![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Utopia
Posts: 6,482
|
Testing server load capacity
Is there a tool to test a new server for load capacity?
We're moving servers, but before making the final switch, we'd like to 'hammer' it with some requests to see it it can cope. I know i saw tools before, but i forgot where. You know of, or have such tool(s)?
__________________
seks.ai for sale - ping me |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 272
|
google.nl/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_nlNL460NL460&gcx=c&sourceid=chr ome&ie=UTF-8&q=new+server+load+test
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to wipe my ass
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,640
|
![]() Huhh.. Huhhhh... You said 'LOAD'... |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Utopia
Posts: 6,482
|
Quote:
lol @sobermofo
__________________
seks.ai for sale - ping me |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,790
|
Visual Studio? It includes a load test tool which enables a developer to execute a variety of tests to simulate real user load.
Others could be Apache JMeter (desktop client) perhaps? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Too lazy to wipe my ass
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,640
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ☣
Posts: 9,327
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 363
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
ORLY?
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NL & US
Posts: 2,579
|
What OS are you running?
I would ask your host to hand you over some performance test results, if your box is managed that shouldn't be a weird question in my opinion and that will give you an idea about if they know what they are doing or not too...:2cents |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
|
ab (ApacheBench) is the standard tool.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/programs/ab.html In practical terms, the CPU and RAM are about a thousand times as fast as the drives, so one a web server the capability of the machine is limited by the drives. Therefore, drive specs tell 90% of the story. That and check whether the machine is using the "noatime" setting. Noatime will increase performance by 15%-50%. That's the capability of the machine. What about software? Well, the server software pretty much just sends a message to the OS asking it to read a file from the drive and send it to the network card. Assuming a gigabit network card, the drive is again the slow part. The web server software really doesn't make much difference as long as it's not doing something extremely dumb. The main thing it can do or not do is force noatime despite the setting. lighttpd, for example, accidentally forces noatime even if the server admin has said not to use that setting. So anyway, for most sites, check the drive and RAID controller specs. That's basically your capacity right there.
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current: support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627 Strongbox - The next generation in site security Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Coupon Guru
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 10,973
|
Quote:
__________________
Webmaster Coupons Coupons and discounts for hosting, domains, SSL Certs, and more! AmeriNOC Coupons | Certified Hosting Coupons | Hosting Coupons | Domain Name Coupons ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
|
Having said what I did Bonnie++ might be a good year to run as well. I'm assuming a pretty typical porn site load. A massive account of traffic to a poorly written PHP script such running say FHGs on a poorly designed database is a different type of load that will suffer more on different hardware. A lot of video encoding, say re-encoding each time a video is played, is something else again. Your test needs to represent the type of load you have.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |