CNN Literally coaching people to recite pro-clinton slogans - GoFuckYourself.com

Coup · 10-09-2016, 09:39 PM

Jesus fucking christ.

Relic · 10-09-2016, 09:47 PM

In Soviet America, opinion forms you.

crockett · 10-09-2016, 09:50 PM

Much like the Trump campaign, you are a train wreck..

Coup · 10-09-2016, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Much like the Trump campaign, you are a train wreck..

And such is the requirement to muster up even the most flacid of defenses for hillary clinton.. you are fucking delusional.

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 09:55 PM

she is asking her about feedback she made during the debate...if you were actually asking they did the same thing with the guy who liked Trumps "jail" talk right before that

what are you gonna do with yourself in a month?

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 09:55 PM

we are so delusional...put your money where your mouth is

$1000 on the election right now lets do it

Relic · 10-09-2016, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

you are a train wreck..

Joshua G · 10-09-2016, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

we are so delusional...put your money where your mouth is

$1000 on the election right now lets do it

sure...with hilary being given 80% chance of winning by nate silver. you would have to lay 4000 dollars to win 1000 dollars...you cant just expect a trump backer to go straight up with you...hilary is the favorite...so you put up 4000 dollars & i put up 1000 dollars & your on!

moron.

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

we are so delusional...

IF you can muster up a defense for Hillary clinton then you have to be delusional. It's absolutely undeniable that she is full of shit with the wealth of evidence that points to the simple fact that everything she says can not be trusted.

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

$1000 on the election right now lets do it

Go hit the casino you gambling degenerate

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

sure...with hilary being given 80% chance of winning by nate silver. you would have to lay 4000 dollars to win 1000 dollars...you cant just expect a trump backer to go straight up with you...hilary is the favorite...so you put up 4000 dollars & i put up 1000 dollars & your on!

moron.

exactly, you know he is gonna lose...if you actually felt as strongly as you troll you would take the money

you have dedicated the last year of your life to being a Trump fanboy and his is about to lose in a landslide to the 2nd worst presidential candidate of all time

GJ

kane · 10-09-2016, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

sure...with hilary being given 80% chance of winning by nate silver. you would have to lay 4000 dollars to win 1000 dollars...you cant just expect a trump backer to go straight up with you...hilary is the favorite...so you put up 4000 dollars & i put up 1000 dollars & your on!

moron.

You have said multiple times that Nate Silver is corrupt and can't be taken seriously. . . as a matter of fact you do this a lot. You say polls are fake until they give you the result you like. You say Nate Silver can't be trusted, but now you use him as an example of how Hillary is leading.

Which is it. Is Nate Silver not to be trusted, or is he?

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

Go hit the casino you gambling degenerate

they know Trump is gonna lose, no money there

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

they know Trump is gonna lose, no money there

That's why I say you're delusional. You think I actually give a fuck if he does.

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

IF you can muster up a defense for Hillary clinton then you have to be delusional. It's absolutely undeniable that she is full of shit with the wealth of evidence that points to the simple fact that everything she says can not be trusted.

I haven't been pumping up Hillary, in fact I think she is the 2nd worst candidate of all time...I am just saying its all over, get on with your life

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

That's why I say you're delusional. You think I actually give a fuck if he does.

you certainly seem to care

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

I haven't been pumping up Hillary, in fact I think she is the 2nd worst candidate of all time...I am just saying its all over, get on with your life

Then why are you attacking me? Where's the logic in this behavior? WHy the fuck are you trying to gamble on a person you claim to dislike.

Doesn't make sense. It just doesn't add up.

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

you certainly seem to care

I very deeply care that we keep voting in governments that DO NOT represent the people's wishes all the while blowing smoke up their asses. Yes I do care about that. And I very much care that folks like yourself turn a blind eye to them while they do it.

kane · 10-09-2016, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

I very deeply care that we keep voting in governments that DO NOT represent the people's wishes all the while blowing smoke up their asses. Yes I do care about that. And I very much care that folks like yourself turn a blind eye to them while they do it.

I agree with the sentiment of voting for someone who is not part of the government establishment and for someone who might actually represent the people and not big interests etc. However, I think Trump is just not a good choice. I don't think Hillary is either. I see this election as a mulligan and hopefully in 4 years we have better options.

