Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 03-29-2012, 02:25 PM   #1
dave90210
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,745
It's Going To Be Illegal To Fuck 18 yr olds now in California

According to some new law it's going to be illegal only in California to have sex with anyone over the age of 18 when you have authority over them. So that's a teacher, employer, photographer, preacher, police officer etc. It's going to be a felony to have sex with an 18 and up female if you have authority over them.

So if this law passes California will have the highest age of consent in the country. They want to make this law on a teacher student relationship that happened in Modesto and guess what the girl was of legal age.

If you shoot porn in California I wouldn't doubt if they go after you guys too since you have authority over the adult woman that your shooting.

What's next changing the age of consent to 40?

More info here
http://abcnews.go.com/US/mom-califor...5#.T3TTBcz-tFo

Last edited by dave90210; 03-29-2012 at 02:37 PM..
dave90210 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:31 PM   #2
Due
Confirmed User
 
Due's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 3,620
Technically you can't have authority over someone of age unless they are locked up, you are an officer of the law or you are their guardian of some kind.

Else the person that is 18 and up will always be in a position where they can leave if they wanted to
__________________
I buy plugs
Skype: Due_Global
/Due
Due is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:32 PM   #3
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Due View Post
Technically you can't have authority over someone of age unless they are locked up, you are an officer of the law or you are their guardian of some kind.

Else the person that is 18 and up will always be in a position where they can leave if they wanted to
Makes sense actually. Custodial power versus free consent.
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:34 PM   #4
brassmonkey
Pay It Forward
 
brassmonkey's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yo Mama House
Posts: 77,228
sounds ok to me
__________________
TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com
brassmonkey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:34 PM   #5
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
So a 21 year old girl bangs her 22 year old shift manager at Burger King and it's a felony offense? Sexual felony at that?

.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:39 PM   #6
Jim_Gunn
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where The Teens Are
Posts: 5,702
The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.
Jim_Gunn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:41 PM   #7
InfoGuy
80/20 Rule
 
InfoGuy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,051
Never mind, I didn't read the article.

Last edited by InfoGuy; 03-29-2012 at 02:42 PM..
InfoGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:42 PM   #8
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn View Post
The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.
You read the link without posting first?

.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 02:49 PM   #9
96ukssob
So Fucking Banananananas
 
96ukssob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it
Posts: 12,991
what about marriage? isnt that authority?
__________________
Email: Clicky on Me
96ukssob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 03:28 PM   #10
KillerK
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,406
People need to read the article.

LOL
KillerK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 03:36 PM   #11
ottopottomouse
She is ugly, bad luck.
 
ottopottomouse's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,177
There's already something similar here but I don't know the full scope of it.
__________________
↑ see post ↑
13101
ottopottomouse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 03:42 PM   #12
mafia_man
Confirmed User
 
mafia_man's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq#: 639544261
Posts: 1,965
__________________
I'm out.
mafia_man is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 03:49 PM   #13
2012
So Fucking What
 
2012's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,189
damn, that's fucked .............. there goes all my plans
__________________
best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
2012 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 03:51 PM   #14
19teenporn
Confirmed User
 
19teenporn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: En la reverendisima concha de tu madre!
Posts: 3,034
Let's move to fuck 19 years old sluts then...
19teenporn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 03:52 PM   #15
2012
So Fucking What
 
2012's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,189
Get out of our pants please
__________________
best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
2012 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 04:05 PM   #16
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn View Post
The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.
thank you Jim
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 04:06 PM   #17
2012
So Fucking What
 
2012's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,189
I'm so glad they got that covered man. that HAD TO BE THE TOP FUCKING PRIORITY for everyone . I swear when I left the house I could hear everyone talking about this particular issue everywhere ..........
__________________
best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
2012 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 09:57 PM   #18
xxxdesign-net
My hips don't lie
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,129
while it's true that if a law is passed making it illegal for a teacher to have a relationship with say a 23yo student, because one supposedly has authority over the other, it will open the door to making a boss/employee relationship illegal based on the same pretext... that being said, the thread starter could be a little bit more honest next time he makes a thread...

Last edited by xxxdesign-net; 03-29-2012 at 09:59 PM..
xxxdesign-net is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 09:59 PM   #19
lucas131
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,475
i vote for 40+, it will sure produce clever people
lucas131 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 12:09 AM   #20
CHMOD
Confirmed User
 
CHMOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,697
USA is becoming a more and more fucked up society every day.

Instead of focussing on sex, it would be a good idea to fight violent crimes and drug/weapon traffic.
__________________
Sell our Silicone Dolls and make big money!

