GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News BREAKING! Vote Padding Found in Wisconsin, Trumps "lead" shrinks by 18% (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1231126)

Bladewire 11-26-2016 02:47 PM

BREAKING! Vote Padding Found in Wisconsin, Trumps "lead" shrinks by 18%
 
Fascinating that Only Trumps numbers shrink by 18% isn't it?

"If this pattern remains consistent across the state, it's feasible ? though unclear how likely ? that Clinton could end up on top in the state."

----------

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes

Earlier today we reported that three precincts in the Wisconsin county of Outagamie had revised their vote totals downward for Donald Trump by more than a thousand votes combined, with local officials insisting to their local ABC News affiliate that it was a mere arithmetic error. But as more revisions come in throughout the state, a total of nearly five thousand Trump votes in Wisconsin have now been taken off the official board because they apparently never existed to begin with.

At the end of election night the New York Times reported that Donald Trump had won the state of Wisconsin with a total of 1,409,467 votes, giving him a winning margin of 27,257 votes over Hillary Clinton?s total of 1,382,210. These numbers were based on what the individual counties and precincts were reporting that night. But now seventeen days later, based on various Wisconsin precincts revising their own totals, Dave Wasserman of the respected Cook Political Report has updated the totals. Donald Trump now has 1,404,536 total votes in Wisconsin, while Hillary Clinton now has 1,382,011 total votes.

Two things immediately jump out, as first spotted by music critic Dave Greenwald. The first is that, even ahead of the forthcoming recount in Wisconsin, Donald Trump?s lead has already shrunk to just 22,525 votes. That means 18% of his ?lead? has already vanished, based on precincts catching some of their own incorrect numbers, and internet gawkers catching others. But the second thing that jumps out is that the revisions have served to erase thousands of votes from Trump, while affirming that Clinton?s vote total was essentially correct to begin with.

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes - Palmer Report

Report: Trump's Margin In Wisconsin Shrinks By Thousands Of Votes Ahead Of Recount

Bladewire 11-26-2016 03:17 PM

"An election fraud complaint has been filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission after it was uncovered that more people voted in the presidential race than the total number of votes in 4 precincts in Wisconsin."

Barry-xlovecam 11-26-2016 03:35 PM

OH NOES!

https://s17.postimg.org/n8ihnnyfj/pouting_trump.jpg

Never ending drama ...

AMDWarrior 11-26-2016 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21333550)
Fascinating that Only Trumps numbers shrink by 18% isn't it?

"If this pattern remains consistent across the state, it's feasible ? though unclear how likely ? that Clinton could end up on top in the state."

----------

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes

Earlier today we reported that three precincts in the Wisconsin county of Outagamie had revised their vote totals downward for Donald Trump by more than a thousand votes combined, with local officials insisting to their local ABC News affiliate that it was a mere arithmetic error. But as more revisions come in throughout the state, a total of nearly five thousand Trump votes in Wisconsin have now been taken off the official board because they apparently never existed to begin with.

At the end of election night the New York Times reported that Donald Trump had won the state of Wisconsin with a total of 1,409,467 votes, giving him a winning margin of 27,257 votes over Hillary Clinton?s total of 1,382,210. These numbers were based on what the individual counties and precincts were reporting that night. But now seventeen days later, based on various Wisconsin precincts revising their own totals, Dave Wasserman of the respected Cook Political Report has updated the totals. Donald Trump now has 1,404,536 total votes in Wisconsin, while Hillary Clinton now has 1,382,011 total votes.

Two things immediately jump out, as first spotted by music critic Dave Greenwald. The first is that, even ahead of the forthcoming recount in Wisconsin, Donald Trump?s lead has already shrunk to just 22,525 votes. That means 18% of his ?lead? has already vanished, based on precincts catching some of their own incorrect numbers, and internet gawkers catching others. But the second thing that jumps out is that the revisions have served to erase thousands of votes from Trump, while affirming that Clinton?s vote total was essentially correct to begin with.

Election Fraud Complaint Filed As More People Voted Than Total Voters In 4 Wisconsin Precincts

Ahead of recount, Wisconsin has already wiped out 5,000 imaginary Donald Trump votes - Palmer Report

Report: Trump's Margin In Wisconsin Shrinks By Thousands Of Votes Ahead Of Recount



LOL give it up pussy.. your little criminal bitch is done.

Bladewire 11-26-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AMDWarrior (Post 21333631)
LOL give it up pussy.. your little criminal bitch is done.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :321GFY

mineistaken 11-26-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21333550)
Fascinating that Only Trumps numbers shrink by 18% isn't it?

trump numbers shrink by 18% or lead shrink by 18%?
Twisting again?

EddyTheDog 11-26-2016 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333664)
trump numbers shrink by 18% or lead shrink by 18%?
Twisting again?

Is it a good thing either way?..

mineistaken 11-26-2016 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21333667)
Is it a good thing either way?..

3 points lead shrinking by 18% would make it 2.4 points lead.

kane 11-26-2016 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333670)
3 points lead shrinking by 18% would make it 2.4 points lead.

Does the amount really matter? If we are finding flaws (or fraud) in the voting system shouldn't it be brought to light even if it is small?

mineistaken 11-26-2016 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21333676)
Does the amount really matter? If we are finding flaws (or fraud) in the voting system shouldn't it be brought to light even if it is small?

Of course. Lets not make it sound as if it is guaranteed fraud by Trump camp though. :1orglaugh
I am sure if yiu recounted all states you would find lead shrinking to both sides.

EddyTheDog 11-26-2016 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333670)
3 points lead shrinking by 18% would make it 2.4 points lead.

That's still 1000's of votes - You have to ask why - This is not a poll - There should be zero margin of error...

Forget this election - It's over - However, the next election you could forgive people for asking 'Why bother?'....

Bladewire 11-26-2016 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333682)
Of course. Lets not make it sound as if it is guaranteed fraud by Trump camp though.

Right because Trumplestiltskin was just forced to personally pay off a $25,000,000 federal class action fraud case against him brought by hundreds of ripped off citizen. Trump has been caught doing fraudulent activities many times in the past and had to payout big $$$, but the Russian Mineistaken doesn't want us to use Trumplestiltskins past behavior as a predictor of his future behavior.

kane 11-26-2016 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21333682)
Of course. Lets not make it sound as if it is guaranteed fraud by Trump camp though. :1orglaugh
I am sure if yiu recounted all states you would find lead shrinking to both sides.

I'm reserving judgment until the investigation is finished. It just sounded like you were dismissing it because it ultimately isn't that many votes or that big of a percentage of the votes. Of course, I could have mistook what you read.

In the end, if there appears to be fraud from either party it should be delt with accordingly.

Rochard 11-26-2016 05:02 PM

If any of this was true, it would be front page on all of the major news sites - not on crappy biased site I've never heard of.

MiamiBoyz 11-26-2016 05:23 PM

http://67.media.tumblr.com/73a3aead0...epc3o1_400.gif

Bladewire 11-26-2016 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 21333808)

Glad to see you're getting out of the house :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Barry-xlovecam 11-26-2016 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21333772)
If any of this was true, it would be front page on all of the major news sites - not on crappy biased site I've never heard of.

If it's cooked news this is Internet drama at its finest :OP

Bladewire 11-26-2016 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21333772)
If any of this was true, it would be front page on all of the major news sites - not on crappy biased site I've never heard of.

They're saving it for maximum impact Monday.

BTW the media has anointed Trump. Do you think they want to pause/reverse and take back all the ass kissing/fence mending they've done the last couple weeks? Nope.

You can see by hosts & comentators reactions they're fighting Stein and trying to drag Clinton into it to demonize her & invalidate the recount process.

Grapesoda 11-26-2016 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21333667)
Is it a good thing either way?..

none of any of this happened. check the real news

Bladewire 11-26-2016 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 21334045)
none of any of this happened. check the real news

The Wisconsin local news & national news, and fraud report, happened, as linked. Sucks for Trumplestiltskin.

Rochard 11-27-2016 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21333835)
They're saving it for maximum impact Monday.

BTW the media has anointed Trump. Do you think they want to pause/reverse and take back all the ass kissing/fence mending they've done the last couple weeks? Nope.

You can see by hosts & comentators reactions they're fighting Stein and trying to drag Clinton into it to demonize her & invalidate the recount process.

I hate Trump with a passion, but I also believe in being both realistic and honest.

If you are repeating nonsense from heavily biased websites, all you really doing is spreading fake news. I want to believe this as much as the next person, but the media isn't going to sit on this until Monday for "maximum impact". The media doesn't want to sit on news but instead each outlet wants to be the first to report it.

We'll see next week if there is any truth to this.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21334231)
the media isn't going to sit on this until Monday for "maximum impact". The media doesn't want to sit on news but instead each outlet wants to be the first to report it.

Right, the media never sits on a story for maximum impact, especially on Thanksgiving/black Friday weekend when everyone is focussed on family/traveling & shopping.

I lived with, & was in a relationship with, a TV newscaster for 2 1/2 years and know a little about stories having legs when to drop etc.

When I post news here before it drops, with links, it's because I know where to look ,and how, for direct source.

Anyway, the last thing the media wants to do is backtrack after kissing Trumps ass the last 2 weeks so we'll see, they're already trying to drag Clinton unti it and demonize her, again.

