Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham Silly statement. Yes we do, otherwise toys would have lead paint and sharp things that could harm a child, children's food could be contaminated. The Government needs to regulate children are strapped in and sit in the rear seat. Otherwise stupid people wouldn't bother and they might cause an accident that kills you and your child. Extreme example, but it happens. Another one, law on driving. Shall we leave that to a parents discretion or should the Government impose a law on who's kids can drive?

No one is reduced to a bloody mass or a corpse because they saw naked people fucking ... There is no imminent danger in porn viewing so there is no parallel in the argument.

If anything, the government's responsibility should be to educate parents on how to use parental filters -- parents should be able to decide what their children view.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam No one is reduced to a bloody mass or a corpse because they saw naked people fucking ... There is no imminent danger in porn viewing so there is no parallel in the argument.

Whether or not it harms children is not the point. The point is can a politician get support with this sitting duck of a problem. "I don't want my kids exposed to gay porn" or whatever. Every parent will agree. Just a silly example but the porn industry is a popular target and an easy one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam If anything, the government's responsibility should be to educate parents on how to use parental filters -- parents should be able to decide what their children view.