Porn isn't copy-write protected? Lawsuit says so... - GoFuckYourself.com

PornHustler · 02-04-2012, 09:42 AM

Looks like she was downloading porn torrent style and it caught up with here and now she is suing the production company.

Quote:

The woman, Liuxia Wong of Solano, sued first, hitting a studio called Hard Drive Productions on Monday with the argument that its demand for a $3,400 settlement was unconstitutional because porn is obscenity, and obscenity isn't protected by the Copyright Clause of the Constitution.

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...copyright-porn

JFK · 02-04-2012, 10:31 AM

it's copyright btw

DWB · 02-04-2012, 10:46 AM

Hahahahahahaha!

Porn is not obscenity. Obscenity has no definition yet. But the judges know it when they see it. ;-)

What a stupid whore.

EddyTheDog · 02-04-2012, 11:15 AM

Where would that leave us?

It wont happen, but how would we cope if it did?

GregE · 02-04-2012, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornHustler

Looks like she was downloading porn torrent style and it caught up with here and now she is suing the production company.

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...copyright-porn

Too bad she doesn't live somewhere like Polk County, FL.

By asserting that what she knowingly downloaded (what she believes to be) obscene material she has, in effect, admitted to the sort of criminal act that redneck sheriff's love to make a big fuss about.

NaughtyRob · 02-04-2012, 12:51 PM

What he said.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB

Hahahahahahaha!

Porn is not obscenity. Obscenity has no definition yet. But the judges know it when they see it. ;-)

What a stupid whore.

Captain Kawaii · 02-04-2012, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE

Too bad she doesn't live somewhere like Polk County, FL.

By asserting that what she knowingly downloaded (what she believes to be) obscene material she has, in effect, admitted to the sort of criminal act that redneck sheriff's love to make a big fuss about.

What a stupid bitch...Too bad she doesn't live in South Carolina either.
Wong Can't make a Wight in this case.

grumpy · 02-04-2012, 02:58 PM

Stupid yes, but what if, what if she get a very catholic judge??

blackmonsters · 02-04-2012, 07:24 PM

Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
obscene material.

L-Pink · 02-04-2012, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
obscene material.

Good point!

.

FLFHoles · 02-05-2012, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of
obscene material.

It's not illegal to possess obscene material with the exception of CP or Bestiality only to disseminate obscene material. So if she was using torrents and was sending packets while she was receiving packets, then she would be guilty of obscenity distribution. I forget the exact case but I believe it was Georgia and maybe Sirkin who argued on the legality of being able to possess it legally but not being able to purchase it which creates a catch-22.

Her strategy isn't that bad. If the courts can find the material obscene then the company cannot allege infringement because you cannot copyright obscenity. If it can be proven obscene, the DA won't give a shit about the downloaded because they will have a much bigger fish to fry with the pornographer.

vsex · 02-05-2012, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLFHoles

It's not illegal to possess obscene material with the exception of CP or Bestiality only to disseminate obscene material. So if she was using torrents and was sending packets while she was receiving packets, then she would be guilty of obscenity distribution. I forget the exact case but I believe it was Georgia and maybe Sirkin who argued on the legality of being able to possess it legally but not being able to purchase it which creates a catch-22.

Her strategy isn't that bad. If the courts can find the material obscene then the company cannot allege infringement because you cannot copyright obscenity. If it can be proven obscene, the DA won't give a shit about the downloaded because they will have a much bigger fish to fry with the pornographer.

bronco67 · 02-05-2012, 09:13 AM

I hope someone smashes her in the face with a shovel.

FLFHoles · 02-05-2012, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vsex

.....

Prove one thing I said that is incorrect. Just one. I'll wait........

02-04-2012, 10:31 AM	#2
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,374	it's copyright btw __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

02-04-2012, 11:15 AM	#4
EddyTheDog Just Doing My Own Thing Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London, Spain, New Zealand, GFY - Not Croydon... Posts: 25,040	Where would that leave us? It wont happen, but how would we cope if it did? __________________ - Chaturbate Script - https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-b...er-issues.html - Now supports White Labels

02-04-2012, 02:58 PM	#8
grumpy Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Holland Posts: 9,870	Stupid yes, but what if, what if she get a very catholic judge?? __________________ Don't let greediness blur your vision \| You gotta let some shit slide icq - 441-456-888

02-04-2012, 07:24 PM	#9
blackmonsters Making PHP work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇 Posts: 20,304	Well, if she wins the law suit, the DA will have grounds to charge her with possession of obscene material. __________________ Make Money with Porn

02-05-2012, 09:13 AM	#13
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	I hope someone smashes her in the face with a shovel. __________________

02-04-2012, 10:46 AM	#3
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	Hahahahahahaha! Porn is not obscenity. Obscenity has no definition yet. But the judges know it when they see it. ;-) What a stupid whore.