EddyTheDog 11-27-2016 03:25 AM

Trump dismisses Wisconsin recount drive as 'scam' - BBC News

Barry-xlovecam 11-27-2016 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21334300)

There you go, a blanket denial by the scammer-in-chief. Someone with first hand knowledge :1orglaugh

The inmates are running amok in the asylum.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 10:09 AM

WBAY - Discrepancies in unofficial Outagamie County election results explained - November 22, 2016

Stories like this break at the local affiliate and the national news decides whether to, and when, to push it national.

CaptainHowdy 11-27-2016 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 21333808)

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...

TheSquealer 11-27-2016 12:28 PM

So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

xKingx 11-27-2016 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Bladewire 11-27-2016 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

I agree with voters having ID's to vote seems common sense to me. I've always said that.

This whole election was based on hacks of various voter databases, DNC servers and Clinton campaign members, etc.

Trump was yelling that the election is rigged and he won't accept results if he lost BEFORE anyone even voted.

2 weeks after results scientists & processors approached The Green party with data suggesting anomalies. The Green party put forth the recount initiative, Hillary Clinton did not.

Trump is trying to put the grassroots recount on Clinton and she had nothing to do with it.

Typical Trump lying his ass off and misrepresenting while tweeting like a maniac this morning blaming Clinton. Disgusting.

NewNick 11-27-2016 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

The worst losers ???

Dont forget your boy Trumpy stated that he would only accept the legitamacy of the vote if he won FFS !!!

He stated over and over again that everyone was being mean to him, rigging the vote, and stealing the election. He was more than happy to say in advance that he would not take defeat graciously, and y'all screamed the house down cos Trumpy can do no wrong.

Dont you think your flash new Emperor kind of set the tone here ???

jsmih 11-27-2016 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21335023)
So,.... when its in your best interest to deny election fraud and thus deny the need for government issued id's to vote, insisting its just too damn hard for a black person or Hispanic to get an ID, you insist (democrats/liberals) that there is no such thing as election fraud.

When its in your interest to prove election fraud exists because you lost and election, suddenly election fraud is a huge problem?

I guess we need voters to have government issued IDs.... right?

Let's take every step necessary to prevent any kind of election fraud. I'm cool with that. Conservatives have been saying this for years to you fucking morons..... but of course, that means that you'll lose a lot of votes by simply doing the right thing.

Democrats/Liberals are the worst fucking losers ever.

Solution depends on what type of fraud, if any, is found. IDs may work for real people voting who are not eligible, but wouldn't do anything to solve malicious voting machine software.

xKingx 11-27-2016 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsmih (Post 21335053)
Solution depends on what type of fraud, if any, is found. IDs may work for real people voting who are not eligible, but wouldn't do anything to solve malicious voting machine software.

True IDs won't work for hacking, but you can damn be sure Hillary wouldn't of won the popular vote without all the illegals voting for her :winkwink:

Bladewire 11-27-2016 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xKingx (Post 21335074)
True IDs won't work for hacking, but you can damn be sure Hillary wouldn't of won the popular vote without all the illegals voting for her :winkwink:

Trump "won" you don't have to perpetuate that lie anymore

DBS.US 11-27-2016 01:01 PM

Trump said it was fixed, live with it:2 cents:

imabro 11-27-2016 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21334246)
Right, the media never sits on a story for maximum impact, especially on Thanksgiving/black Friday weekend when everyone is focussed on family/traveling & shopping.

I lived with, & was in a relationship with, a TV newscaster for 2 1/2 years and know a little about stories having legs when to drop etc.

When I post news here before it drops, with links, it's because I know where to look ,and how, for direct source.

Anyway, the last thing the media wants to do is backtrack after kissing Trumps ass the last 2 weeks so we'll see, they're already trying to drag Clinton unti it and demonize her, again.

Which explains why you called Trump winning ... oh, wait.

imabro 11-27-2016 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21335038)
I agree with voters having ID's to vote seems common sense to me. I've always said that.

This whole election was based on hacks of various voter databases, DNC servers and Clinton campaign members, etc.

Trump was yelling that the election is rigged and he won't accept results if he lost BEFORE anyone even voted.

2 weeks after results scientists & processors approached The Green party with data suggesting anomalies. The Green party put forth the recount initiative, Hillary Clinton did not.

Trump is trying to put the grassroots recount on Clinton and she had nothing to do with it.

Typical Trump lying his ass off and misrepresenting while tweeting like a maniac this morning blaming Clinton. Disgusting.

You love to twist the facts.

noshit 11-27-2016 01:44 PM

I wonder if Jill Stein will coincidentally be purchasing a brand new Audi and a mansion on the beach, like Bernie Sanders

.

rogueteens 11-27-2016 01:52 PM

doesn't America find voting fraud in every election? We have it here too but it only happens in "Asian" areas so that's allowed.

Bladewire 11-27-2016 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21335122)
Which explains why you called Trump winning ... oh, wait.

You're an idiot fake nick coward

Bladewire 11-27-2016 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21335128)
You love to twist the facts.

You're an idiot


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123