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

I very deeply care that we keep voting in governments that DO NOT represent the people's wishes all the while blowing smoke up their asses. Yes I do care about that. And I very much care that folks like yourself turn a blind eye to them while they do it.

what people? if the republicans wanted to win they should have ran somebody, anybody else...they would have won

too late

flashfire · 10-09-2016, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

I agree with the sentiment of voting for someone who is not part of the government establishment and for someone who might actually represent the people and not big interests etc. However, I think Trump is just not a good choice. I don't think Hillary is either. I see this election as a mulligan and hopefully in 4 years we have better options.

In four years you will have Hillary and somebody else

hopefully the republicans find somebody half decent

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

I agree with the sentiment of voting for someone who is not part of the government establishment and for someone who might actually represent the people and not big interests etc. However, I think Trump is just not a good choice. I don't think Hillary is either. I see this election as a mulligan and hopefully in 4 years we have better options.

Look. in all seriousness and honesty. I think a Trump presidency would be a clusterfuck of the highest order. Any sane person would. But I would not be broken hearted should he be elected. Why? Because it just may be a small price to pay to curb the never ending onslaught of bullshit politicians with bullshit, covert agendas, slowly selling this country up the river. Hillary Clinton is the absolute embodiment of every god damned thing wrong with this country and it's government. Say what you will about Trump... but, there's no denying that he has listened to what the people have to say and is running on a platform of exactly what most people are clamouring for. Will I be voting for him? No. But god damn it I'll be cheering the crazy son of a bitch on.

Joshua G · 10-09-2016, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

You have said multiple times that Nate Silver is corrupt and can't be taken seriously. . . as a matter of fact you do this a lot. You say polls are fake until they give you the result you like. You say Nate Silver can't be trusted, but now you use him as an example of how Hillary is leading.

Which is it. Is Nate Silver not to be trusted, or is he?

no kane...nates number is bullshit. his map is a liberal fudge factory, look at all the blue in the rust belt, & florida. please...you know i think trump will win, so my number is much different than nate silvers 80%. i posted my map in my own thread that outlines which swing states i think trump captures. i give trump up to 313 electoral votes.

i simply used nate as a publicly known quantity that is providing an election probability. had i cited an obscure poll or gambling site, would you trust that number?

Coup · 10-09-2016, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

anybody else...they would have won

No, no they wouldn't have. If anything has been made painfully clear with this election, it's this: Anyone that would even consider voting republican is completely fed up with typical republican bullshit. that's true because that's the only reason donald trump is where he is right now.

Joshua G · 10-09-2016, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire

exactly, you know he is gonna lose...if you actually felt as strongly as you troll you would take the money

you have dedicated the last year of your life to being a Trump fanboy and his is about to lose in a landslide to the 2nd worst presidential candidate of all time

GJ

why the fuck should i go straight up with you when i can get more than 3 to 1 in the gambling world. do you have a fucking brain?

you either match the markets odds, or kiss off with your bullshit offer of even money.

im pretty sure your too dumb to understand gambling odds or moneylines...

kane · 10-09-2016, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G

no kane...nates number is bullshit. his map is a liberal fudge factory, look at all the blue in the rust belt, & florida. please...you know i think trump will win, so my number is much different than nate silvers 80%. i posted my map in my own thread that outlines which swing states i think trump captures. i give trump up to 313 electoral votes.

i simply used nate as a publicly known quantity that is providing an election probability. had i cited an obscure poll or gambling site, would you trust that number?

You can't say his number is bullshit, then cite said number as a reason to get better odds in a bet.

I think Trump will get about 200 electoral votes.

kane · 10-09-2016, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

Look. in all seriousness and honesty. I think a Trump presidency would be a clusterfuck of the highest order. Any sane person would. But I would not be broken hearted should he be elected. Why? Because it just may be a small price to pay to curb the never ending onslaught of bullshit politicians with bullshit, covert agendas, slowly selling this country up the river. Hillary Clinton is the absolute embodiment of every god damned thing wrong with this country and it's government. Say what you will about Trump... but, there's no denying that he has listened to what the people have to say and is running on a platform of exactly what most people are clamouring for. Will I be voting for him? No. But god damn it I'll be cheering the crazy son of a bitch on.

We are very much alike on the idea that we need someone to change things up. There is part of me that wants Trump to win just to watch the shit show that unravels from it. However, there is part of me that thinks he would be sending our troops into combat just to show the world how big his dick is.

Personally, I don't think a Trump presidency would bring about much change. I think the biggest agent of change would be to get rid of the lifetime politicians in the House and Senate and enact term limits.

Joshua G · 10-09-2016, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

You can't say his number is bullshit, then cite said number as a reason to get better odds in a bet.

