xbiz has a story on it.

Varius 08-20-2010 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 17429215)
Didn't he just post the other day about a big movie investment opportunity?

Indeed I did, and that film project has almost broken-even already just due to Foreign Sales (Distribution) and New Mexico Tax Break.

That project isn't aiming for huge box office success,either; it's not that kind of film. It's aiming for awards and will make money through other channels.

For the comment above regarding SHO/HBO only paying a lot for box office hits, that's false. They pay when they feel a film fits their audience/genre and especially when they get exclusivity to it. They are premium paid channels, not network TV; so they can afford to do this as long as they have faith the film is something their subscribers will want to see.

tony286 08-20-2010 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari (Post 17429392)
Boogie Nights - Budget, $15 million. Gross 43 million. Not fantastic but definitely not a flop.

US box office was nothing to write home about especially when you consider it was an amazing film with great performances. I forgot what article I read but it was considered a flop at the box office. Then you add dvd and int it didnt do bad.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 08-20-2010 10:27 AM

With only $20mil invested, they will still turn a profit, just not a huge one.

NinjaSteve 08-20-2010 11:07 AM

I thought the trailer looked sweet.

epitome 08-20-2010 11:32 AM

I had no idea this thread would turn out this way. I thought a few predictable trolls would jump in but WOW.

Anyway, no solid plans for tonight ... had kept August 20th reserved for Middle Men.

Roald 08-20-2010 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 17429636)
With only $20mil invested, they will still turn a profit, just not a huge one.

Meh.....

woj 08-20-2010 12:48 PM

Movies are either hits or flops, barely turning a profit = flop... most of the profit will go to investors and other "middle men" (no pun intended, heh)... producer invested ton of his own $$, spent years chasing around it, making deals etc, just to pretty much break even...

it's really a shame though, seemed like a decent flick, had potential to be a hit....

PornMD 08-20-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 17430013)
Movies are either hits or flops, barely turning a profit = flop... most of the profit will go to investors and other "middle men" (no pun intended, heh)... producer invested ton of his own $$, spent years chasing around it, making deals etc, just to pretty much break even...

it's really a shame though, seemed like a decent flick, had potential to be a hit....

Yea, people seem to forget the value of the time spent too. Months/years of time invested by all involved for a little profit isn't success.

That said, I agree that it's a shame. It looks more interesting than most of the shit playing, so my fascination with this is more that it's doing as poorly as it is given what it is.

Kenny B! 08-20-2010 01:28 PM

I saw the movie and it's was great, way better than movies that make tens of millions. As I see it the main reason for the dismal numbers is the lack of promotion. I don’t know if Luke Wilson is promoting it on the talk show circuit or if there were many press junkets, but it was way better than Stallons flick the expendables which that had tons of promotion and many huge names. I guess the big screen is a lot like the internet, you have the traffic you’ll make the conversions no matter what the content is.

babymaker 08-20-2010 01:35 PM

yea no fucking promotion why?? I didnt see one newpaper ad and one 10 sec tv spot i almost missed.

dyna mo 08-20-2010 01:38 PM

they promoted the fuck out of it here in l.a.

PornMD 08-20-2010 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babymaker (Post 17430138)
yea no fucking promotion why?? I didnt see one newpaper ad and one 10 sec tv spot i almost missed.

Depends on the channels I guess. I've seen previews for it at least a dozen times or so on TV. Forget if it was on Spike or Fox or what.

Semi-Retired-Dave 08-20-2010 01:40 PM

Standard procedure is...If your movie cost 20 Million to make, you need to put half of it in Promotion. So I don't think 10 Million more went into P & A (Print and advertising)

That could have been the problem.

Semi-Retired-Dave 08-20-2010 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17430145)
they promoted the fuck out of it here in l.a.

Especially in Chatsworth. :1orglaugh

CYF 08-20-2010 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17430145)
they promoted the fuck out of it here in l.a.

I saw commercials all the time here and it's no where to be found in theaters.

dyna mo 08-20-2010 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberAge-Dave (Post 17430153)
Especially in Chatsworth. :1orglaugh

go figure! lolz

off topic, i received your wife's book in the mail today, looking forward to reading it this weekend. :)

Semi-Retired-Dave 08-20-2010 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17430172)
go figure! lolz

off topic, i received your wife's book in the mail today, looking forward to reading it this weekend. :)

Damn that was Fast. :thumbsup
If you have any questions about the business whatsoever, I can give you her email address.
She used to own an Agency, Modeling and Commercial with over 300 People on her Roster.

Just not enough time in the day for her with everything she has going on.

Off Topic,
I may go for a ride tomorrow, maybe head towards the beach area for a drink with a buddy that lives out that way. Let me know.

Riffhard 08-20-2010 01:55 PM

Anyone know how Zack and Miri make a Porno did?

docputer 08-20-2010 01:58 PM

Moviefone shows it in 2 theaters in Plano Texas, about a 10 hour drive from where I live.

dyna mo 08-20-2010 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberAge-Dave (Post 17430179)
Damn that was Fast. :thumbsup
If you have any questions about the business whatsoever, I can give you her email address.
She used to own an Agency, Modeling and Commercial with over 300 People on her Roster.

Just not enough time in the day for her with everything she has going on.

Off Topic,
I may go for a ride tomorrow, maybe head towards the beach area for a drink with a buddy that lives out that way. Let me know.

amazon prime ftw! i hope i have some questions eh, so that would be cool.

tomorrow sounds cool, holler at me with the details if you go.

we went to roscoe's bike nite last nite, it was outlaw m/c nite i guess, the mongols were there and when it came time for us to leave, one of em had his bike parked in front of mine and got pissed when i asked him nicely to move it. hah. he was drunk and almost dropped it on about 3 other bikes. close call!

Semi-Retired-Dave 08-20-2010 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17430192)
amazon prime ftw! i hope i have some questions eh, so that would be cool.

tomorrow sounds cool, holler at me with the details if you go.

we went to roscoe's bike nite last nite, it was outlaw m/c nite i guess, the mongols were there and when it came time for us to leave, one of em had his bike parked in front of mine and got pissed when i asked him nicely to move it. hah. he was drunk and almost dropped it on about 3 other bikes. close call!

That's a funny and scary story. :1orglaugh
Trying to find your email, can you send me an email with it. I'll send you details. Maybe I should hit up Baddog too, if he has any miles left on it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123