Free Speech Responds to Government Brief in 2257 Lawsuit - GoFuckYourself.com

Redrob · 06-02-2011, 07:23 PM

From Mark Kernes at AVN:

Attorneys Murray and Baumgardner refute all DOJ arguments to uphold lawsuit's dismissal.

Quote:

PHILADELPHIA, Pa.?Attorneys for Free Speech Coalition and 14 other plaintiffs today filed their reply brief to the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) brief urging the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to uphold Judge Michael Baylson's dismissal of FSC's lawsuit targeting the federal recordkeeping and labeling law, 18 U.S.C. §2257. In short, attorneys J. Michael Murray and Lorraine R. Baumgardner, with assistance from attorney Reed Lee, successfully refute every one of the DOJ's arguments, often pointing out that the government attorneys have taken contradictory positions on several key points.

Link to AVN article

No Fear, Just Knowledge!

Redrob · 06-02-2011, 09:38 PM

A great read!

The brief really addresses issues that have been glossed over by the government in the past.

Vendzilla · 06-02-2011, 09:44 PM

be interesting if the brief gets traction over the long run

Barry-xlovecam · 06-02-2011, 10:20 PM

See No. 06-3822 Connection Distributing Co. et al. v. Holder (2009) PDF

The 6th Appellate court overturned its own tribunal in an En Banc hearing of the Appeal on many of these same issues.

See what happens ...

.

Redrob · 06-03-2011, 07:18 AM

Morning bump for a good read with your coffee.

davecummings · 06-03-2011, 07:40 AM

It seems to me that AVN Legal writer Mark Kernes ALWAYS provides understandable and sage coverage of legal matters for those of us who don't have much legal experience.

u-Bob · 06-03-2011, 07:43 AM

interesting

06-02-2011, 09:44 PM	#3
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,200	be interesting if the brief gets traction over the long run __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

06-02-2011, 10:20 PM	#4
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	See No. 06-3822 Connection Distributing Co. et al. v. Holder (2009) PDF The 6th Appellate court overturned its own tribunal in an *En Banc* hearing of the Appeal on many of these same issues. See what happens ... .

06-03-2011, 07:40 AM	#6
davecummings Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,922	It seems to me that AVN Legal writer Mark Kernes ALWAYS provides understandable and sage coverage of legal matters for those of us who don't have much legal experience. __________________ Dave Cummings www.davecummings.com www.davecummings.tv San Diego Email--- [email protected]

06-02-2011, 09:38 PM	#2
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	A great read! The brief really addresses issues that have been glossed over by the government in the past.

06-03-2011, 07:18 AM	#5
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	Morning bump for a good read with your coffee.

06-03-2011, 07:43 AM	#7
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	interesting