I think Trump will get about 200 electoral votes.

nates number is bullshit, In My Opinion...but nate is publicly regarded as a quant on this matter, so for wagering purposes, since that is where liberals think the election stands. that is a reasonable number to use.

im entitled to have my own take, different from silvers. i give trump a solid W.

& there are more sources than silver that put hilary at least 70% chance to win...so debating the origin of the odds is mute.

hilary gamblers can lay market odds or STFU...

Coup · 10-09-2016, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

We are very much alike on the idea that we need someone to change things up. There is part of me that wants Trump to win just to watch the shit show that unravels from it. However, there is part of me that thinks he would be sending our troops into combat just to show the world how big his dick is.

We are going to war and many people are going to die no matter who wins. This is one inescapable fact that can not be avoided. I too hope it isn't our men and women.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

Personally, I don't think a Trump presidency would bring about much change. I think the biggest agent of change would be to get rid of the lifetime politicians in the House and Senate and enact term limits.

YOu're too focused on the man and not paying attention to the complete rejection of the status quo that he represents in my opinion. It's the rejection that we should be fostering and nurturing. To what extent is just depending on what you're willing to stomach. Basically what I'm saying is..

Come on bruh... This could both be us but you playin'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism

kane · 10-09-2016, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

We are going to war and many people are going to die no matter who wins. This is one inescapable fact that can not be avoided. I too hope it isn't our men and women.

YOu're too focused on the man and not paying attention to the complete rejection of the status quo that he represents in my opinion. It's the rejection that we should be fostering and nurturing. To what extent is just depending on what you're willing to stomach. Basically what I'm saying is..

Come on bruh... This could both be us but you playin'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism

I'll actually be looking closely at the House and Senate races than the Presidental race. I'll be curious to see how it goes. In the last election Congress had an approval rating of somewhere near 10% yet they saw a more than 90% reelection rate. I'm curious to see how it goes this time around. If people are really willing to buck the status quo they should also then be willing to vote out their sitting representatives and/or Senator.

What I hope he does is show others that they can run and that they don't have to be part of the big political machine to do so. If this election or the next one show some movement towards getting the lifelong politicians out of the House and Senate I will give him credit for getting the ball rolling. That said, I have always said that a lot of people talk a good game, but aren't really ready to play the game. They say they want change, but when it comes down to it, they don't really want change and won't vote for it.

Coup · 10-09-2016, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

I'll actually be looking closely at the House and Senate races than the Presidental race. I'll be curious to see how it goes. In the last election Congress had an approval rating of somewhere near 10% yet they saw a more than 90% reelection rate. I'm curious to see how it goes this time around. If people are really willing to buck the status quo they should also then be willing to vote out their sitting representatives and/or Senator.

I'm sure that you're just as aware as I am that only the nerdiest of political wonks pay much attention to to rep. and senate races (generally speaking). So, I would caution anyone from holding out any hope what-so-ever that interesting change would come from either. Basically with our governmental structure interesting change will only come either from the bottom up (the masses in outright revolution) or the top down (a radical chief executive). Certainly not the absolute quagmire clusterfuck shithole middle of the houses.

And as it currently looks the only interesting game in town is Donald "Grab 'em by the pussy" Trump. As depressing as that is.

kane · 10-10-2016, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

I'm sure that you're just as aware as I am that only the nerdiest of political wonks pay much attention to to rep. and senate races (generally speaking). So, I would caution anyone from holding out any hope what-so-ever that interesting change would come from either. Basically with our governmental structure interesting change will only come either from the bottom up (the masses in outright revolution) or the top down (a radical chief executive). Certainly not the absolute quagmire clusterfuck shithole middle of the houses.

And as it currently looks the only interesting game in town is Donald "Grab 'em by the pussy" Trump. As depressing as that is.

It would be interesting to see how a Trump presidency would affect the next midterm election. Typically the party that controls the White House tends to lose some seats. I wonder if there would be any larger changes downstream from him. Sadly, if he were to win, he would be surrounded by career politicians so I wonder how much change might actually happen.

Personally, the only way I see real change happening is if someone ran for President and created their own party to do so. Like Perot did when he ran. The Reform Party actually got some people elected at the state and local levels, but sadly it collapsed into chaos and became controlled by crazy people. It would be cool to see someone do that and have the party remain viable.

Coup · 10-10-2016, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

It would be interesting to see how a Trump presidency would affect the next midterm election. Typically the party that controls the White House tends to lose some seats. I wonder if there would be any larger changes downstream from him. Sadly, if he were to win, he would be surrounded by career politicians so I wonder how much change might actually happen.

