A quick recap of American Military History: - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

mikeyddddd · 05-24-2007, 07:08 PM

FIDDY
NTM

Go Fuck Yourself

Z · 05-24-2007, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

One of the most important days in US history that you forgot to post..

November 10, 1775

Semper Fi

Fuck Yea! Oorah!

Getting into specifics in answering this post is pointless. It's just a baiting troll.

notabook · 05-24-2007, 07:13 PM

I miss BoyAlley

baddog · 05-24-2007, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishTom

also the UK was not invaded during WWII so again there was no actual 'freeing' from the Nazi's involved (Channel Islands excepted)

No, just stopped them from bombing you day and night.

Matt 26z · 05-24-2007, 11:51 PM

What are some of your opinions on what would have happened in WW2 had the US not gotten involved in Europe?

In the US stories to come out of WW2 are sacred, and WW2 Hollywood movies portray US soldiers as the biggest studs of all time without mentioning what the Russians did.

Some believe that had the US military not gotten involved that Hitler would have crossed the Atlantic and invaded the US. Realistically, was that possible? Could Russia have put the nails in the Nazi coffin on their own without US involvement?

pocketkangaroo · 05-25-2007, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

What are some of your opinions on what would have happened in WW2 had the US not gotten involved in Europe?

In the US stories to come out of WW2 are sacred, and WW2 Hollywood movies portray US soldiers as the biggest studs of all time without mentioning what the Russians did.

Some believe that had the US military not gotten involved that Hitler would have crossed the Atlantic and invaded the US. Realistically, was that possible? Could Russia have put the nails in the Nazi coffin on their own without US involvement?

The UK would have been overrun if the US had not given them supplies. They were flat broke and simply couldn't afford the war.

Matt 26z · 05-25-2007, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

The UK would have been overrun if the US had not given them supplies. They were flat broke and simply couldn't afford the war.

I have read that Hitler wanted to take England first, but believed he needed air superiority. So instead he invaded Russia.

FetishTom · 05-25-2007, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

A little revisionist history on your part.

First, the British were broke and got $50b from the US in supplies to fight the war.

Lent not gave. UK finished paying back the loan earlier this year. Also seem to recall it was US$5 billion but am open to correction on that

And again way too sensitive!

FetishTom · 05-25-2007, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

What are some of your opinions on what would have happened in WW2 had the US not gotten involved in Europe?

In the US stories to come out of WW2 are sacred, and WW2 Hollywood movies portray US soldiers as the biggest studs of all time without mentioning what the Russians did.

Some believe that had the US military not gotten involved that Hitler would have crossed the Atlantic and invaded the US. Realistically, was that possible? Could Russia have put the nails in the Nazi coffin on their own without US involvement?

Take any one of the three main components out of the equation USA,UK, USSR and the result would have been very different as any two together would have been unlikely to defeat the Germans. The thread is just a 'my dick is bigger than your dick' argument

CWeb · 05-25-2007, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishTom

Take any one of the three main components out of the equation USA,UK, USSR and the result would have been very different as any two together would have been unlikely to defeat the Germans. The thread is just a 'my dick is bigger than your dick' argument

Prob correct Tom - also remember this was a world war on several fronts.

Agree.. it's the usual old GFY crap syndrome about dick size - easy when they never played a roll, but just talk

pocketkangaroo · 05-25-2007, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishTom

Lent not gave. UK finished paying back the loan earlier this year. Also seem to recall it was US$5 billion but am open to correction on that

And again way too sensitive!

It might have been. The US passed a bill that authorized up to $50b I believe.

05-24-2007, 07:08 PM	#51
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	FIDDY NTM Go Fuck Yourself __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys Last edited by mikeyddddd; 05-24-2007 at 07:10 PM..

05-24-2007, 07:13 PM	#53
notabook Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Not a Library! Posts: 9,748	I miss BoyAlley __________________

05-24-2007, 11:51 PM	#55
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	What are some of your opinions on what would have happened in WW2 had the US not gotten involved in Europe? In the US stories to come out of WW2 are sacred, and WW2 Hollywood movies portray US soldiers as the biggest studs of all time without mentioning what the Russians did. Some believe that had the US military not gotten involved that Hitler would have crossed the Atlantic and invaded the US. Realistically, was that possible? Could Russia have put the nails in the Nazi coffin on their own without US involvement?