Our website:
https://www.sexdolls-shop.com/

Signup:
http://www.sexdollscash.com/sliiing/registration.php

Contact:
[email protected]
CHMOD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 12:26 AM   #21
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net View Post
while it's true that if a law is passed making it illegal for a teacher to have a relationship with say a 23yo student, because one supposedly has authority over the other, it will open the door to making a boss/employee relationship illegal based on the same pretext... that being said, the thread starter could be a little bit more honest next time he makes a thread...
Several companies have this as a company policy anyway.....
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 01:13 AM   #22
alextokyo
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 975
If it's all the same, I guess I'll just stick to 11 year olds.

If she's old enough to count, she's old enough to mount.
alextokyo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 01:26 AM   #23
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
You read the link without posting first?

.
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 02:46 AM   #24
DamianJ
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
DamianJ's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A magical land
Posts: 15,808
Maybe someone watched Girl With The Dragon Tattoo?
DamianJ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 03:35 AM   #25
ruff
I have a plan B
 
ruff's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle - Miami - St Kitts
Posts: 5,501
We need still more ways to lock up people in this country. The USA must look to the rest of the world the way we look at California. Just plain nuts.
__________________
CryptoFeeds
ruff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 05:14 AM   #26
travs
Confirmed User
 
travs's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,631
that's just fucked up
travs is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 08:18 AM   #27
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 73,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn View Post
The reading comprehension level on this board is astonishing. The article says that some woman is pushing for a new law. This law, if it were to be passed, would apply to teachers, presumably only public school teachers and high school students. It doesn't mention any other people. WTF are you even talking about "authority". No one has such authority over other adults except in some particular circumstances like a police officer working on the job or dealing with mentally handicapped people or such things.
The problem is the terms used are too vague. What it does it mean to have "authority" over someone? Does that mean someone is a prisoner, a student, or an employee? Does a manager at Wendy's have "authority" over one of their employees. I would think yes. Companies and the US military already has rules and laws in place about this.

One hand, the teacher who is banging his eighteen year old student has done nothing wrong. He's having sex with another adult. On the other hand, I have a daughter in school, and if I found out her teacher was having sex with her - no matter her age - the least of his concerns would be tossing the salad in prison.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 08:22 AM   #28
dev777
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 366
wont pass. period.
dev777 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 08:24 AM   #29
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff View Post
We need still more ways to lock up people in this country. The USA must look to the rest of the world the way we look at California. Just plain nuts.
Unfortunately what happens in California, trends/legislation, tends to spread to the rest of the nation.

.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 09:38 AM   #30
xxxdesign-net
My hips don't lie
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by PornoMonster View Post
Several companies have this as a company policy anyway.....
so? big difference between being a company policy and being a government enforced law...
xxxdesign-net is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 09:40 AM   #31
xxxdesign-net
My hips don't lie
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by dev777 View Post
wont pass. period.
what makes you believe that? 23 states already have such a law
xxxdesign-net is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 09:45 AM   #32
Quentin
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
For those interested, here's the actual text of the bill (AB 1861):

Quote:
SECTION 1.
Section 1243.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:

1243.5.
(a) If a teacher or school employee is convicted of a violation of Section 288.6 of the Penal Code, he or she shall forfeit all accrued rights and benefits in any public retirement system in which he or she is a member, effective on the date of the conviction.
(b) Any contributions to the public retirement system made by the teacher or school employee described in subdivision (a) shall be returned, without interest, to the teacher or school employee, in a manner conforming with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
(c) The school district that employs a teacher or school employee described in subdivision (a) shall notify the public retirement system in which the person is a member of the person?s conviction.

SEC. 2.
Section 288.6 is added to the Penal Code, to read:

288.6.
(a) Any teacher or employee at a public elementary or secondary school who engages in a sexual relationship or in excess and inappropriate communication with a pupil of any age who is enrolled in the school is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in a county jail pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.
(b) For purposes of this section, ?excess and inappropriate communication? means any communication by a school employee to a pupil, regardless of who initiated the communication, that may be viewed as derogatory, sexual, lewd, threatening, harassing, discriminatory, or suggestive in nature.
(c) In addition to the penalties provided by this section, a person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall, pursuant to Section 1243.5 of the Government Code, forfeit his or her rights and benefits in any public retirement system in which he or she is a member.

SEC. 3.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
I can see a couple places where the bill could be treading into some questionable territory from a First Amendment perspective (mostly within the statutory definition of "excess and inappropriate communication" it provides) but I have no idea how a court would interpret that language, or whether a successful First Amendment based challenge could be mounted against the bill on that basis, should it ever become law.

There are already laws regulating the relationships between teachers/students on the books of some other states, btw, along with similar laws that make it a crime for people like psychiatrists/psychologists to have sex with their patients (or even ex-patients), including some that even cover professions like dental hygienists.
__________________
Q. Boyer
Quentin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.