It's undeniable that Trump has exposed the Republican party to be the souless pack of fucking idiots that anyone paying attention and willing to be honest with themselves could already see. I mean, fucking shit, McCain and Cruz both endorsed him after being dealt indignities that would get a person's ass kicked where I'm from. He's already done a massive amount of damage by sheer force of his own narcissism. To me that's astounding and I could not applaud what's going on there more. I think his presidency would bring that ten fold. Whether or not that sort of change means good things to the American people is doubtful.. but shit.. it's happening on an unprecedented scale and degree the likes of which we have never seen. Any step towards completely fucking up this batshit crazy Status Quo trajectory we have found ourselves in is a step in the right direction.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

, the only way I see real change happening is if someone ran for President and created their own party to do so. Like Perot did when he ran. The Reform Party actually got some people elected at the state and local levels, but sadly it collapsed into chaos and became controlled by crazy people. It would be cool to see someone do that and have the party remain viable.

I could almost hop on board with a new party Idea. But the two parties are WAY too deeply ingrained into American culture to be simply side-stepped by a new party. The only way we are getting past this nonsense is complete revolt in the established parties. The coup is well underway on the republican side and I'm more than angry that the democrats haven't, and seemingly refuse to, follow suit.

kane · 10-10-2016, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

It's undeniable that Trump has exposed the Republican party to be the souless pack of fucking idiots that anyone paying attention and willing to be honest with themselves could already see. I mean, fucking shit, McCain and Cruz both endorsed him after being dealt indignities that would get a person's ass kicked where I'm from. He's already done a massive amount of damage by sheer force of his own narcissism. To me that's astounding and I could not applaud what's going on there more. I think his presidency would bring that ten fold. Whether or not that sort of change means good things to the American people is doubtful.. but shit.. it's happening on an unprecedented scale and degree the likes of which we have never seen. Any step towards completely fucking up this batshit crazy Status Quo trajectory we have found ourselves in is a step in the right direction.

I could almost hop on board with a new party Idea. But the two parties are WAY too deeply ingrained into American culture to be simply side-stepped by a new party. The only way we are getting past this nonsense is complete revolt in the established parties. The coup is well underway on the republican side and I'm more than angry that the democrats haven't, and seemingly refuse to, follow suit.

Win or lose it will be interesting to see how the republican party reacts and what they do going forward. If Trump loses will they look at the party and change or will they just keep repackaging the same bullshit and hope it works this time. The democrats do the same thing, but so far their base hasn't gotten fed up with them.

If Trump were to lose it would be great to see the Republican base continue to reject the same old career assholes that always run.

While I really dislike Cruz as a person, I respected him when he refused to endorse Trump because of what Trump said about his wife (although Cruz played that game as well when he posted the pic of Trump's wife), but he lost all of his credibility when he caved and endorsed him.

Coup · 10-10-2016, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

If Trump were to lose it would be great to see the Republican base continue to reject the same old career assholes that always run.

What Trump has started isn't going away anytime soon. Unlike the astroturfed nonsense that was the Tea Party, this is a genuine movement of people that are fed the hell up and it is beautiful to witness. I see exciting things happening in the Republican party going forward.

GFED · 10-10-2016, 03:21 AM

Shillary will still win. Even if the majority votes Trump. Do you really think we live in a democracy?

nico-t · 10-10-2016, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GFED

Shillary will still win. Even if the majority votes Trump. Do you really think we live in a democracy?

Miracles do happen - the arrogant establishment overestimated themselves with Brexit, and the people schooled them.

I've put some money on Trump

10-09-2016, 09:39 PM	#1
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	CNN Literally coaching people to recite pro-clinton slogans Jesus fucking christ.

10-09-2016, 09:47 PM	#2
Relic So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 10,300	In Soviet America, opinion forms you.

10-09-2016, 09:50 PM	#3
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 75,453	Much like the Trump campaign, you are a train wreck..

10-09-2016, 09:55 PM	#5
flashfire ICQ 1 6 7 8 5 3 4 9 2 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13,098	she is asking her about feedback she made during the debate...if you were actually asking they did the same thing with the guy who liked Trumps "jail" talk right before that what are you gonna do with yourself in a month?

10-10-2016, 03:21 AM	#36
GFED Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 8,098	Shillary will still win. Even if the majority votes Trump. Do you really think we live in a democracy?