The Stink Without a Secret - GoFuckYourself.com

wehateporn · 07-04-2017, 02:25 AM

"After six solid months of co-ordinated allegation from the mainstream media allied to the leadership of state security institutions, not one single scrap of solid evidence for Trump/Russia election hacking has emerged.

I do not support Donald Trump. I do support truth. There is much about Trump that I dislike intensely. Neither do I support the neo-liberal political establishment in the USA. The latter?s control of the mainstream media, and cunning manipulation of identity politics, seeks to portray the neo-liberal establishment as the heroes of decent values against Trump. Sadly, the idea that the neo-liberal establishment embodies decent values is completely untrue.

Truth disappeared so long ago in this witch-hunt that it is no longer even possible to define what the accusation is. Belief in ?Russian hacking? of the US election has been elevated to a generic accusation of undefined wrongdoing, a vague malaise we are told is floating poisonously in the ether, but we are not allowed to analyse. What did the Russians actually do?

The original, base accusation is that it was the Russians who hacked the DNC and Podesta emails and passed them to Wikileaks. (I can assure you that is untrue).

The authenticity of those emails is not in question. What they revealed of cheating by the Democratic establishment in biasing the primaries against Bernie Sanders, led to the forced resignation of Debbie Wasserman Shultz as chair of the Democratic National Committee. They also led to the resignation from CNN of Donna Brazile, who had passed debate questions in advance to Clinton. Those are facts. They actually happened. Let us hold on to those facts, as we surf through lies. There was other nasty Clinton Foundation and cash for access stuff in the emails, but we do not even need to go there for the purpose of this argument.

The original ?Russian hacking? allegation was that it was the Russians who nefariously obtained these damning emails and passed them to Wikileaks. The ?evidence? for this was twofold. A report from private cyber security firm Crowdstrike claimed that metadata showed that the hackers had left behind clues, including the name of the founder of the Soviet security services. The second piece of evidence was that a blogger named Guccifer2 and a websitecalled DNC Leaks appeared to have access to some of the material around the same time that Wikileaks did, and that Guccifer2 could be Russian.

That is it. To this day, that is the sum total of actual ?evidence? of Russian hacking. I won?t say hang on to it as a fact, because it contains no relevant fact. But at least it is some form of definable allegation of something happening, rather than ?Russian hacking? being a simple article of faith like the Holy Trinity.

But there are a number of problems that prevent this being fact at all. Nobody has ever been able to refute the evidence of Bill Binney, former Technical Director of the NSA who designed its current surveillance systems. Bill has stated that the capability of the NSA is such, that if the DNC computers had been hacked, the NSA would be able to trace the actual packets of that information as those emails travelled over the internet, and give a precise time, to the second, for the hack. The NSA simply do not have the event ? because there wasn?t one. I know Bill personally and am quite certain of his integrity.

As we have been repeatedly told, ?17 intelligence agencies? sign up to the ?Russian hacking?, yet all these king?s horses and all these king?s men have been unable to produce any evidence whatsoever of the purported ?hack?. Largely because they are not in fact trying. Here is another actual fact I wish you to hang on to: The Democrats have refused the intelligence agencies access to their servers to discover what actually happened. I am going to say that again."

Continued https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archi...ithout-secret/

CurrentlySober · 07-04-2017, 03:21 AM

I often make a stink without any secret...

Busty2 · 07-04-2017, 09:35 AM

There is not way they will produce any evidence until the investigations are concluded and that could take years.

07-04-2017, 02:25 AM	#1
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,172	The Stink Without a Secret "After six solid months of co-ordinated allegation from the mainstream media allied to the leadership of state security institutions, not one single scrap of solid evidence for Trump/Russia election hacking has emerged. I do not support Donald Trump. I do support truth. There is much about Trump that I dislike intensely. Neither do I support the neo-liberal political establishment in the USA. The latter?s control of the mainstream media, and cunning manipulation of identity politics, seeks to portray the neo-liberal establishment as the heroes of decent values against Trump. Sadly, the idea that the neo-liberal establishment embodies decent values is completely untrue. Truth disappeared so long ago in this witch-hunt that it is no longer even possible to define what the accusation is. Belief in ?Russian hacking? of the US election has been elevated to a generic accusation of undefined wrongdoing, a vague malaise we are told is floating poisonously in the ether, but we are not allowed to analyse. What did the Russians actually do? The original, base accusation is that it was the Russians who hacked the DNC and Podesta emails and passed them to Wikileaks. (I can assure you that is untrue). The authenticity of those emails is not in question. What they revealed of cheating by the Democratic establishment in biasing the primaries against Bernie Sanders, led to the forced resignation of Debbie Wasserman Shultz as chair of the Democratic National Committee. They also led to the resignation from CNN of Donna Brazile, who had passed debate questions in advance to Clinton. Those are facts. They actually happened. Let us hold on to those facts, as we surf through lies. There was other nasty Clinton Foundation and cash for access stuff in the emails, but we do not even need to go there for the purpose of this argument. The original ?Russian hacking? allegation was that it was the Russians who nefariously obtained these damning emails and passed them to Wikileaks. The ?evidence? for this was twofold. A report from private cyber security firm Crowdstrike claimed that metadata showed that the hackers had left behind clues, including the name of the founder of the Soviet security services. The second piece of evidence was that a blogger named Guccifer2 and a websitecalled DNC Leaks appeared to have access to some of the material around the same time that Wikileaks did, and that Guccifer2 could be Russian. That is it. To this day, that is the sum total of actual ?evidence? of Russian hacking. I won?t say hang on to it as a fact, because it contains no relevant fact. But at least it is some form of definable allegation of something happening, rather than ?Russian hacking? being a simple article of faith like the Holy Trinity. But there are a number of problems that prevent this being fact at all. Nobody has ever been able to refute the evidence of Bill Binney, former Technical Director of the NSA who designed its current surveillance systems. Bill has stated that the capability of the NSA is such, that if the DNC computers had been hacked, the NSA would be able to trace the actual packets of that information as those emails travelled over the internet, and give a precise time, to the second, for the hack. The NSA simply do not have the event ? because there wasn?t one. I know Bill personally and am quite certain of his integrity. As we have been repeatedly told, ?17 intelligence agencies? sign up to the ?Russian hacking?, yet all these king?s horses and all these king?s men have been unable to produce any evidence whatsoever of the purported ?hack?. Largely because they are not in fact trying. Here is another actual fact I wish you to hang on to: The Democrats have refused the intelligence agencies access to their servers to discover what actually happened. I am going to say that again." Continued https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archi...ithout-secret/ __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

07-04-2017, 03:21 AM	#2
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,210	I often make a stink without any secret... __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

07-04-2017, 09:35 AM	#3
Busty2 Member since 1999 Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Off the Amalfi coast Posts: 7,202	There is not way they will produce any evidence until the investigations are concluded and that could take years.